The General review is intended to encourage and identify competent content with a minimum of bureaucracy. It has no subsidiary pages outside of template space. If an editor feels that they have updated a page to the point that a general reader would be reasonably satisfied with the coverage, they may nominate in one of the categories below. The article should not neglect major aspects of a topic, have sound prose, and cite its sources. Nominations need only a blue link and a summary sentence.
Any editor may choose an article from the list: remove it from this page, start an article talk thread, and leave a user talk note with the nominator. Reviewers are encouraged to edit the article directly if they see room for improvement. Once the reviewer and nominator are both confident that the coverage is competent, the successful General review template may be placed at the top of article talk. The template should be linked to the thread where the review took place.
Where an editor finds a page that has passed General review but feels the coverage dissatisfying, he or she may reiniate the process: start a thread, leave a user talk note, and attempt to improve the content. If this fails, the template may be removed.
Currently there #### that have passed General review. There is no canonical list. Ideally, every article on Wikipedia will one day be able to pass General review.
Why do you feel like a list of press coverage for the particular topic is tantamount to it being written as an advertisment? Is it because the title for that list of links is "press coverage" as oppposed to "external links"? If so, I will make that change. There are plenty of other precedents in Wikipedia for listing press mentions of a topic as a series of links, e.g. Woot, Drudge Report so the mere existence of these links in article shouldn't be a problem. -- Gnocchiandwine (talk) 17:32, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I felt the article reads likes an advertisement and according to our external links property a link farm of such a nature would not be appropriate. Feel free to look at our WP:ADVERT policy for more information. I would also caution that your edits seem to imply a possible close association with the subject matter. If you are connected, either professionally or personally with the project you may want make recommendation on the article's talk page or on the Wine Project talk page to avoid any possible conflict of interest. AgneCheese/Wine19:46, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your comment is interesting, because surely the point of having the correct name ("Bank of Sweden Prize...) is that it doesn't elevate that status of the economics prizes to the level of the other real Nobel prizes?? Haven't you got it backwards? Please reconsider. Wikidea10:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, I don't think the average reader cares that much about semantics and wordplay. The prestige and notability of the award is not really affected whether or not it is sponsored by the Bank of Sweden or sponsored by the Nobel Foundation. It's commonly known as the Nobel Prize in Economics. It's given at the same ceremony. The rest is just periphery. My belief is that it would be a disservice to the reader to have the article at the uncommonly known and awkwardly titled Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel and I don't think I'm alone in thinking that I'm at the wrong article if I came upon that page when I'm looking for the Nobel Prize in Economics. AgneCheese/Wine11:20, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nobel famously detested economists. This is why he did not endow this prize. It is a blatant posthumous hacking of his intentions on the part of the bankers in Sweden. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.231.241.76 (talk) 01:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of History of American wine, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://aguidetowine.com/aguidetowine-learnaboutwinefromamerica.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot06:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, that is quick. Like less then a minute. :) I was creating a split from the main American wine out of the humongous history section there. I'm not aware of a copyright vio and do not know who the original author is but will look into the information. AgneCheese/Wine06:50, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I can only assume that your removal of my citation in Kistler Vineyards was either an oversight in fact checking or perhaps since it's on one of the last pages of the book after the index, maybe not included in all printings. I've restored the citation and included a URL. (no biggy) But more to the point, I too am a stickler for citing sources and I actually appreciate your verification. However, I find it's often a better idea to tag a citation with either {{Failed verification}} or {{request quote}} for at least few days to give the editor the benefit of the doubt if it seems like they're an earnest contributor. Courtesy and inclusion goes a long way on WP. Cheers! Toddstreat112:49, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize if that came across as discourteous. Considering the fluid nature of the wiki, I tend to take Jimbo's words of just remove it rather then tag and wait to heart. It's better to have no information then to potentially have incorrect information. If I was mistaken, it's an easy fix. Though after reading the "Do yourself tasting guide" section that you posted online (and admittedly its not in either of my two copies of Tabers book), I have to admit I still have doubts as to the strength of that reference. The "leading Chardonnay" is quite vague and Kistler is mentioned almost in passing with no collaborating statements to back up the claim that they are a "leading producer of chardonnay" (Sales, production volume, range of distribution, history? etc). It just seems like an unsubstantiated personal opinion and just a token mention at that. AgneCheese/Wine22:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Good work on getting all the names of the AVA's switched to (Name) AVA format. Now we just need to create pages for those that don't already exist. In addition to the Virgnia wine article, I'm going to try to work on the East Coast AVA's that still need articles. VirginiaProp22:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The LGBT studies project has been rather quiet of late. Though we've added over 180 new members in the last year, only a small percentage are active participants. If you haven't visited our project or talk page in a while, please stop by for a look. Also, if you happen to bump into another editor who you feel might enjoy working with us, please extend an invitation. There's lot's do do, and the active members would sincerely appreciate some help.
