User talk:99.245.168.121

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Kleuske (talk) 10:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to PPP Canada—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:56, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The institution is dissolved, so I was just changing the wording to past-tense. --99.245.168.121 (talk) 12:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disparaging messages on talk pages

When interacting with other users on Wikipedia, there is an expectation that we keep a level of respect and consideration in our dialogue. However, the responses you have been giving to edit requests on Talk:Muhammad have gone against this policy, with the messages in fact having bordered on abusive. There is no requirement for any particular user to reply to an edit request, so if you do not believe you can maintain a collegial attitude with these new users, I advise that you refrain from responding at all.
Alivardi (talk) 11:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware of the Wikipedia rules. I did make a reply to a number of edit requests on Talk:Muhammad, but only one really I think was borderline abusive. The one which you replied too. Alright, I apologize for that, and if the others were also abusive, for them too (though I don't think they were). I'm just getting really tired of this demand like every month (that's been going on for like 10+ years) when Wikipedia has made clear that the Muhammad images are acceptable. --99.245.168.121 (talk) 12:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history at Structure of the Canadian federal government shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
WP:There are no deadlines

Listed for third opinion. --99.245.168.121 (talk) 15:35, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.