User talk:199.189.61.37

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 199.189.61.37, is registered to Franciscan Health and may be shared by multiple users using public terminals or a Wi-Fi hotspot, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock or Template:School block. Public terminals and Wi-Fi hotspots may have set expiry times (usually in 30- or 60-minute intervals); consider this in deciding a block duration. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation; network administrators may be able to disable access to the network by offenders.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Regarding edits made during January 19 2007

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 14:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Lincoln-Way East High School on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Ibagli (Talk) 00:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

labelling depression as anti-social behavior is fucking stupid quit listening to your lizard brain offspring knew the kids aren't alright and I know HE BLAMES SUM 41'S STUPID SENSITIVE ANTI SOCIAL MUSIC Jesse sees the Future / Disturbingly Funny

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Grand Canyon has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Closedmouth (talk) 11:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pancytopenia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pancytopenia was changed by 199.189.61.37 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.994579 on 2012-01-31T12:39:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:39, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Daily Med because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 16:35, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tubal ligation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tubal ligation was changed by 199.189.61.37 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876125 on 2013-06-30T10:17:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:17, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tubal ligation with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 10:19, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Tubal ligation. Yintan 10:20, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:26, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm Antiqueight. Your recent edit to the page Whitman, Massachusetts appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 18:54, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Date changes "BCE/CE" to "BC/AD"

Hi 199.189.61.37, You have just changed the date format of Battle of the Teutoburg Forest, from "BCE/CE" to "BC/AD", with no discussion on the article's talk page. or comment in the edit summary.

Although Wikipedia does not have a preferred style for year numbering systems, please note that Wikipedia policy on this subject (see WP:ERA) states: "Do not change from one style to another unless there is substantial reason for the change, and consensus for the change with other editors."

Please note also that this issue has been previously discussed on the talk page, with most of the participants opposing the change. I have therefore reverted your changes. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 02:33, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding HB2 and Pat McCrory

I've noticed you've been making edits to the Pat McCrory and Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act articles. You use one clearly biased source for your information. Keep in mind that Wikipedia is a place for unbiased info. Also keep in mind that those articles are not about debating the legitimacy of transgender people's identities', or their mental state. If the law were truly based in an opinion article you found online, then you need to provide a secondary source, like a news network, that says such, supported by statements made by the law makers or the governor. If you continue to post such blatantly biased and unnecessary information, especially without good citations, you will be blocked from editing. If you need any clarification, see my talk page. Indy beetle (talk) 21:04, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've already been warned about this. Stop posting this information to the articles. If you want to discuss it, go to their talk pages. If continue to post biased and unsourced info you will be blocked. Indy beetle (talk) 21:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a final warning regarding the edits mentioned by Indy beetle. Take it to the talk page - it is likely you will be blocked if it happens again. MisterRandomized (talk) 21:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am reporting you for vandalizing Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act, seeing as you have been warned multiple times. --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 22:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

September 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Tony Pulis. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2018

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Testosterone have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 14:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019

Hello, I'm Vulpes ignis. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Saint Joseph's College (Indiana) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Vulpes ignis (talk) 17:16, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism (as caught by filters). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 00:40, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.