User talk:Aikclaes

César Santin

Hi. Please see Talk:César Santín#Name. Thank you. ka la ha 17:44, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks.

The Emirates Stadium capacity is 60,355

Please stop changing the article to an incorrect figure - any further reversions of my edits and I'll be forced to block you. As for IPA, not only is it unnecessary for the English language Wikipedia, it is also incorrect - you have not provided the IPA for the word "Stadium". Qwghlm (talk) 13:54, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just for the record: I have never changed the figure for the stadium's capacity, so your threats are absurd. Aikclaes (talk) 10:40, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Norwich City F.C.

I'm puzzled by this. Either you intended to put it in the Norwich article, or you've missed off more than half of the pronunciation. --Dweller (talk) 15:04, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong info

Hi there CLAES, VASCO from Portugal here,

In Sebastián Eguren, you have made a mistake (we all do), saying that he moved to AIK permanently. Then, you wrote in storyline that he must return to VILLARREAL because he still has 12 months in his contract?! That is precisely why it is a LOAN, player must report to old club to decide his future.

I also improved article with a new reference, please do not remove the correct info, maybe we can all work together as a team. You told some user to look at the reference where the transfer to AIK is referred. Well, i know ZERO Swedish, so i don't know what the article says, but if it says it is a permanent transfer, it is WRONG, it's a loan.

Continue the good work, nice weekend,

VASCO - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 04:13, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very strange indeed, but then, what can surprise you in the world of modern football? If he has to return to Villarreal, how on earth it's not a loan? Oh well...I have total faith in your explanations, so you can update the player's page (in the AIK transfer paragraph) as you wish, i won't revert it.

Sorry for any incovenience, cheers,

VASCO - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 18:57, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work man. I only made some corrections to your last inputs.

1 - In an encyclopedia, we must write always in past tense, so i made some tense adjustments, without altering contents one bit.

2 - Eguren could be, i'll give you that, a CENTRAL MIDFIELDER - but i think he is a DEFENSIVE MIDFIELDER with a good scoring rate. What he is not, 100% sure, is a DEEP-FORWARD, ATTACKING MIDFIELDER or SECOND STRIKER, no way, i corrected that.

3 - I think the club's name should be compressed in box only, not storyline. Therefore, please leave AIK FOTBOLL in story, AIK in box.

Feel free to give me your views on that, cheers,

VASCO - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 21:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Response to response :)

1 - 100 % clear. UPDATE: Ah, i see what you mean, it's just that i see WP as an encyclopedia, even though it is a "special one". At least i ALWAYS write in past tense, but i don't own the truth.

2 - No, i disagree. I think the player's main position should be the one appearing in INTRO. In storyline, perhaps we could write "In his spell at AIK, he was used mainly as a X or a Y". What i can tell you is that at Villarreal he was a defensive unit, even playing as central defender.

3 - Just for a matter of display, really. I think the club's fullname - the fullname at WP, not the full name of the organization - should appear in story, just once (intro and once in body of article that is), just for matter of display and informative purposes.

Cheers, take care,

VASCO, Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 22:40, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did not remove anything man, i merely composed it. That piece in intro has got to go in three months 1/2 - when he returns to Villarreal - that is why i though it should only be in storyline, not in intro. Sorry for any incovenience.

Have a fine week, VASCO - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 17:10, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:27, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to ...Baby One More Time (song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 19:42, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to ...Baby One More Time (song), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered vandalism. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 18:20, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at ...Baby One More Time (song), you may be blocked from editing. -- WikHead (talk) 18:50, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Genres

First off, I do not write the templates, so if you have a problem with their wording, you'll have to take that up with the users who do. Secondly, no derogatory terms are being used... both genres listed have sourced articles. You may also wish to read WP:GWARRIOR, for a clearer description of what you're doing. -- WikHead (talk) 18:48, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Football taskforce proposal

I've created a proposal for a Sweden taskforce under Wikipedia:Football, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/WikiProject Football/Sweden task force and support and join if you are interested. --Reckless182 (talk) 19:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AIK Fotboll

Hi

Please do not add a wikilink for Alhassan Kamara. He is not notable since he fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL, he has not yet made any appearances in a professional league or played for a senior national team, therefore a wikilink for him shouldn't be added. If you have any questions, just write to me at my talk page. Thanks. --Reckless182 (talk) 20:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, he is quite notable due to being the focal point of a documentary film. Maybe if I include info about that on the page? Aikclaes (talk) 21:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He is only notable if he meets either WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTBALL. I'm sure he will play for AIK when Allsvenskan starts, why not just wait until then? --Reckless182 (talk) 21:34, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alhassan "Crespo" Kamara

The article Alhassan "Crespo" Kamara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG, footballer with no professional apps

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reckless182 (talk) 10:43, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dubai transliteration

Your transliteration and IPA notation for the name Dubai weren't Arabic and the transliteration was erroneously tagged as DIN 31635. Somebody corrected the transliteration and I corrected the Arabic pronunciation. Thanks. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 14:08, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Aikclaes (talk) 08:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bank Gothic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Microgramma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Carles Busquets, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 09:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your filing at WP:3O

