User talk:208.95.51.53

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

University at Buffalo edits[edit]

Preface: this is a bit moot because another editor has replaced the source with a different one. But I thought I could clear something up about your edits to University at Buffalo. You kept removing 2017 stats that you said were from a source from 2015. But the source you were removing reads like this:

 "UB at a Glance". Buffalo.edu. Retrieved September 12, 2015.

The Retrieved date of something is set using the accessdate= parameter in the {{cite}} template. This merely indicates how recently the URL was actually checked by an editor. It does not necessarily indicate the freshness of the information at that source. As I'm sure you are aware, there are many web pages that contain info that is constantly updated by the owner. This is one of those pages. If you click the link, you'll see it currently contains stats from 2017 and even 2018.

There's a way to separately indicate the date of the information at the source, that is with the date= parameter of the {{cite}} template. Unfortunately that web page doesn't really declare when it was last updated, so its hard to know what to put there.

I thought I would clear that up for you and @ElKevbo: who as I indicated already replaced the source with something from a third party. This was never a hoax, it was merely a misunderstanding about how a date should be interpreted. For future reference, I've updated the source in the article to indicate it contains info up to 2018 as of today, by populating both of those {{cite}} parameters.

Cheers. --Krelnik (talk) 17:07, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know very well what the accessdate thing does. It's a statement that you read the source on the date in question and that it had the information in question at that time. Such a statement is obviously wrong in this kind of situation, and it must not be tolerated. 208.95.51.53 (talk) 17:20, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Um, okay. So why didn't you check the source to verify that the referenced data was correct on the page, and then update the accessdate= parameter to reflect the date when you checked? Clearly those statistics are useful to readers of the article, and deleting them simply because the editor before you neglected to update a date parameter is not super productive. Please try to assume good faith when editing. Thank you. --Krelnik (talk) 14:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm AWhiteC. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to R. H. C. Davis have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. AWhiteC (talk) 19:14, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, 208.95.51.53. You have new messages at Talk:Azad Kashmir.
Message added 15:57, 22 October 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DBigXray 15:57, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question[edit]

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:15, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I had actually seen it already, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Diacritic&type=revision&diff=866284546&oldid=865377261. 208.95.51.53 (talk) 12:45, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

Thanks for noticing the problem with the section headings in Mississippi River and filling out the edit request. I took care of it. Cheers, BlackcurrantTea (talk) 06:10, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1503 papal conclave has been accepted[edit]

1503 papal conclave, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:34, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from CASSIOPEIA[edit]

Hello, 208.95.51.53. You have new messages at CASSIOPEIA's talk page.
Message added 01:25, 13 June 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 01:25, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George of Hanover has been accepted[edit]

George of Hanover, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:11, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wonder Woman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93 Message me. 23:41, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Eagles247. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Todd Heap have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:09, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ça Ira (disambiguation) has been accepted[edit]

Ça Ira (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 18:18, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]