Jump to content

User talk:80.57.2.97

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Prairie Astronomer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Vicky Krieps, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Prairie Astronomer Contributions 15:54, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you dislike the truth, marxist? 80.57.2.97 (talk) 15:55, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It may or may not be the truth, I really don't know, but you were removing a cited section and adding in uncited information. Prairie Astronomer Contributions 15:57, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That is is factually incorrect. 80.57.2.97 (talk) 18:28, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I am not a marxist. Prairie Astronomer Contributions 15:57, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vicky Krieps, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Prairie Astronomer Contributions 16:20, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2023

[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Laci Mosley, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Kentucky Fried Chicken murders. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. TriskySeskel (talk) 18:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Hello, I'm Novo Tape. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kentucky Fired Chicken murders have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)My Talk Page 18:27, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


May 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hasanlu Lovers, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Matt Deres (talk) 22:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Nagol0929. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nicholas Winton without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:13, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jean-de-Nivelle. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Anne Hidalgo, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 15:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2024

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for making personal attacks towards other editors.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 15:32, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

80.57.2.97 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Nothing I posted was a personal attack or harassment. Stop making things up because you don't like it.

Decline reason:

Inaccurate. Talk page access revoked.Ponyobons mots 18:39, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.