User talk:Abyssal/Archive 17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PD papers behind paywalls[edit]

Just saw your DML query, there are a lot of PD papers on JSTOR. But remember tyhat the PD-1923 only goes for papers published in the US. If it is a UK paper, for example, the authors have to have died more than 70 years ago. FunkMonk (talk) 19:29, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Borghild Project[edit]

Abyssal, I was wondering whether you were planning to return to this nomination, now that the nominator has responded to your review. If not, please let me know, and I'll look for a new reviewer. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of pathological dinosaur specimens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Natural history museums[edit]

Hello, I am removing the category Paleontology in ... for the natural history museums categories in the US because most of these museums are only tangentially focused on paleontology, but instead focus on animals, plants, geology and the environment. Rather than putting the entire category for each state as a subset of Paleontology in that state, I am linking each museum individually, after looking at the article and website for the museum. I believe this is more appropriate. I am also looking at Category:Paleontological sites of North America and will add articles to the appropriate state paleontology categories.

Your articles on paleontology for each state seem well written and researched, so thanks for such great work. Jllm06 (talk) 01:41, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 16 April[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1912 in paleontology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Lost World. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 22 April[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are your sources please?[edit]

Hi. You are making a considerable number of edits relating to fossil records etc. Please may I ask what sources you are using?DrChrissy (talk) 13:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 30 April[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paleontology in Louisiana, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Epoch and Mississippian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent articles created[edit]

I have to advise you to stop what you're doing for a moment please. It seems that many of the new articles you're creating are the results of cut and paste moves into the main article space. A cut and paste move is undesirable because it erases the edit history of an article. Additionally, it appears that some or all of the new pages you are creating lack a single citation. I would advise you to stop creating articles for a while and in the future use the Articles for Creation process to avoid having any of your articles deleted. Pishcal — ♣ 19:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator's Noticeboard Notice[edit]

Information icon This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Pishcal — ♣ 19:34, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of sauropodomorph type specimens
added a link pointing to Carnegie Museum
Timeline of paleontology in Michigan
added a link pointing to Lincoln Township

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Topic sentences[edit]

I think you should try to rewrite the opening sentences of the various "Paleontology in Foo" articles you recently have created. You would not start an article about Pope Francis by saying "Pope Francis refers to the Pope named Francis." We want to write about what the topic is, not what it refers to; and we should do so in a way that adds information rather than just restating the title of the article. See WP:MOSLEDE for more info. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Timelines[edit]

I hope you have time to fix the several articles about timeslines as they are full of links to disambiguation pages. Like Timeline of ceratopsian research (40x) and many others.

Let me introduce you to Wikipedia:WPCleaner, a very handy tool for finding and solving links to disambiguation pages. The Banner talk 09:24, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. Please correct the disambiguation links in these pages before you create any new pages. It is unlikely that any other editor will be able to get to these in the near future, or to know what you intended by most of these links. bd2412 T 15:08, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

xxxx in paleontology Changes[edit]

I see you are majorly changing the structuring of the xxxx in paleontology pages. I am concerned as you seem to just be adding extra headings in with no indication that you will be expanding on them. Also if you look at 2014 in paleontology and other recent years, the lists are already much to massive to have all of the topics you seem to be wanting to add! I would suggest running the changes by WP:Paleo and WP: biology first.--Kevmin § 15:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where specifically? I dont remember seeing a discussion of it at either spot. I'm still not seeing a rectification of the problem I noted about the expansion and the already massive 201x in paleontology articles.
Edit, found it. Im not convinced one reply from Funkmonk constitutes well received, I suggest reopening the discussion and pinging the active members of Paleo Dino and the recent contributors to the xxxx in paleo articles themselves to see what opinion actually is. I personally am not in favor of the info being shoehorned into the existing article structure. --Kevmin § 18:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timeline of ceratopsian research for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of ceratopsian research is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of ceratopsian research until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 22:16, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Timeline of tyrannosaur research[edit]

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Category in decade[edit]

Template:Category in decade has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. NSH002 (talk) 02:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Timeline of ceratopsian research[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Timeline of ceratopsian research at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Timeline of dromaeosaurid research[edit]

Every article helps - thanks Victuallers (talk) 20:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Timeline of ichthyosaur research[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Timeline of ichthyosaur research at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! MelanieN (talk) 23:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I wasn't sure if you had seen this note. This nomination is all set to be approved except for one minor nit-pick. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 16:00, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Timeline of troodontid research[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:31, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Timeline of oviraptorosaur research[edit]

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:07, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your DYK nomination[edit]

Hello! I don't know if you missed the notification above, but your DYK nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Timeline of ichthyosaur research needs attention to a minor issue before it can be given final approval. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 16:42, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Abyssal/Archive_17&oldid=1089936735"