User talk:68.104.163.254

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 68.104.163.254, has made edits that do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Help contents – the main help page.
Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Sundayclose (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm CodeTalker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Priesthood in the Catholic Church, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 22:14, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ok i will provide the source give me till the end of today and everything will be fully provided — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.104.163.254 (talk) 22:18, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Transubstantiation, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 16:17, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Citations are required at the time that you make the edit, not just when you can get around to it. Please don't make an edit without a citation. Sundayclose (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12/19/2021[edit]

I posted and took half of my day literally with correct proper citation and sources as wikipedia mentioned.

you erased everything I wrote including from books, I give you three days to correct this because it was in proper citation everything I wrote with direct and very extremely authoritative sources from books including catholic websites where for example I mentioned that transubstantiations is a catholic term.

if this issue does not get resolved I will post in youtube and other websites internationally so that catholic along with eastern orthodox communities worldwide we will defund your website and will list it as misinformation list and then it will be banned in different governments. I do have that sort of ability.

you choose.....

I provided everything sources it took a half day. you want me to play the hard way we will do it and when your website gets completely defunded and shut down and then another organization will buy it. and then you will be frustrated. you choose correct it or else i will go public and post it not only in youtube because we know youtube also takes down websites but other international websites as well.

you have three days to correct it i am not giving more chances i worked very very hard and even followed the proper form of citation but because you did not liked the content and you hate the catholic church you decided to remove everything including the proper citation i will find a way to get it to the highest member in wikipedia at whatever expense. if you do not the issue i will post those videos with proof and i ma not bluffing i have screenshots i suspected this would happen

you told me to place the citation of the source correctly I complied and did not complain at first because i knew i was wrong and then i did followed every single instruction as wikipedia required it and then you still decided to reverse the changes to misconstrue and also to make the catholic church look wrong and even you willfully provided misinformation.

if you'd like we can make it ban this website in England, Poland, Germany, Russia, Ukraine, Mexico and many other nations i will speak all the languages necessary to defund wikipedia with the truth and proof you choose...

I took screen shots in case I get banned and will provide it in youtube among other websites as well.

i will escalate this matter to info-en@wikimedia.org if you do not fix it in three days. and i did provided sources plenty of sources.... it is all attached the admin will further review

If you make dozens and dozens of edits, mixing sourced with unsourced information, no one is obliged to sort through all of those edits to clean up after you. And you continued adding unsourced information after you were told to stop. My warning stands. If you bother to cite sources in the first place this won't happen. You don't intimidate me or any part of Wikipedia by claiming that you have "that kind of power" to post on YouTube, and when you do so it undermines your credibility here. Before making such pointless and ineffective threats, I suggest that you read WP:YANI and WP:HIGHMAINT.

All of that being said, if you will pay attention to warnings, take it slowly, and not assume you have a special entitlement, you can make positive contributions. I am adding a welcome notice to the top of this talk page which can help you if you will actually click the links and read the policies. If you have questions about how things work here, you also can place {{helpme}} on this talk page and someone will come along to help. I also strongly urge you to create an account. It's quick and free, and it has many advantages. Sundayclose (talk) 18:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

actually it has been sourced i already escalated this matter to admin they will see what happened, and i sent them screenshots of everything everything i did took half my day literally i provided Sources plenty of resources which they will see in the attachment of the PDF page I sent.

it would have been nice to leave everything as it was and send me a message instead of reverting everything so i can begin again i did showed the screen shot of the edits as well.

I followed this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_book format

in case everythign gets erased in the admin section do not worry i took a screen shot to send it via email as well .......

nice okay let's do this then. ....

i never sued with court but i will publish it and you will be defunded i promise. do not worry this block is proof of the anti catholic sentiments of wikipedia and it claims to be 'unbiased'.

Nowhere does Wikipedia claim to be unbiased. Everyone has biases. Wikipedia claims to have a neutral point of view, which is different. 331dot (talk) 18:43, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You would not be the first to do anti-Wikipedia activism. However, you may be more successful in the future by being more careful and reading what other editors write, as well as the Wikipedia policies they link. Editors are also of many backgrounds, including Catholicism, but all must leave that aside when editing and work with sources that are considered acceptable. It is normal for unsourced material to get reverted (WP:CITE). If sources are considered inappropriate by other editors (WP:RS), the WP:RSN noticeboard may be useful to obtain the input of the community on specific sources to support specific material. Something to remember is also WP:NODEADLINE, results may not be immediate and patience is required. Wikipedia being community-edited, it requires a collaborative attitude. WP:DR may also be useful on how to handle disputes. —Paleo Neonate – 20:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding: WP articles also are subject to a style guide (WP:MOS) and it would be inappropriate for them to use language like "our Lord" (their intended audience are not only Catholic) and to directly cite Biblical verses without also citing a secondary source that interprets them (WP:PRIMARY, WP:OR). —Paleo Neonate – 21:06, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i provided sources do not worry i already send to different countries copy and proof of our conversation. it was not unsourced your allegation of supposedly i being unsourced is biased and is false, it is true misinformation.. I sent a pdf copy even so they can take a look. collaborative attitude begins with truth not with slandering nor false information....

by the way I am catholic and the sources i cited it was directly from even the Catechism of the council of trent, cathechism of the catholic church and my cathodic faith and baltimore catechism and other websites.

now you can ban me i am not going to retract but when your site gets banned in catholic and orthodox countries then you will want to make a correction I will forgive you. but i will not negotiate, until wikipedia offers a public apology to the catholic community and eastern orthodox community for misinformation.

I don't think it owes you an apology, but if you would like to be unblocked, you should file an unblock request, clearly retract any statement that sounded like a legal threat, per WP:NLT and WP:APPEAL. WP:NOTTHEM may also be useful. If you edit again in the future, I also suggest to try WP:CATHOLICISM, a WikiProject with the aim of improving Catholicism related articles. This will be my last comment here for now, but if you are unblocked I'm still open to help with WP-related advice. —Paleo Neonate – 22:51, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for legal threats. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 18:30, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.