Our Peer review project is struggling at the present, with only a few people reviewing the articles. While it is certainly possible to submit articles for a general peer review, a review by members of the LGBT community can be of additional value for LGBT specific writing. There are several articles currently up for review on a wide range of topics. At the very least, reading the articles will undoubtedly broaden your intellectual horizons :-)
At the moment, David Le Brocq, Malmö Devilants and Trajectory Hermeneutics are up for deletion review. Please take a look at them and make your voice heard at the deletion review. Articles nominated for deletion also present a challenge for improvement. See what you can do, and watchlist our deletion review page.
The Pederasty articles continue to be a point of controversy both within and outside of our community. Various editors have suggested that to include them as LGBT Project related somehow taints the project and brings Wikipedia into disrepute. Other editors have stated that the articles, and especially the Pederasty article, are part of the core of LGBT studies. Well meaning editors continue to remove our tags from the articles themselves as well as the talk pages. If you have time, please read the articles and watchlist them to protect them from vandalism and well meaning but counterproductive edits.
The list of LGBT people has survived its 4th nomination for deletion. Please watchlist this list to protect it from vandalism and unsourced additions. There are many in Wikipedia who would like to see this Featured status list removed from the project. It is up to us to keep it to such a high caliber that it never is removed.
Our project member David Shankbone is now working as a journalist for Wikinews, as well as continuing to improve our project and Wikipedia as a whole with his photographs. A sincere thank you goes out to him for all of his hard work. Wikipedia would not shine nearly as brightly without your contributions, David.
Happy Halloween, everybody! Be happy and celebrate!
The surviving life partner of prominent LGBT rights activist Barbara Gittings recently called one of our editors and, among other things, complimented us on what a great job our project is doing on Wikipedia. Thanks to everyone who contributes to this project, either through their article edits or support for other project members. We really are making an difference here!
Member assistance
Some of our project members have been having difficulties related to editing on the encyclopedia. If you are feeling frustrated or distressed by your editing experience, please don't keep it to yourself. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, and we are all here to help one another. Drop a line on our talkpage or on another editor's page, and other members of the LGBT project will happily give you the support you want and need.
Lastly, Halloween is just around the corner. More than most holidays, Halloween is a holiday embraced by and tailor made to our community (though God only knows why we are invisible in the Halloween article here. Perhaps somebody would like to rectify that editing oversight). Have fun, everybody, and remember to both trick and treat!
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please let us know here. If you have any news or any announcements to be broadcast, do let Dev920 know.
Well I've moved it there - I don't think original research is a concern, as we're not putting this forward as a colloquialism, rather than as a description of the class. Cheers! bd2412T03:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On November 8, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Harvest (wine), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
I am unclear on your position. It seems you are saying removing citations in favor of a ref section is bad, but then with respect to the article you are saying it is not necessarily well cited. However, this is not clear. In short, it sound like you may be on my side, but I can't really tell.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not on yours or anyone else's side. I strongly favor the use of inline citations but my honest opinion was that as a GA reviewer I wouldn't have passed the Gilbert Perreault article that you original did without some improvement to the citation structure of the article. (I certainly wouldn't pass the current version). I tried to give some example to explain that you don't need multiple citations for the same claim but you do need to make sure that more opinion oriented claims (like the two I picked out) are cited. This meant that in order for the article to be "well cited" some redundant cites would need to be removed but some relevant cites would be added. AgneCheese/Wine02:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've stopped by the Portal:Wine a few times and noticed it hasn't been updated since I believe April. I've been updating the Portal:Food for the last six+ months along with the other stuff for the WikiProject Food and Drink and was going to start updating the Portal:Wine but wanted to see if you are anyone else on the WikiProject Wine had plans.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC22:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On 9 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Barbaresco, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Cool. If you haven't already, drop a note on the Wine Project to hopefully solicit more input. Admittedly I won't be too active with this template in the early going since I have a couple articles like Piemonte (wine) that I'm still working heavily on. AgneCheese/Wine20:01, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On 11 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aglianico, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Hey, Peeps, it's that time of the month again (no not that time — get your mind out of the gutter): time for another monthly edition of the LGBT Project'sLove Boat newsletter from your cruise directorMiss Julie. So much has been happening this month and I just can't wait to tell you all about it!!!
