User talk:2601:204:C201:C1E0:486:F262:586B:118D

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (2601:204:C201:C1E0:486:F262:586B:118D) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! OhKayeSierra (talk) 23:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you recently removed content from Winona Ryder without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Perhaps you should actually read the cited source before removing something and saying that it needs to be sourced. Meters (talk) 00:33, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Winona Ryder, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Per WP:BRD take it to talk. We have a source for this. You claim that there are sources that contradict it? Well, lets see them. Meters (talk) 03:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Samuel Goldwyn Jr., you may be blocked from editing. Please stop removing correct and easily sourced material. If you want to request a source just tag the claim. You have done this on more than one article. Meters (talk) 03:50, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please read WP:POV. There is no need to make a point of how short a time someone attended a school, particularly when you don't source the claim. Meters (talk) 03:54, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to Winona Ryder. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello & Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon

Do you have a source for this edit by any chance? Regards, JustBerry (talk) 00:06, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Hello, I'm Mosstacker. I noticed that you recently removed content from Afghan–Sikh Wars without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mosstacker (talk) 03:55, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your edit summary

Hey, no need to call out @Mosstacker: in the edit summary. You were reverted because you removed content without a proper explanation (and consensus is also nice). Also, your edit summaries are appearing to be slightly hostile. I would recommend that you read up on WP:NPA before you talk about people in the edit summary.

Thanks, EggRoll97 (talk) 04:24, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 05:03, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Hello, I'm Kleuske. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Afghan–Sikh Wars that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 08:10, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

A friendly word of caution

Some of your recent edit summaries have been pushing the envelope in terms of WP:CIVIL and it was raised at AIV. I have declined the report, but you really do need to tone it down a bit. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:47, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Gurmit Singh, you may be blocked from editing. Once again I see you are removing sourced content and claiming in your edit summary that the material is unsourced. Meters (talk) 18:24, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Casey Wasserman. Stop removing sourced content with false edit summaries claiming hte material is not sourced Meters (talk) 18:33, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Hut 8.5 18:29, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm BonjourPinang. I noticed that you recently removed content from Malaysian Chinese without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. bonjourPinang (talk) 00:07, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Parmjit Dhanda. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:17, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Divorce demography, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:13, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

February 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Erik Prince. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. Tarl N. (discuss) 02:57, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to William Wang, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Removing all categories on a page is generally frowned upon. Kirbanzo (talk) 04:06, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit summaries

Please remember to be civil in your edit summaries. They seem to be written in a somewhat harsh tone. There's no need to include messages to "trolls".

It might also be more understandable to write "Removing unsourced content" or "Needs a citation" instead of "No links" (which I didn't understand). You can also add a {{citation needed}} to unsourced content.

Thank you. – Þjarkur (talk) 01:11, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to William Wang, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 05:45, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Bleed India with a Thousand Cuts. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Bleed India with a Thousand Cuts. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:39, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Akal Takht, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. JimVC3 (talk) 00:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2001–02 India–Pakistan standoff, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 01:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Bleed India with a Thousand Cuts. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Meters (talk) 05:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 07:50, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed content from Brothel without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please discuss on talk page before removing citations. Peaceray (talk) 01:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Disruptive editing - large scale deletions

@RegentsPark, Drmies, and Bbb23: this IP user is making large scale deletion in massive scale without discussion or valid reason(s). I tried reverting lots of it back, but it is too much. As you can see, the IP was warned many times. It is still continuing. I or other users just don't have time to clean or revert this massive amount of deletion. Please help. (Highpeaks35 (talk) 00:19, 20 April 2019 (UTC))

Kautilya3, you are a senior editor, can you assist? I can't undo this mess by myself. Or if you can recommend how I can get help? (Highpeaks35 (talk) 00:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC))

• Sorry, but at least their last two edits are accompanied by edit summaries that seem to make sense. Drmies (talk) 00:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Drmies, yes, that is why I did not revert those. But, there are tons of problematic edits. I will monitor this IP for now. Thank you. (Highpeaks35 (talk) 00:28, 20 April 2019 (UTC))

April 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pakistani textbooks controversy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 18:31, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Template:Philosophy sidebar, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 21:48, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fakir. Pbroks13 (talk) 02:54, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wheat flour, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Did you actually read the content you removed? They are wheat flours Meters (talk) 05:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---