User talk:Abhinay.different

Abhinay.different, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Abhinay.different! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your contribution at Palwancha

Hello Abhinay.different, I just reverted your edits from Palwancha due to so many problems (e.g. You removed the Infobox which was well styled, You did not follow Manual of Style guidelines, The article sound so promotional and too many non-rs external links). Please read WP:MOS, WP:EXT, WP:RS and also WP:REFSTART to learn how to cite references before you start again. If you have any question you can ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} then your question on your talk page, a volunteer will assist you. Thank You – GSS (talk) 10:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not revert again. Including all the problems GSS-1987 mentioned, you are copying from other sources. Once cannot copy from other sources as it is a copyright violation. Copyright violations are to be reverted. Bgwhite (talk) 09:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for disruptive editing, failure to heed advice or communicate, and edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:20, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice: You really need to start using talk pages to communicate with other editors, particularly when challenged. If you continue as you have been doing, you will likely be blocked for longer periods of time. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:24, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Telephone Code

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:51, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhinay.different (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your unblock request reason goes here

Decline reason:

Please make a new unblock request, and where it says "your unblock request reason goes here", replace that with the reason you think you should be unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:28, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Abhinay.different, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Palwancha have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 14:40, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]