User talk:Ahsanimtiaz53

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Ahsanimtiaz53, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

The Ring (2017 film)[edit]

Hi, I've reverted this edit because it didn't seem constructive to me. It's unclear why you're renaming portions of the article. Please open a discussion on the article's talk page to explain. I know that there were initial considerations of renaming the film, but at the time there were no confirmations. If you have evidence that there has been a confirmation, please bring it to the article's talk page. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:23, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Ring (2017 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Justeditingtoday (talk) 17:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ash'ari[edit]

Wikipedia works on ”verifiability, not truth” as a guiding principle. This policy states that “Wikipedia's content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. That we have rules for the inclusion of material does not mean Wikipedians have no respect for truth and accuracy, just as a court's reliance on rules of evidence does not mean the court does not respect truth. Wikipedia values accuracy, but it requires verifiability.” George Custer's Sabre (talk) 17:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please shut your mouth. You’re a “Muslim”, so you’re supposed to tell the truth. Otherwise, you will have to answer Allah on the day of judgement, and you will not have an excuse. Ahsanimtiaz53 (talk) 22:06, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You do not appear familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. In particular, Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. According to WP:VERIFY, "Any material that needs a source but does not have one July be removed." It also says: "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 05:42, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ash'ari, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:04, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:05, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]