Let's start with some good news: Alice and the project lost the bothersome sock puppet who had been disrupting many articles we monitor, and now most of us can edit in relative peace. Congratulations, Alice, for being able to come out of semi-retirement. Benjiboi, on the other hand, has gained an anonymous IP stalker who seems to be more Catholic than the Pope and who has a hard-on for the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence. We seem to have a sort of Yin and Yang thing going on here, which helps both to keep us in balance and on our toes <bright smiles all around>.
Albus Dumbledore got outed this month, and was immediately adopted by our project. The international brouhaha surrounding this disclosure reached all the way to Wikiland, and his article was briefly locked due to homophobic vandalism (as well as well meaning editors who just couldn't believe that that nice man could possibly be gay). This is a wonderful article to add to your watchlist, and will surely give you hours of reverting fun on cold winter days.
On a more serious note, Fireplace has suggested a new article series about LGBT rights in the United States, state by state. This ambitious topic will surely require many editors and a lot of research, but has the potential to add further prestige to our already prestigious project.
Francis Bacon (not the new gay one, but the old gay one ... though they're actually both dead, now that I think about it) has also aroused passions here on Wikipedia, with editors opposing his sexuality being disclosed in his biography. The always helpful Haiduc has thoughtfully provided any number of sources, but it is slow going getting his point across. Anyone want to lend a hand?
And speaking of passions, Jack Kerouac has inflamed the senses once again with editors, including administrator Irishguy, mounting a spirited defense to keep him as heterosexual as possible for Wikipedia purposes. Why? I don't know. Perhaps some of you can drop by the talk page and ask your questions there. I feel certain a stimulating debate will ensue that will be enjoyed by all.
Did you know that one of our Featured articles, Lawrence v. Texas, lost its shiny gold star? That was a shocker. It has been suggested that we turn our attention to it in an effort to restore it to its former glory. I took a peek, and it does need our help badly. For our American editors, it would seem almost a civic duty to edit it (not that I'm hinting....).
Though it was far too intellectual a debate for a mere cruise director like myself to take part in, Intersexuality was certainly a hot topic a week or two ago. The thrust of the debate was over inclusion in our project. Lots of good editors had lots of good opinions. For those too lazy to check out the discussion, we decided to leave it out for now.
Peer review is, as always, short staffed and seemingly unloved. Wouldn't you feel better about yourself and the world in general if you took a few minutes to read one of the listed articles and offer some helpful advice? I know I'd feel better if you did.
The article LGBT movements in the United States certainly raised eyebrows last week, especially when it was discovered that copyrighted content had been added to our article. Tragedy was averted at the last minute, though, when the original hosts of the article where the material had been pilfered agreed to make it free to everyone. Our thanks to them, whoever they are. Busy Bee that I am, I haven't had time to read it, but I'm sure it's sensational.
Not content to run for Best Actress, plucky Bannon won a Best supporting actress Oscar... whoops, I meant to say Ann is also getting more than her share of womanly attention on the Good Article list. Joining her on this exalted plane are Freddy Mercury, Waylon Smithers and Lance Bass. Good articles indeed, and the last one mentioned just goes to show that one needn't admire the subject of an article to appreciate the effort put into making him worthwhile reading. What on earth Britney ever saw in him I'll never know. Truly a riddle cloaked in an enigma and wrapped around a puzzle.
On a personal note, your already overworked cruise director is being cyberly whipped almost daily by Nemissimo, who desperately wants to get the German BDSM translation copy edited and used as a replacement for the current one. It's such a ... err, stimulating topic that I am sure many of you will want to join the copy editing fun. Jump right in, folks! It's so lonely copy editing it all by my lonesome!
