User talk:203.11.167.2

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 203.11.167.2, is registered to Chisholm Institute, Australia and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.

Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

RC patrollers and Sysops: This IP address has a history of vandalism. The previous warnings issued to this IP address are here. Thanks. 203.11.167.2 (talk) 04:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jackpack hoax

Actually a PROD has to go before AFD. --Andrewlp1991 (talk) 06:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Wagner

Hi. You responded on my talk page that my revision for Billy Wagner constituted as libel. However, I see no wrong in my edit. All I did was revert the previous edit because it contained the same paragraph from the introduction in his career section. I genuinely see no wrong in not only reverting a reiterating statement, but re-adding good statements about his early baseball career (not his career in general). But, I did not defame Billy Wagner, I'll say that much. Just giving you my perspective on the situation. Thanx. Morea37 (talk) 06:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response

My apologies, man. I didn't see that slander. Morea37 (talk) 06:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Adriana Lima has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. — Senator Palpatine 05:25, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello! I've noticed that you have edited Wikipedia without logging in to an account. It's great that you've been contributing; however, I urge you to create an account. Here is a list of the benefits of having an account:

You can create new pages
You can use watchlists
You can upload images
You can keep your account from being unfairly blocked if you share an IP address
You can use scripts to better fight annoying vandalism
After four days, you can edit semi-protected pages

There are no cons to signing up for an account. In fact, you can find even more pros at the "why create an account" page! Signing up is completely free and you don't need to enter any personal information! Plus you can have a user page, which you can use to show your interests, style, or nearly whatever! So, unless you can think of a con, please sign up for an account right now! Chet B. Long^Talk/_ARK 09:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chet...... 203.11.167.2 (talk) 09:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Command & Conquer: Red Alert 2 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Djsasso (talk) 05:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Template:Dragon Ball games. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Template:Dragon Ball games. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 02:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to World's Most Livable Cities has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 01:41, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Stephen Conroy. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 00:51, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Profit maximization constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Eric-Wester (talk) 04:31, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Marlboro (cigarette) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Maxis ftw (talk) 22:00, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Gregorian calendar has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. RainbowOfLight ^Talk 04:59, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mass spamming of http://spam.dbmmo.com

Accounts

Feb 2009

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Work breakdown structure worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 00:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

The recent edit you made to the page Blackfoot Sue constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Igoldste (talk) 21:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Blackfoot Sue. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. FlyingToaster 23:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Electrician, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Electrician was changed by 203.11.167.2 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-03-26T03:06:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hamlet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cadwaladr (talk) 01:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Cisco Systems. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Lucifer (Talk) 03:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Souvlaki. Alansohn (talk) 03:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 6 months from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Menti fisto 04:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page IPsec has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. AShadowed (talk) 03:39, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of medical roots, suffixes and prefixes. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bfigura ^(talk) 02:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hero, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:44, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dnepropetrovsk maniacs, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Marek.69 ^talk 01:21, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Dnepropetrovsk maniacs. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tommy (msg) 01:21, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dnepropetrovsk maniacs, you will be blocked from editing. Marek.69 ^talk 01:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Kmart Australia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Fumitol (talk) 01:19, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Web 2.0, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Web 2.0 was changed by 203.11.167.2 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-07-19T03:49:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:49, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Web 2.0. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!} 03:53, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. L Kensington (talk • contribs) L Kensington 02:46, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Group dynamics has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Seaphoto^Talk 01:35, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Group dynamics. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Seaphoto^Talk 01:35, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Australian Football League, you may be blocked from editing. MC Rocks (talk) 01:31, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Perforation, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wizard191 (talk) 12:36, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Passive immunity has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 22:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ax Men, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- —UncleDouggie (talk) 12:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Metre Convention. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:32, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:32, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Henri Cartier-Bresson with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tiderolls 01:26, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Thermostat has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. W4chris (talk) 03:13, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Thermostat constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. W4chris (talk) 03:21, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sustainability. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Luke (Talk) 22:57, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Deranged Chamber.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cheers! Stella ^BATPHONE _GROOVES 00:08, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Deranged Chamber concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Deranged Chamber, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:47, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Heathmont College. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DPRoberts534 (talk) 05:21, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Digital Underground constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:29, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Digital Underground with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster _talk 03:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

October 2013

Hello, I'm Philip Trueman. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to SWOT analysis because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Philip Trueman (talk) 02:57, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ford Motor Company of Australia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 01:53, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Cuban missile crisis, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.Antiqueight ^confer 02:13, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alex Bakharev (talk) 02:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your article submission Deranged Chamber

Hello 203.11.167.2. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Deranged Chamber.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Deranged Chamber}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Jacques de Molay, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:11, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.