Jump to content

User talk:2A00:23C5:250E:7801:8558:C3AC:A85D:5A9D

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! DDMS123 (talk) 20:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DDMS123 having made edits and summary for posts they have been deleted re: "tornado pilot" pic that served in two tours of duty and constantly been deleted by a "jobs worth" that's obviously never served,you also ask for donations to keep wikipedia going,I don't think so matey boy!!! 2A00:23C5:250E:7801:8558:C3AC:A85D:5A9D (talk) 21:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Hello, I'm Clyde H. Mapping. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Royal Air Force—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Clyde H. Mapping (talk) 06:24, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Air Force. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DDMS123 (talk) 19:04, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Air Force, you may be blocked from editing. DDMS123 (talk) 19:15, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Air Force. DDMS123 (talk) 04:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Euryalus (talk) 06:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
Hi. I've temporarily blocked this IP address to call a brief halt to disruptive edits to the Royal Air Force article. I think your edits to the Royal Air Force article are in good faith, but many of them have messed up the page syntax or introduced fairly unnecessary elements like poorly captioned images or the "100th anniversary" pic. When edits are reverted the best course is to go to the article talkpage to discuss and reach consensus (see for example WP:BRD). If agreement is reached there, the edit can be added to the page. Hope this is helpful, and all the best with your editing after the block expires. -- Euryalus (talk) 06:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]