User talk:37.0.81.238

February 2024

Hello, I'm Renewal6. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Salome have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Renewal6 (talk) 13:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jordanhill School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 10:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jordanhill School, you may be blocked from editing. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 10:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at St Thomas Aquinas Secondary School, Glasgow, you may be blocked from editing. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 09:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gendered associations of pink and blue. Mathglot (talk) 06:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: R.K. Ram (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read the previous comment. All the inappropriate sources from last time are still there, with three new, equally inappropriate ones, added.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:R.K. Ram and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 10:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 37.0.81.238! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 10:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have used sources that are either clearly noted as paid placement, unmarked press releases or marketing content, or blatant fake content farms which house unmarked SEO placement. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. These sources step far beyond those policies. Please carefully evaluate your references in the future, and ensure that you are in compliance with our mandatory paid editing disclosures. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

foxinterviewer.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.foxinterviewer.com

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.