User talk:Agenda21culture

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; you are welcome to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 09:52, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agenda21culture (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedian. I have added some information on Agenda 21 for culture. As a researcher on this issue, I think it is really important to explain the work they are doing when explaining that culture goes well beyond their "classical limits". A lot of researchers are working hard on relating culture with sustainable development, cultural diversity and so on. Their voice has to be heard. Please unblock my username. I have been working hard on the texts to be publish and they follow Wikipedia standards. Thanks in advance.

Decline reason:

This userid cannot be blocked as per the username policy and WP:COI as noted below. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:12, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't think you have read the reason behind your block! Do you understand conflict of interest? You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product, contrary to the username policy. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:17, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agenda21culture (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just wanted to let you know that I chose that username to make my contributions on that because it was easier for me. In that way I could have them separate of other contributions I am doing. However, following your instructions I will change my username if this is a problem.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline: close to 3 days of waiting for a response re:WP:Alternate account (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:23, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

By "I could have them separate of other contributions I am doing" do you mean that you also use another account to edit? If so you will need to disclose what account that is before an unblock can be considered. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:33, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to imply that you want a username for each topic area you plan on editing, which isn't exactly the best way to go about it. The easiest way to keep track of the different articles you edit is to add them to your watchlist - see Help:Watching pages. The lazier path (and the one I prefer) might be to just check your contributions - this lists every edit you've made, and the most recent articles you've worked on will appear at the top. Having multiple IDs, even if you disclose them, can give the impression that you are multiple people, which can cause confusion. Best to keep the one ID. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 12:09, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer the question above about using other accounts. Even if your intentions are perfectly above board, unfortunately using multiple accounts can, as Ultraexactzz said, cause confusion, and if we don't know what other accounts you are using then we can never be sure that you are not using them in ways that cause misunderstandings due to other people thinking that different people are involved. It is very unlikely that this account will be unblocked as long as that doubt is not resolved. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:33, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]