Jump to content

User talk:2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:BDD8:5E1C:3E77:A8E6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Joseph2302. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Joseph2302 serious question, are your familiar with the policies surrounding speedy deletion? 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:BDD8:5E1C:3E77:A8E6 (talk) 22:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I am, but your speedy deletion tags are ridiculous, and 50% of all your edits according to your contributions list are on redirects I've created. That appears to me to be a case of stalking, please explain how this is not the case. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
50%? Can you do basic math? Just today that isn't even true, I mean my contribution history is literally linked in my sig, and as you have repeatedly pointed out in your baseless allegations, I edit from a range that has literally thousands of edits where I am the majority, though not sole, contributor. Please provide diffs showing harassment, as I have said before, put up or shut up, otherwise its simply WP:ASPERSIONS which I will ignore. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:BDD8:5E1C:3E77:A8E6 (talk) 22:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's been 50+% on some of your other IP addresses. My question remains: what is your problem with me, as most of your deletion requests have been rejected, and you seem to me requesting of deletion requests created by me disproportionately often? Why? Joseph2302 (talk) 22:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Most is untrue, even as applies to you. Since I always leave the required notices, this is easy this was deleted, this was retargeted which is not the same as keep, this was deleted. this was retargeted. Jury is still out on this. In every case thus far where we have disagreed on whether or not a redirect was poorly targeted the community has agreed with me.
And no you have not been disproportionately targeted though you may be more likely to come up do the fact that I don't filter on autopatrolled users. I start RFDs all the time however, including the same day I tagged your most recent page for speedy [1]. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:BDD8:5E1C:3E77:A8E6 (talk) 22:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also didn't realise that that redirect has a spelling mistake, so agree in this case only that it is an implausible target. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not trying to be difficult here, but maybe a little less WP:ABF would go a long way. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:BDD8:5E1C:3E77:A8E6 (talk) 22:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]