Jump to content

User talk:2A00:23C8:AB80:8001:85CA:64C7:5D2:E5F1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm PohranicniStraze. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wepwawetemsaf have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:29, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:31, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm PohranicniStraze. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Iry-Hor that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:32, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wepwawetemsaf. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 09:45, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:14, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

The activity at Wepwawetemsaf and the comments at Talk:Wepwawetemsaf are not acceptable. You will be blocked if there is any further edit warring. Do not use talk pages to attack other editors. See assume good faith and the civility policy. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 11:02, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
@2a00:x:You've still got some explaining to do for this edit [1]. Do we need to block this range for longer? Acroterion (talk) 12:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'll give it the 31 hours, and if it spins up after then absolutely. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:40, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]