Jump to content

User talk:2600:4041:54BD:E800:79C7:2EA7:4E9F:48D2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Giraffer. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Perpetual stew—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 19:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the page you link (Depths of Wikipedia) is about the account, not the person behind the account. It's the same person doing both things but the article isn't particularly relevant in this case. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 19:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Depths of Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Making bad faith accusations such as "hating" is not okay and will result in a report and eventual block. You are most welcome to make good contributions without attacking others. Bedivere (talk) 19:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Perpetual stew. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 19:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not label our edits as vandalism.

[edit]

Hello,

This is a gentle reminder to not label our edits vandalism. Upon looking at your edits, we thought they were vandalism, and after discussing it together, it turns out they are not. Apologies for that, but that is still not a given to call our edits vandalism, just because we made an honest mistake. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 19:40, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. It won't happen again. 2600:4041:54BD:E800:79C7:2EA7:4E9F:48D2 (talk) 19:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 20:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:4041:54BD:E800:79C7:2EA7:4E9F:48D2 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

You were indeed edit warring. Your addition was in good faith, but you still shouldn't edit war. The false belief was that you were vandalizing, which you were not. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 20:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Other editors apologized for falsely believing I was edit-warring. I was not.

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Perpetual stew, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bedivere (talk) 15:44, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Neither you or Bedivere are vandals. You both need to stop templating each other, and discuss the content. PhilKnight (talk) 15:51, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Perpetual stew, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ☀DefenderTienMinh⛤☯☽ (talk) 15:56, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.