A little birdie just whispered in my ear that our noble collaboration project was delisted from the Community Portal due to inactivity. When asked how this scandalous turn of events could have occurred, the answer I received was "we suck at stuff like that". Well. In the first place, I disagree that sucking should be considered a negative, but to each his or her own. In the second place, I have full confidence that we can and will collaborate with other projects in the future. So let's not view this as a setback (even though it is), but rather a challenge to improve (and good Lord, I sound almost Wikipedian!).
Lastly, the holidays are rapidly approaching. Our American cousins are currently getting ready to slaughter masses of poultry in an effort to show their gratitude and generally peaceful demeanor, and those of the Canadian persuasion, trendsetters that they are, celebrated a bit early this year. I'm sure all us foreigners will join together in wishing them all a very happy Thanksgiving on their respective holidays, both already celebrated and forthcoming... though I would hope somebody would enlighten me as to why they don't celebrate it on the same day. I was awake all last night trying to figure that one out.
In the spirit of this peculiarly North American holiday, let me take a moment to thank all of our editors for their contributions to this project. It's people like you who make people like me...well, a "people person"! May all your Wiki days be bright, and may your Love Boat never turn into a Poseidon.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please let us know here. If you have any news or any announcements to be broadcast, do let Dev920 know.
On November 13, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Piedmont wine, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Thanks for the compliment but I've got more articles to write that I would fret that adminship would distract me from. But thanks again for the thought. AgneCheese/Wine15:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. It is a good article (Much like your other work on Carménère) and I thought the criticism missed the marked. It was an honest assessment of the article from an (admittedly) non-soap fan. AgneCheese/Wine21:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Did you know? was updated. On 19 November, 2007, a fact from the article Tannat, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
On November 19, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Galician wine, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Hi Agne, I see you're working hard on Spanish wines :) Glad to see that someone else cares!!! :) Apart from me and Mickaud no-one else seems to have contributed and we have both been kind of inactive lately. In my case, I'm really busy with Other Things at the moment (including my wine project!) so I cant do much. --BodegasAmbite (talk) 09:36, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks but you two really laid the ground work with the individual DO articles. I'm just doing some of the broader scale work. But thanks again for the kind words. AgneCheese/Wine09:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In appreciation of your patient advocacy on my behalf, even though we haven't interacted very much. I'm touched by your kindness. Best regards, DurovaCharge!17:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well thank you. I consider myself just a simple editor and I was moved to speak after seeing one of the project's best admin get railroaded for a very simple and human mistake. It is easy to see a lot more damaging admin abuses out there and it good to see that even Jimbo can recognize the silliness that has erupted. You've conducted yourself with the utmost integrity and class and I think I represent a fair share of the "average editors" out there whose only interaction with you is to see the quality work that you do. AgneCheese/Wine21:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On 23 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Catalan wine, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
On 24 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jura wine, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Thanks for your great post on the Contest talk page. We would love to have you on Veropedia as well, to keep the wine articles stable and in good shape. If you are interested, please let me know. Danny (talk) 03:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
hmm, that might be something to consider. I've got a couple other non-wiki projects that will take up some of my time for this next week and a half but after that I would probably be interested. AgneCheese/Wine03:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that you made an edit to what I had posted. Kansas and Mizzou BOTH are tied in the Big 12 North at 7-1, albeit, Mizzou, wins the Tie-Breaker and will represent the Big 12 North in the title game, that also means that Kansas is the C0-Champion of the Big 12 North and will receive a flag nxet year saying as such. Just like Georgia and Tenn. both are tied at 6-2 in the SEC East and are Co-Champions of the East, but Tenn won the tie breaker. Georgia will still be labeled as the SEC East Co-Champion. Dawg1279 (talk) 06:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I figured I would get belittled for that one, I thought it was funny. ;) Barnstars only suck in the sense that they are completely intangible. I give 'em