User talk:A suyash

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Jodhi Bibi" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Jodhi Bibi and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 9#Jodhi Bibi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Manavati (talk) 20:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but you may wish to create a account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, including:

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign and date your comments with four tildes (~~~~). --Bhadani 20:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article deletion[edit]

I notice that you deleted all of the lines in an article. This will always be reversed: it is thought of as vandalism in Wikipedia. A discussion was started on Wikipedia:Help desk#monali dash on how to get this article deleted. You might like to continue the discussion there so you can find out the next step to requesting an article be properly deleted. Notinasnaid 18:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please do not continue to blank the page. Please instead continue the discussion that was started. Blanking the page may get you blocked from Wikipedia, and I am sure you would rather follow the correct procedures to ask for this article to be deleted. Notinasnaid 18:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Are you having trouble finding the help desk? Notinasnaid 19:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps you do not know how to reply to this message. Just click the "Edit" link and add your comments at the end. Notinasnaid 18:27, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baffled[edit]

I must admit I am baffled by how you are carrying on in Wikipedia without taking advice or asking for help, with all your edits being undone almost immediately. You also seem to be adding your signature to an article. Please don't do that: we must sign talk pages but never articles; the article history is used to find who created or edited an article. Notinasnaid 13:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you left a comment on List of states with nuclear weapons. The best place to put comments like that would be on the article's talk page, and it would be best for you to elaborate on the problems that you think the article has. I removed the comment from the article, but I hope you come to the talk page to discuss it. TomTheHand 13:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:New195.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:New195.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Agrasen.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Agrasen.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Yellow.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Yellow.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Yellow_rose.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Yellow_rose.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

India quick links[edit]

utcursch | talk 04:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Black hair.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Black-hair.jpg. The copy called Image:Black-hair.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 20:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Agatha_christie.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Agatha_christie.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:H.r.bachchan.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:H.r.bachchan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Subhadra.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Subhadra.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aksi_great (talk) 06:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Fair-use tends to get a bit confusing. I'll try to explain. Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia should contain images which do not have a copyright tag on it as then people cannot copy material from wikipedia without worrying about licenses. But USA has this special provision for using copyrighted stuff called Fair-use. Under the fair-use law, you can use copyrighted stuff only under some cases without worrying about prior permission. But everytime you use an image under fair-use, you need to add a detailed explanation as to why the image can be used on wikipedia in a way that it satisfies FU laws. You have uploaded Image:Subhadra.jpg. A stamp is the property of the Government. But we can still use it under fair-use if and only if the image is being used to illustrate the stamp in question. Imagine that we have the photo of George Bush on the cover of the Time magazine. We can use a scan of the cover on wikipedia only to illustrate the article/section/paragraph which talks about his appearance on the cover of the magazine. But we cannot use the magazine cover as a replacement for a pic of George Bush. That would violate fair-use. So it you have an article/section/paragraph anywhere talking about the stamp of subhadra kumari chauhan then you can use this image in that article without worrying. But if you use it to just illustrate an article, then it violates fair-use law. So what you need to do now is to add a fair-use rationale as to why the image can be used in the articles where it is being used right now - Postage stamp and List of people on stamps of India. See Image:Harry_potter_stamps.jpg for a good fair-use rationale. You will need to add 2 rationales as there are 2 articles. Hope I have made things clearer than before. Do leave a message on my talk page if you still have any doubts. - Aksi_great (talk) 12:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sketch portrait.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sketch portrait.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Indianwedding.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Indianwedding.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro(talk)(review) 11:23, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Birthdaynikki.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Birthdaynikki.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:27, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geetadevi.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 04:50, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kashmir conflict without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:30, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, A suyash. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Blackblack.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]