Jump to content

User talk:2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Hoax Slayer. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in. If you like, you can create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 05:14, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, Melcous, here's another bio that's been tended for maybe 15 years by COI accounts. Not the worst, but feel free to have a look. And very happy holiday! 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29 (talk) 01:45, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What makes the Reuters incident noteworthy?

[edit]

The Reuters addition smells like an agenda section [6]. Would appreciate your thoughts, Drmies, Ohnoitsjamie. In the history of journalism, this hardly rates mention among ethical misjudgments. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29 (talk) 04:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, have a look at this when you have nothing better. Edit warring since September over 'transphobic'. My take is it's not a WP:BLP violation, since a lot of sources describe Rowling's views this way. Whitewash? Also, are the IPs related? Your thoughts welcome. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29 (talk) 17:16, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. Any thoughts on this, Drmies? Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29 (talk) 16:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Late night horror--when you are online and have the time, Drmies.....I would pare this to the bone. Mostly promotional and unsourced, but if I take a knife to it, you know. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29 (talk) 05:55, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No emergency, but another one that could profit from more attention, Drmies: Destrehan High School. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29 (talk) 15:00, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Topic

[edit]

Hello, Drmies. I got no traction with this user at AIV [7]; see edit history as well as their responses at talk and user page. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29 (talk) 16:46, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, back from block, continuing disruption. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29 (talk) 12:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: AIV report

[edit]

My apologies, saw that after I replied. Have blocked. Best, SpencerT•C 06:23, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, Melcous, more eyes, please. A good quality article under friendly assault by an inexperienced good faith editor. Thanks. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29 (talk) 18:19, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New incarnation

[edit]

Just when I was getting used to being 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:E0F2:60F2:2CA5:73B6 (talk) 05:57, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Drmies, for dealing with another flaming bag I left at your doorstep. Wishing you all the best for the holidays. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:F43D:C298:4097:A5C8 (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]