User talk:81.106.202.47

March 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Lazylaces. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Hollesley— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lazylaces (Talk to me) 17:41, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hollesley. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hollesley was changed by 81.106.202.47 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967385 on 2016-03-12T17:42:18+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:42, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Xender Lourdes. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Richard Hammond has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Xender Lourdes (talk) 09:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2016[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Hollesley]]. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Twiceuponatime (talk) 09:12, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Amortias. Your recent edit to the page United States presidential election in Wyoming, 1992 appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 21:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm J349. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to United Kingdom general election, 1992 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. J349 [Talk!] 10:36, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United_Kingdom_general_election,_1992. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. J349 [Talk!] 10:38, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hollesley, you may be blocked from editing. J349 [Talk!] 10:39, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at United Kingdom general election, 1992. J349 [Talk!] 10:40, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:46, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

June 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm DJAustin. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Party of European Socialists— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DJAustin (talk) 17:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at United Kingdom general election, 2017, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:12, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Haier. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Simplexity22 (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Plaid Cymru, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 10:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Socialist Party of Great Britain. Jim1138 (talk) 10:09, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm KGirlTrucker81. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to United States presidential election, 1952— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 15:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at United Kingdom general election, 2017. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to United States presidential election, 2012. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sb2001 ^{talk page} 18:15, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism. Page blanking, addition of random text or spam, repeated tripping of the edit filter, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. Your block will expire in one week. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Malinaccier (talk) 18:57, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.106.202.47 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it was not me that made the edit, it was someone else that lives in the walls of the property 81.106.202.47 (talk) 14:24, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, that is probable. But, since you have a vandal on the property, we can't unblock your IP address. That would allow the vandal to continue vandalizing. If you want to edit, please register an account. If the block prevents you from creating account, go to WP:ACC. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm 99.53.112.186. An edit that you recently made to Ieuan Wyn Jones seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 99.53.112.186 (talk) 20:01, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to United Kingdom general election, 2017 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.106.202.47 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is no genuine reason to why i was blocked, all i did was edit the US presidential election 2016 in Mississippi to the correct numbers., I believe this person blocked me because of spite jealousy, and even if this number has been proved wrong, that does not deserve a block for 3 MONTHS. 81.106.202.47 (talk) 10:36, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The simple and child-like vandalism from this IP is obvious. Increasing the block length when there is a repeating pattern is standard practice. Kuru (talk) 11:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment for reviewing admin: please notice [1] and [2]. This kind of vandalism has been going on for months (see 16 June, 16 February). Vanjagenije (talk) 11:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.106.202.47 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You're the simple one wasting your life on fucking wikipedia

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 12:25, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.