out, because it's nice to know someone is thinking of or appreciates you. It's the time it takes, not the actual award itself though, which a message accomplishes the same thing, of course. :) Thanks again.IvoShandor (talk) 16:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Agne, nice to see that you've improved significantly on the Mosel article. I suppose it was to celebrate what I've heard is a quite good vintage, which we need after the relatively horrible 2006. I made a few minor corrections to the text, and I thought I should point out that German vineyard names are usually written unhyphenated. Brauneberger Juffer-Sonnenuhr is one of few exceptions. The article also stated that Müller-Thurgau from Mosel goes into Liebfraumlich, which can't be fullt correct since Liebfraumlich can't come from Mosel (only from Rheingau, Nahe, Rheinhessen or Pfalz). I changed that to "Liebfraumilch-style" wine as an easy workaround. To be quite honest, I don't know where M-T ends up or if the present statement is really correct. I don't think I've ever seen a real life bottle of Moseltaler (the Liebfraumilch-look-a-like from Mosel), but I have seen Rivaner (dry M-T) from Mosel, and I think cold-grown M-T works OK in Sekt, especially if blended with Elbling which has very high acidity. I suppose I have to try to check it up some time. BTW, keep up the good work! Tomas e (talk) 22:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the corrections. You are quite right, it was a Liebraumilch style wine that I was trying to refer to but obviously missed in clarifying that. I probably should drink a little less of my subject matter when working on articles. :P AgneCheese/Wine20:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On 29 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mosel wine, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Hey Agne, I finally got round to it, or something like it, by way of another shot I was doing. They're reds of course, rather than the whites you suggested, but I guess it's all the same. I didn't notice anything directly relating to colour changes in the text, hence the long caption. If you'd rather add all that sort of thing to the text (including why the colour changes..) be my guest :) --mikaultalk22:31, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On 30 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lesbian wine, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
On 2 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Toscana (wine), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Thank you for nominating this article. I went out of town before I could nominate it prior to the 5 day mark. I appreciate you finding a good hook from it. AgneCheese/Wine18:13, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Quelle Suprise! King James is a Queen!
Our dear Haiduc, never a stranger to controversy, recently decided to delve into the wardrobe of the British Monarchy, and what did he discover? King James had more than appreciative eyes for strapping young men! Naturally, Haiduc felt the need to share this news with the community, but instead of being praised for his scholarship, he was reviled. In fact, one rabid heterocentrist even rummaged around in his own wardrobe until he found an old pair of socks to play with. All seemed lost until astute editor Jeffpw noticed some odd postings and did some sleuthing of his own. The socks were uncovered, the Wicked Witch was melted and readers the world over were able to learn that Good King James regularly ordered tube steak from the menu of the day. Thank you, Haiduc! Thank you, Jeff! And let Miss Julie add (for readers who might not know) that tube steak tastes just like chicken!
It's Britney, Bitch!
Well, maybe it's not Miss Thang, herself, but it's the next best thing: Chris Crocker! he stirs up just about as much controversy as his idol does, even here on Wikipedia. Though it's all a bit of a muddle, one of our editors hopes you can drop by the talk page and leave a message of hope for those battling the forces of obstructionism in that little corner of the Wiki World. It is so hard to spread enlightenment. As Miss Parker herself said, "You can lead a whore to culture, but you can't make her think".
Game show for nerds
Wallowing in cash from the latest beg-a-thon, the powers-that-be have decided to sponser a little contest here to improve the articles, with a Grand prize of $100. Yeah. Just enough for a Burger King dinner for the family. Still, the thought is nice and the goal is noble, so we should support it. Our little Queer beehive has taken a look at what's on offer, and both the Greek Traditionalists and Daughters of Bilitis are well represented. The ever useful SatyrTN has made a little list, which can be found here (if that malignant bot hasn't archived it already, that is). So find a pal, roll up your sleeves and dive right in. Let's show this Encyclopedia just what Queers with firecrackers up their....err, I mean, let's show the others what we can do.
Jón Þór Birgisson
I can't pronounce his name, but he's awfully cute, he's deliciously foreign, and best of all...he's GAY! But he won't be for long, if certain users have their way. A concerted effort has been under way for a while now, designed to neuter poor Jon (pretend I put a little accent thingy over that O) and make him into a sort of rockin' Ken doll. So please watchlist this hunka man, and keep him queer! If anybody questions you, tell them "Miss Julie sent me".
