User talk:ARCH DAS

Welcome![edit]

Hi ARCH DAS! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 20:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Path slopu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Shiv Dayal Singh—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. PATH SLOPU 12:02, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First of all the wikipedia created of soami ji maharaj with his parental name i.e, considered as unrespectable name for incarnation , at least you must use respectable terminology at other place in this wikipedia page. My edit was more constructive than your revert. ARCH DAS (talk) 12:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, we use the WP:COMMONNAME and do not use honorifics, see WP:NCIN. Hence, lord, shree, maharaj, ji, etc are not used in Wikipedia. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In that , There should be change in policy . what about Guru Nanak, Guru Angad , Guru is not the common name. And There such so many wikipedia page use honorfic word only. e.g, Premanand Ji Maharaj , its not his name while honorfic the wikipedia page etc. Shiv Dayal singh was not his common name , its his parental name. Most people even dont know the name 'Shiv Dayal' . His name was soami ji maharaj only , the only common name. scroll any of the radhasoami sect website. ARCH DAS (talk) 12:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guru Nanak, Guru Angad are proven to be the most used names in the WP:Independent (not associated with the particular faith) third-party reliable English literature, hence WP:COMMONNAMES. Which doesn't seem to be the case with Shiv Dayal Singh skimming through scholarly books in the internet, which is why the article(s) is named that way. "Radhasoami sect" would not be independent third-party source here. Secondly, honorifics are allowed when the WP:COMMONNAME uses that in third-party reliable sources. And if the article name doesn't use it, do not add them honorifics in articles per MOS:HON WP:NCIN. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting and honorifics[edit]

Do not add honorifics to names, see WP:NCIN MOS:HON policies. Also do not use bold, see MOS:BOLDFACE. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:15, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Systems Society of India (June 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Grabup were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Secondary independent reliable sources needed to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Systems Society of India and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GrabUp - Talk 10:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ARCH DAS! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GrabUp - Talk 10:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Systems Society of India (June 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ratnahastin were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Systems Society of India and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]