User talk:Abgh7654

August 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Zee Bangla, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 04:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarbojoya (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sarbojoya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sarbojoya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 05:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abgh7654! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 05:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, Abgh7654. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Zee Bangla, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2402:3A80:1C46:3BE8:1CE3:DBE0:E07:CAAB (talk) 14:24, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Abgh7654. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Abgh7654. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Abgh7654|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 04:38, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TheBirdsShedTears The user still continues to create article which looks like they are paid. Please see below for more details. Idhika Paul, Aditi Chatterjee, and Dhrubajyoti are all paid articles. What should be done? Itcouldbepossible^Talk 13:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Itcouldbepossible, i am going to ping Celestina007 for their opinion as they are experienced in identifying spam and paid editing. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TheBirdsShedTears Ok no problem. But by common wiki sense I can understand that this is paid editing. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 14:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping TBST, @Itcouldbepossible, Unfortunately I haven’t the time since I’m still at work. But few things to note, is there a specific time range you can recollect as to when you first noticed any dubious looking edits? Are they a new editor but already familiar with wiki-coding and binge creating non notable promotional articles ? Are they a WP:SLEEPER? In any case, there are many ways to address this, the first is easy and explained to me by Bradv, which is to send all sketchy looking promotional articles without RS to AFD. If they still persist, they are in violation of TOU. You can file a report to ANI, as WP:PAID expressly states ANI as a place to report undeclared paid editing, but ensure not to put personal information there, cogent evidence with private data should be sent to the relevant email associated with WP:PAID another option is to report it here, but private data must not be put there also. I’m sorry i’d expound on this when I am back from work, I may forget to, please notify me in the event that I do. Celestina007 (talk) 14:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Celestina007 Well they kept on creating Ayan (actor), Ayan Nayak, and asked everyone to help him make that article. However it is totally promotional. You can also see the delete discussions as well. The thing is too complicated to say, so it is better that you investigate it when you get time. And yes, it looks like they are really familiar with wiki coding. The signature that they use is really complicated. Also as a support, you may take help from this. Thanking you in advance. Yours Itcouldbepossible^Talk 14:38, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mohona Maiti moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mohona Maiti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 17:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Megha Daw

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Megha Daw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2402:3A80:689:72A7:EC6B:2DB9:D6F3:9AC2 (talk) 17:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sourav Saha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sourav Saha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 06:09, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Idhika Paul for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Idhika Paul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idhika Paul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aditi Chatterjee

The article Aditi Chatterjee has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 13:56, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aditi Chatterjee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aditi Chatterjee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aditi Chatterjee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Itcouldbepossible^Talk 02:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Abgh7654, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Abgh7654|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 2402:3A80:1A46:6454:71A2:8CBB:2547:FCD7 (talk) 13:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dhrubajyoti Sarkar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dhrubajyoti Sarkar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhrubajyoti Sarkar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Itcouldbepossible^Talk 13:29, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Megha Daw for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Megha Daw is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megha Daw until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ab207 (talk) 14:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. 2402:3A80:6A0:7FDD:258B:BF1:CD1B:C3DB (talk) 05:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- TNT (talk • she/her) 06:03, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Message removed

I removed a message by a sock. Primefac you may want to look at the page history and block the IP. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 14:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mohona Maiti

Hello, Abgh7654. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mohona Maiti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Idhika Paul

Hello, Abgh7654. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Idhika Paul, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:04, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sourav Saha

Hello, Abgh7654. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sourav Saha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:04, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mohona Maiti

Hello, Abgh7654. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mohona Maiti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:55, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Idhika Paul

Hello, Abgh7654. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Idhika Paul".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:58, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sourav Saha

Hello, Abgh7654. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sourav Saha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Uron Tubri

Hello, Abgh7654. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Uron Tubri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]