User talk:81.174.242.34

December 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Natasha Andersen with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Piast93 22:51, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Natasha Andersen with this edit. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 22:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Natasha Andersen with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Piast93 22:59, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Natasha Andersen, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Natasha Andersen was changed by 81.174.242.34 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.942549 on 2011-12-16T23:00:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:00, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 23:06, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Hollyoaks characters (1995–96), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Hollyoaks characters (1995–96) was changed by 81.174.242.34 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902308 on 2011-12-21T16:32:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:32, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Hollyoaks Dates Question

Hello, where are you finding your dates for Hollyoaks from? :)Rain the 1 22:30, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

I would also like to know this. Please do not remove sections from lists as well, even if it is only a link to the page of a character introduced in that year. D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

To reply to this message all you need to do is edit the talk page and then save it. If you don't reply and state as source when can't take your edits as being reliable and we will have to change the dates back. D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:21, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

If you are not willing to verify with a source or atleast reveal where you are finding your information from - then we have to remove it per WP:OR. So could you please leave a reply. Thankyou.Rain the 1 20:34, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of Hollyoaks characters (1997) with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 20:31, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of Hollyoaks characters (1995–96). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Rain the 1 22:39, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Hollyoaks characters (1995-96), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. please don't add unsourced dates to the list. D4nnyw14 (talk) 17:57, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Hollyoaks characters (1995-96). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. D4nnyw14 (talk) 23:17, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Hollyoaks characters (1995–96), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rain the 1 22:56, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. AngelOfSadness talk 22:42, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:15, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Shakespears Sister 'Hello (Turn Your Radio On)'

Hi, I removed the content you added to the "Hello (Turn Your Radio On)" article because it did not seem important enough for the article/encyclopedic to add specific details about what happens in the video, to state that it was a 'top 15' hit when the peak of #14 is already mentioned, to add information on the critical reception with no sources/references provided, and to use un-encyclopedic language such as long run-on sentences linked with 'and'. Furthermore, your reverting of my edit has re-instated a dead URL link for the UK chart peaks, and removed relevant wikipedia page links for the art-designer and photographer of the single sleeve, and the video director, which is a nonconstructive edit. I notice you have some previous warnings about adding unsourced material to wikipedia and blockings for vandalism. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hello (Turn Your Radio On). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nqr9 (talk) 00:25, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Hello (Turn Your Radio On), did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. NC4PK (talk) 20:13, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016

Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Heinz Burt, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 14:57, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Leslie Van Houten, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TJRC (talk) 05:52, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Murder of Pamela Buckley and James Freund—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 20:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Murder of Pamela Buckley and James Freund. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 20:54, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

---