User talk:ADITYA1811200

October 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Majhraut Ahir—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Majhraut Ahir, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 13:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hi ADITYA1811200! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Majhraut Ahir several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Majhraut Ahir, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Also see WP:LISTPEOPLE, which is the rationale behind why I have reverted your edits.. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ram Lakhan Singh Yadav, you may be blocked from editing. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

how much you know Shere-Bihar Ram Lakhan Singh Yadav? Ram Lakhan Singh Yadav belong to Majhraut Ahirs or Yadav and my province, my constituency, my assembly. As well as He is my close relative. My knowledge about Ram Lakhan Singh Yadav is very accurate and precise. I know his all family members including his son Prakash Chandra, his grandson jayvardhan Singh very closely. Our relation is very close. Don't grab the heritage of Majhraut Ahir or Yadav legacy. These people are legend of Majhraut Ahir. These person are our icons. So don't mitigate our history of heritage. I request you either to include our people based on accurate and precise knowledge by thoroughly study or let us include on my deep rooted knowledge of my caste and society. ADITYA1811200 (talk) 01:38, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you are closely connected to the subjects of articles, you should not be editing those articles at all.

In either case, all additions to Wikipedia must be well-sourced, and personal experience is not a valid source. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please stop spreading and broadcasting false information about my icons belong to my caste. Otherwise you should prepare to face music. Because these person are my close relative. You must include the name of person in the list of notable persons of Majhraut Ahirs Otherwise you erase these page from Wikipedia. If you don't do so, I must go to judiciary to lodge a case on you for defaming our caste icon. ADITYA1811200 (talk) 02:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What "false information" do you think is being "broadcast" here? All that's being asked is that you 1. Provide reliable sources for any information you make, and 2. Comply with the conflict of interest policy by not editing articles where you have a close connection to the subject. AntiDionysius (talk) 02:07, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, you may be interested to know that merely indicating you may be considering legal action against another user is completely forbidden by Wikipedia policy, and can be grounds for your account being banned. This applies even when the legal threats are completely hollow, as they are in this case. AntiDionysius (talk) 02:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what's your reliable source,I don't know . But I know your knowledge about Ram Lakhan Singh Yadav ' sub caste is very poor and miserable. Please listen me carefully that Ram Lakhan Singh Yadav is not Krishnaut, but Majhraut (Madhuraut). If i have to propagate false information, then I told you Lalu prasad Yadav is also Majhraut but it's well known fact that Lalu Prasad yadav is Kannaujia Yadav.So you don't trust on so called reliable information because Subcaste is very private matter. Very few people know the Subcaste of great person. These facts about Subcaste known only close relative or close associate or private assistant. Information about Subcaste of great person is not mentioned in any reliable source or book or in any written form. Because the great persons don't disclose their subcastial identity since disclosure of subcastial identity in public domain is inferior work. ADITYA1811200 (talk) 02:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know

...how to edit notable person as process adopted by Wikipedia but these persons desreved to get a place in notable people belong to Majhraut Ahir or yadav since these all person belong to my province, my caste and my close relative as well as I know these people very carefully and very closely so my knowledge about caste of these person is very accurate and precise.

Ra ADITYA1811200 (talk) 01:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you don't know how to do it, and there are no reliable secondary sources, then we're at an impasse. This website has rules for its content and requires a (relatively low) level of competence, and I'm afraid both are pretty much necessary. Drmies (talk) 03:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]