User talk:Afthab Rahman LVM

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Mdaniels5757. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to P. Jayarajan seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:15, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Madhura Raja, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.

Also note that the content you added was unacceptably promotional. bonadea contributions talk 04:42, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Madhura Raja.

Also note that the content you added was unacceptably promotional. bonadea contributions talk 15:03, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My rebutal[edit]

Makers of the film Madhura Raja have confirmed that the film has collected more than Rs 100 crore worldwide. Then how can you say that i am simply changing the contents without proof? Please take a look on the following newspaper article about the box office collection report , they are among the best and most popular newspapers of India. [1][2][3] Afthab Rahman LVM (talk) 17:56, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

September 2019[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Madhura Raja shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. bonadea contributions talk 18:28, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 5[edit]

Please believe me, i am not engaged in an edit war. You can check the content i edited and can review the proofs i presented. That film collected above 100 crores and i quoted that from a trustable source, instead of 42 crore Afthab Rahman LVM (talk) 00:52, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Madhura Raja; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

If you think you are not edit warring, you have clearly not read the information provided above. Please do so. And use the article talk page to discuss your proposed changes. There is an edit note saying that the producers' claims should not be used without any secondary source. To change that you have to discuss and reach a new consensus first. bonadea contributions talk 09:34, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In case you don't know where the talk page is (given that you have never posted to an article talk page, only added and re-added poorly sourced and promotional text to the article), it is at Talk:Madhura Raja. --bonadea contributions talk 09:45, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mysore sultanate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/history-of-mysore-state-1442911545-1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:52, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Mysore sultanate has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

to Mr mirror cracker,[edit]

Actually what's your problem? creating and expanding page is a crime? Afthab Rahman LVM (talk) 02:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have copied the text you added from [1]. You absolutely must not copy text from other web site into Wikipedia articles. Every time you edit, there is a message that says: "Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone—subject to certain terms and conditions." It could hardly be clearer than that. Do not under any circumstances copy text from the web into Wikipedia articles. If you continue to put the project at risk this way, you will be blocked from editing. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 03:02, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mysore Sultanate moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Mysore Sultanate, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:30, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mysore Sultanate[edit]

Information icon Hello, Afthab Rahman LVM. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mysore Sultanate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]