User talk:Afactfinder
Welcome!
[edit]
|
NPOV
[edit]Please do not add your personal opinion or commentary to articles such as you have done in this edit. To comply with Wikipedia policy please ensure that information added to articles is reliably sourced and is written in a neutral tone. Thank you, --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 19:09, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Port Alberni, British Columbia. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 19:16, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Port Alberni, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 19:21, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Port Alberni, British Columbia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 19:25, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Your editing privileges have been suspended for 31 hours
[edit]{{unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Per WP:DISRUPT; WP is not your soapbox, and you need to provide reliable third party sources for content when it is likely contentious. Simply, if you cannot find a good reference then it does not go in. If you persist in including unsourced information, and especially if it is controversial, you will find yourself blocked, as you are now, from editing. Continued disruptive editing will result in an indefinite block. LessHeard vanU (talk) 19:53, 27 July 2010 (UTC)