TranSanta
Everybody loves a sequel
Readers not afflicted with Alzheimer's will remember that last month we had a little story about Alice and her harasser. That proved so popular that we bring you the sequel: Benjiboi and his stalker. After a chance meeting at the Michael Lucas article, this anonymous user took a shine to our Benjiboi, and has been showering him with attention on virtually every board on Wikipedia. Flattered though he is, Benjiboi finds the attention a bit distracting, and administrators have been seeking various remedies for this. It has proven difficult, as the stalker has an IP address that changes quicker than Superman in a telephone booth. So perhaps some of you would like to watchlist Benjiboi's page, and lend a hand if you see some love letters from an 11 digit friend. I was actually thinking we should get Alice's harasser and Benjiboi's stalker together. Then we could have another sequel, sort of like Freddy vs. Jason. Any bets as to who would win??
Not quite the second coming, but special just the same
Let me be the first to give a warm, wet, Love Boat kiss (though not with tongue) to our newest Project members: Jacksinterweb, Cleduc, Pigman, Becksguy and Iamandrewrice. Even in the month of our Saviour's birth, your popping into our Wikipedian lives is a blessed event indeed. As Jesus Himself said, "Live long and prosper". He did say that, didn't he? I think he said it. In any event, if he was standing next to me now, I'm sure he'd say it, and add, "Happy homo editing!"
Battle of the Wikipedia Stars!
Indomitable Ann Bannon is holding her own in Wikipedia's answer to American Idol: The Featured Article candidate list! For four feverish weeks, she has mastered the challenges and not been eliminated from the competition. Drop by the FAC page and show Ann you love her....or give her the hook (I'm not supposed to tell you how to vote). Giving our plucky Ann reason to hope is the recent promotion of List of gay, lesbian or bisexual people: Sa-Sc. If Miss Julie has her way, we will have the entire alphabet of Queerdom Featured here on Wikipedia soon! And I would be remiss if I did not give a warm, Lesbian salute to our own Belovedfreak, who showed Wikipedia with But I'm a Cheerleader that even pom poms are no protection from the Love that dare not speak its name, and got a gold star for her efforts.
Climbing the Wikipedia career ladder is User: Tim1965, who has not only written, but is now promoting Reel Affirmations to Good article status. Best of luck, Tim, and remember: there are no small parts, only small actors. We're sure you'll be trading that green circle for a gold star soon (assuming you get the green in the first place!).
Santa's on his gay way!
Santa needs elves
Yes, I know: packages need buying, trees need trimming, egg nog needs drinking. The holidays make many demands on our time. It's ...well, it's a bitch, is what it is. So I wouldn't blame you for skipping this little section and putting off my request until next year. But...think of the children. Our future. They need quality information about the homosexual "lifestyle" if we are to indoctrinate them properly. That's why I am asking you to drop by our Peer review area and give your meaning as to the efforts of your fellow gay Wikipedians. And think: in this season of kindness and good will to all, isn't it nice that I am pointing you to someplace where you can (in a Wikiloving way, of course) rip someone a new asshole? Think about it...and those children with their shiny, bright eyes, thanking you for contributing to their future.
Even more festively, consider joining in on the deletion discussions of our favorite articles. Here you can bandy about such words as "homophobia", "Right-wing Christian agenda" and my personal favorite, "just who do you think you're pushing around?!?!?". If you play your cards right, there might even be an extra present under the tree for you. :-D
Urgent Christmas appeal Tovojolo asked me to ask you to edit Elizabeth Bishop as part of the Collaboration Project. She's an old dead poet (Miss Bishop, not Tovojolo. I've never actually met Tovojolo. She's probably very young and attractive. Maybe somebody should ask if she's single), but she was a flaming homosexual long before most of us had even been conceived, so we owe her some respect. Tovojolo actually asked me for the last newsletter, but Miss Julie forgot. Bad Miss Julie. She was so busy boosting morale it just slipped right by her. Nemissimo, maybe you need to crack that whip again to get Julie back in line.
Surrender, Dorothy!!!!!!! Friend of Dorothy has attracted the attention of a group of....the more senior elements of our gay society. They disagree with our thesis that Saint Judy was the possible source of the term, and demand we change the article to reflect their contention that Dorothy Parker was the origin. The problem is, their source didn't check out. So we agreed to disagree. Well, we at the project did. They got kinda mad at us, said unkind things, and started edit warring. Though they are old, they are certainly quick, and could revert the article faster than my nimble fingers could press the undo button. To quote the divine Miss Parker, every time I saw the article on my watchlist, I thought to myself, "What fresh hell is this?". The page was protected by sympathetic administrators, but keeping an eye on it will keep Dorothy safe from future Wicked Witches of the West or East.
