User talk:66.226.46.5

Attention:

This IP address, 66.226.46.5, is registered to Yadkin Valley Telephone. In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report.

If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time.

If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.

Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (66.226.46.5) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 00:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mania (comics), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 23:32, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Doing the same thing over and over[edit]

Max Landis wrote a couple comics, but that is not what he's known for, so that doesn't belong in the opening sentence about him. Repeating the same edit over and over isn't going to get it to "stick"... and will more likely just get you blocked. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 01:11, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Wallyfromdilbert. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, James Wan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 19:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

National varieties of English[edit]

Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. DBaK (talk) 01:18, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Scott Lobdell, without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a type of change that other editors should be allowed to comment on. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:20, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hellboy II: The Golden Army, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 21:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Go-Tsumaroki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Max Landis have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Go-Tsumaroki (chat) 22:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Meg Donnelly. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:33, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

And yet, the information was put back on there by someone else, yet I get bitched at. Yeah, I get it. I see how it is.

November 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Trailblazer101. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:Spider-Women (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Detective Pikachu (film), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:41, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at King Kong (2005 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 00:53, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Define reliable source outside of obvious info of it being a reboot of the film series? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.226.46.5 (talk • contribs)

You need a reliable source that actually calls the film a "reboot". DonIago (talk) 17:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Brian K. Vaughan, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 05:57, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Such-change47 (talk) 12:44, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. An edit you recently made to A Nightmare on Elm Street seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 02:45, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Army of Darkness, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 05:36, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Army of Darkness, you may be blocked from editing. DonIago (talk) 17:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2022[edit]

Hello, I wanted to let you know that I removed your addition to the lead section of Ant-Man (film) because it did not seem important enough to be in the lead section. The information is already contained in the body of the article. – Popo Dameron talk 21:37, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Army of Darkness, you may be blocked from editing. DonIago (talk) 02:50, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gee, Army of Darkness sure has the scale of a epic to me, the medieval setting, the grand army of the dead lead by a evil overlord, evil book of spells, protag from a different time period, that sounds like a fantasy epic to me

Maybe, JUST MAYBE, could you not be a rigid prick about it? For God sakes, what got your nuts in a knot if it qualifies as an epic alongside comedy horror or not? "Poorly sourced", this sounds like something personal instead of "upholding policy" 66.226.46.5 (talk) 23:54, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, JUST MAYBE you should consider that we use reliable sources to describe a film's genres, not our personal views? Especially considering that a source has already been provided which doesn't list the film as an "epic" film and you are now edit-warring over the matter. Per WP:BRD, you're welcome to discuss the matter at the article's Talk page.

I would also recommend that you read WP:NPA since you don't appear to be aware of it. DonIago (talk) 05:49, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Society (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Exactly as per my edit summary in the reversion. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:37, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Aquaman (film), you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:03, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Atomic Monster Productions. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You'd block me and strip the edits even if I did provide a source 66.226.46.5 (talk) 18:41, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Trailblazer101. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Trailblazer101 (talk) 22:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Glacialfox (talk) 20:21, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's NOT vandalism AT ALL. That's just biased statements that are pretty accurate to the general reception

Stop bullshitting 66.226.46.5 (talk) 15:07, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm InfiniteNexus. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:30, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hannibal Rising (film). You've been warned several times to stop adding TV shows that have nothing to do with Hannibal Rising (film) to the article's lead, but you ignore the warnings and always come back with a different IP doing the same thing over and over. Stop! Zoolver (talk) 10:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Your most recent policy violations, which you commmitted with these edits to Mark Millar, which includes adding uncited material on a controversial matter, and the removal of a value from the article's Infobox without a stated rationale, have been reverted. Since it is clear that you do not intend to follow the various policies that I and others have been warning you about here since at least as far back as July 2019, I will contact an administrator regarding this. Nightscream (talk) 17:48, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 18:37, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2023[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Transformers (film series), but you didn't provide any reliable source(s). It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. -Fnlayson (talk) 02:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Alien: Romulus. Mike Allen 01:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2024[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Iron Man 2, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MCU character infoboxes[edit]

Please note that the "adapted" field only includes writers who penned the character's first appearance. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I figured it meant every screenwriter

or director who adapted them to screen

66.226.46.5 (talk) 16:33, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hidden warnings[edit]

Please make sure to read hidden warning comments when making changes.[1] If it says anything like "Please do NOT change this wording" then you should probably read the talk page and WP:DISCUSS before making any changes. Please also make sure to explain clearly why you believe your changes are improvement. Please note that the WP:LEAD section is supposed to summarize and clearly explain things to readers, expanding an already pedantic and awkward attempt to explain continuity is not an improvement. First think of the readers. -- 109.79.166.4 (talk) 21:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Voorts. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Norman Osborn (Sam Raimi film series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Duke Thomas (character), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Golem08 (talk) 20:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.