User talk:94.213.112.113

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, 94.213.112.113, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! – XLinkBot (talk) 17:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

December 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Pantsir-S1 has been reverted.
Your edit here to Pantsir-S1 was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed () is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Reference errors on 21 December[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stalingrad-class battlecruiser[edit]

Where is this extra 20 mm of armor that you keep adding? I do not see why you keep adding this info because it does not appear to be backed up in your source. This is the relevant sentence from the source that you cited: Главный броневой пояс цитадели (протяженность 57,6 % длины корабля по КВЛ) выполнялся из свариваемой 180-мм гомогенной брони, имел угол наклона от вертикали 15° и защищал борт ниже средней 70—75-мм главной броневой палубы; I made a lot of changes to the article than just deleting this mysterious 20 mm, so I'm going to revert your changes once more. Be advised that reverting my changes once again will cause you to break the WP:3RR rule and be blocked from editing entirely. Please discuss your reasoning for adding this information either here or on the article's talk page before doing anything precipitous.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:06, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Again, look at the the Ship Armour Scheme. http://www.e-reading.club/illustrations/1002/1002749-p0084.png

What do you see behind the 180 mm belt. Another 20 mm.

Here i even highlighted it for you http://i.imgur.com/E4wTf2q.png

OK, thanks for pointing that out. I think that's an interior splinter plate, but let me see what my English-language sources say about it. Unfortunately, I'm away from them at the moment, but I should be able to get back to them within a week. Please refrain from making any more changes until I get a chance to evaluate the evidence. In general, however, I tend to try and keep the infobox as simple as possible and I may leave it as is and expand the description in the text appropriately.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The plate is not mentioned in my English-language source, nor is it mentioned in the text of your Russian-language source; it's only referenced in the cross-sectional armor diagram. Therefore I don't see any need to add it to the article since it's not discussed in the sources.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]