Ambrosia
Our dear Benjiboi has been busy indeed, lately. He recently made fruit salad out of Fruit, turning a once nasty word into a damn good article, and saving it from deletion! Congratulations, Benjiboi! I hear he has turned his attention from fruit to poultry now. Before he is through, he will have turned every major food group gay on Wikipedia!
Christmas came early
Yes, indeed! Valued administrator WJBscribe was raised out of the mire of mid-level management and placed squarely into the Pantheon of Bureaucracy! And Miss Julie is just too proud of him not to mention that he got the most support votes in the history of Wikipedia! Congratulations, WJB! We know you will not prove the Peter Principle correct!
You!
Yes, you! It's you who make this project shine! It's you who make Wikipedia such a valuable resource for all humanity! And it's you who make Miss Julie's dull life just a little bit better. So I want to take this moment to thank each and every one of you for all you do here. Merry Christmas, everybody! Happy Hanukkah! Festive Kwanzaa!Delirious Dong Zhi!Delicious Diwali! And for our oppressed Iranian brothers and sisters, I wish you a safe and joyous Yalda. And if I didn't mention your favorite December holiday, well, it's because I feel it's so special I should just keep it between you and me. Always remember: You light up my life!
May we all have a joyous holiday season, and a safe, healthy, happy and prosperous 2008.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please let us know here. If you have any news or any announcements to be broadcast, do let Your Cruise Director know.
I'm working on cleaning up old Oregon-related merge proposals and was wondering if there's any reason we shouldn't go ahead and merge the other two articles into this one? Katr67 (talk) 23:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Back in black...or rather wine stain burgundy Yes, the newsletter is back and we catch up with the some of the great work being done by Wine Project members like Kharker, VirginiaProp, BodegasAmbite and more!
Updates on Operation Stubkiller, GAs, and DYKs As well as advice and links for finding photos and illustrations for our wine articles
This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. If you have any Wikipedia wine related news, announcements or suggestions drop a note in the Comments/Suggestion area of Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine/Newsletter.
Congratulations! Here's a medal for you in appreciation of your hardwork in creating, expanding and nominating 25+ articles for DYK. Numbers are not important, but 25 is impressive. Have a bottle of wine. Keep up the good work, Agne27! --Victuallers (talk) 20:46, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On 12 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pais, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
On 13 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Vietnamese wine, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
By the way, there are still a lot to write about various countries producing wine: Turkey, South Korea, India, etc... only if we can find reliable sources. --BorgQueen (talk) 13:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah! It's exciting that there is a literally a world of wine out there but daunting at the same time. I've got access to a few good sources so I'll see what I can do. I'm currently researching Algerian wine. AgneCheese/Wine13:34, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you haven't seen these there's some promise. A NY Times article (adorably ancient voice from 89) which gets a RS nod, and what I belive to be a transcript from a L'Express article from 2005, in French mind you, and not through L'Express' official pages. As far as the NYT article, quite a few things have changed, long before Réserve du Général became Alter Ego, but the historical snapshot is nice. The sources oddly differ as NYT mentions that Mouton-Rothschild stands out by not having a second, while L'Express credits Mouton Cadet with giving impetus to the practice. As far as the pioneer, NYT points to a Brane-Cantenac deuxième some time in the 19th century "according to Decanter", while L'express claims there are records of Pichon-Lalande sending a second to the world's fair in Moscow 1874. Léoville Las-Cazes producing Clos du Marquis in 1904 they agree on.. MURGHdisc.00:28, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, that is interesting. Good find! If I get a chance tonight I'll try to start the article but you are always welcome to take the lead if you like. AgneCheese/Wine04:01, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A good, thorough start. I found a nice official pdf listing all the top cru seconds, I'll start applying soon. What I'm not sure where to insert, what I feel is initially missing, that many chateaux will make its second exclusively from its youngest wines, producing sort of a juvenile sampler. Where do you think that best fits? MURGHdisc.02:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]