Jump to content

User talk:Aecis/Messages 457-468

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User talk:Aecis
Archived messages
Messages 1-12 • Messages 13-24 • Messages 25-36 • Messages 37-48 • Messages 49-60 • Messages 61-72 • Messages 73-84 • Messages 85-96 • Messages 97-108 • Messages 109-120 • Messages 121-132 • Messages 133-144 • Messages 145-156 • Messages 157-168 • Messages 169-180 • Messages 181-192 • Messages 193-204 • Messages 205-216 • Messages 217-228 • Messages 229-240 • Messages 241-252 • Messages 253-264 • Messages 265-276 • Messages 277-288 • Messages 289-300 • Messages 301-312 • Messages 313-324 • Messages 325-336 • Messages 337-348 • Messages 349-360 • Messages 361-372 • Messages 373-384 • Messages 385-396 • Messages 397-408 • Messages 409-420 • Messages 421-432 • Messages 433-444 • Messages 445-456 • Messages 457-468 • Messages 469-480 • Messages 481-492 • Messages 493-504 • Messages 505-516
Archived Wikipedia Signposts
Signposts 1-12 • Signposts 13-24 • Signposts 25-36 • Signposts 37-48 • Signposts 49-60 • Signposts 61-72 • Signposts 73-84 • Signposts 85-96 • Signposts 97-108
Archived newsletters
Alternative music: 1-12 • 13-24
Formula One: 1-12 •
Military history: 1-12 • 13-24

Vielen Dank

[edit]

Thanks for fixing my tildes! I just had a look at how you did it a found the button! I learn something new on wiki everyday! Vielen Dank! --Camaeron (t/c) 16:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, User:Mahmoud123 is a confirmed sockpuppet. Cheers,

--Be happy!! (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Croats of Bosnia

[edit]

Hi. Just wondering if you're still planning to carry out the merges discussed atTalk:Croats_of_Bosnia_and_Herzegovina#Merge_proposal? I'd support you if you did and the various articles are in quite a sorry state at the moment. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Elfits FOR GREAT JUSTICE (klat) 10:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userified

[edit]

Now that all our fun is supposed to be over, User:Aecis/Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Blocking policy is the new home for what was formerly Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Blocking policyScientizzle 03:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My proposal

[edit]

Hi Aecis,

Hope you are doing well. Could you please take a look at my proposal here [1]. Thanks in advance, Cheers, --Be happy!! (talk) 09:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wim Rutte

[edit]

19:53, 8 April 2008 Aecis (Talk | contribs) (68,019 bytes) (Please provide a source for Wim Rutte; the only source I could find is this article) (undo)

Welk artikel vond je dan?

En de reden dat ik Wim Rutte heb toegevoegd, is omdat ik hem persoonlijk ken. Hij is namelijk mijn opa. De lijst zal waarschijnlijk nooit compleet zijn, omdat niet elke ex-voetballer op wikipedia te vinden is of elders op internet. En betreft al die andere namen, waar komen die dan vandaan? Bij de meeste namen is er ook niks over te vinden. FuturesEnglish 16:21, 9 April 2008

Why did you do that?

[edit]

The reason why I deleted my section is because it was pointless, you were sticking to your point and refusing to come to a shared-belief / solution. I discuss matters that there is a point which 2 people are distanced from, both have different point of view of the problem/solution but by engaging in words both parties realise a common solution and use or agree to a new point of view. Considering how no one understood the fact that "it's accepted in English" is based on the fact that the english language has been bombarded with Serbian POV long before Albanian POV and thus Serbian names and history has become "common" is not factual. I wanted it all gone since my arguments weren't bringing you any closer to seeing my point of view.

I don't understand what the fuss is all about. If Kosova is a disputed [anything] than BOTH sides need to be presented. The WP article is 100% pro-Serb; names, location, map, history. Again, I ask, "is Kosova Serbian?" The answer is no. Why isn't the region called Dardania since that is its' Albanian name ---- or the local native name, its' vernacular name? Kosova2008 (talk) 03:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Old AfDs should be left for the bot to remove, as it archives them also. Ty 17:19, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Whose permission do I need to start an article for Republic of Kosova? We need an article for Rep of Kosova because if you go to Hashim Thaçi page it talks about how he is the PM of Kosovo which leads to a disputed region. The tag should lead to his government in Rep of Kosova not the region of Kosova. Kosova2008 (talk) 21:19, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I clicked the Russian link you gave me, the first 2 huge paragraphs deal with the country than you get into history. This is not the case with Kosova. It is alllll about history, and some mentions of a DOI. It should be RoK than history. Kosova2008 (talk) 21:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's why I was asking whose permission i need. I want to speak to a higher authority (higher than admin) because the current users or admins are very anti-progress, or they wish to see progress by their definition. What I'm proposing is really important. Kosova2008 (talk) 04:23, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Salah

[edit]

Do not remove, Verified wikify at

Reading External Links
  • [2] The Realities of our Daily Prayers
  • [3] Salat of Quran
  • [4] Salat Timings of Quran
  • [5] Salat Asr
See also in Urdu
  • [6] Balagh Ul Quran
  • [7] Aslwat in the Light of Quran

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.128.22.126 (talkcontribs)

WP:HD

[edit]

Regarding your edit - why remove the whole section? That will surely make them wonder how it disappeared. Why not just delete the specific personal info? Even if the whole section didn't make sense. -- 213.152.52.38 (talk) 17:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]