Hello Aikclaes. Unfortunately I have had to undo your filing at WP:3O as it failed to comply with the instructions, and it removed the instructions that other editors might need when they make their requests there. If you want to make a new request there, please read the instructions first, and please follow them. In particular: please include a link to the talk page section where the issue is being discussed; please don't argue the case on the WP:3O page; please only edit between the HTML comments, where it says, and don't overwrite the example in the instructions. Regards, --Stfg (talk) 12:46, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for pointing that out. I have made a new filing now and I hope it's correct. Otherwise please tell me what's wrong about it. Aikclaes (talk) 13:04, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No, it isn't. You've once again overwritten the instructions; once again you discussed the matter on the 3O page; and again you did not link to the talk page. However, now that it's being discussed by several more editors at WT:MOS, this issue is no longer a candidate for a third opinion. Sorry. --Stfg (talk) 13:16, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for you time. Aikclaes (talk) 13:27, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marie Serneholt

If you want to, please take a look at this weeks TAFI selected article, Marie Serneholt. Regards.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Henok Goitom - Compromise

Hi there CLAES, from Portugal (this is the same guy from the message titled "Wrong info", now without an account, I had a serious run-in with a troll and asked an admin to vanish my account because I had the intention of leaving forever, guess I cannot, I'm wiki-hooked),

Can we please reach some compromise here? Tons of articles have the CLUB CAREER starting with the place where the player was born, but OK, out of respect for your work we'll leave it like that. However, if possible, please "work with me" in two things: 1 - full name of club in intro, compression is for box; 2 - we could title the section "Early life" since it's in the beginning of article, rather that "Personal life", don't you agree?

Granted, "AIK Fotboll" is the club's official name, but this moniker is very rarely used in Swedish media. It's not like Liverpool, where the media sometimes writes "Liverpool FC". In Sweden, it's just "AIK". Aikclaes (talk) 12:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for any inconvenience, continue the good work --84.90.219.128 (talk) 20:19, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, a small favour if you can: I have just improved Kennedy Bakircioglu's article significantly, with several references. But can you add a translation to the source #20? I can't make anything of it. Happy 2016, thank you in advance! --84.90.219.128 (talk) 15:53, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a reference, as you requested. Feel free to tidy it up, becuase am bad at this. Happy new year! Aikclaes (talk) 12:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your assistance, but there is still something missing in Bakircioglu's article. Could you please translate the title of the reference #20 ("Kennedy sköt upp Bajen till allsvenskan")? Have a pleasant 2016 as well! --84.90.219.128 (talk) 16:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, is it possible to translate Kennedy's reference #20 or not (I imagine that, being Swedish, it will only take you 30 seconds or so)? If I am bothering, at least direct me to another Swedish user so I can ask them please. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 03:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sorry about the delay. Aikclaes (talk) 06:13, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problems, sometimes I forget (most) users have a real life away from all of this... Thanks, all the best! --84.90.219.128 (talk) 00:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Small favour

Not for me, my fellow user, for our WP... Can you please arrange a reference (one will be enough, don't want do give you too much trouble) in Swedish for Andreas Ravelli's storyline (with reference to his main clubs and his 41 caps for Sweden)? An overzealous admin has removed the entire storyline twice, and I don't think there will be anything available for this guy in English, other than the fact he is Thomas' brother (already sourced).

If you can't or won't do it, don't worry I understand. Thank you for listening and happy weekend --Be Quiet AL (talk) 20:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to start it myself, but my level of Swedish is close to ZERO, and most of the refs (even though I type "Andreas (not Thomas, ANDREAS!) Ravelli" in the search engine (Swedish Yahoo)) speak more of his brother than himself... --Be Quiet AL (talk) 18:19, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well? Nothing can be done man? The storyline will soon be removed, I know that administrator... --Be Quiet AL (talk) 22:56, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, not interested. Aikclaes (talk) 11:54, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problems, happy editing --Be Quiet AL (talk) 17:01, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It varies, sometimes they call him Adrien, sometimes Silva. What he has on his shirt is irrelevant I think, I remember when Guti (footballer) played and he had GUTI HAZ on his shirt to honour his children; Portuguese sport broadcasters have this horrible custom of addressing 99,9999999999999999% of the footballers by two names (and sometimes THREE, Nuno André Coelho) 99,9999999999999999% of the time, you can trust me on this.

Also, I apologize for my summary that seemed to irritate you, but it was never my intention to do so even though I admit it was a bit exaggerated. What I meant by "I am Portuguese OK?" was that because of my nationality I have/had knowledge of this, not meaning I am a better editor than you or anyone because of that. --Be Quiet AL (talk) 20:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your argument didn't irritate me. I just quoted you verbatim. It's up to other readers to decide if your argument about being Portuguese is valid. Aikclaes (talk) 05:54, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I am glad you are not upset. Regarding this whole issue, I have now started a discussion at WP:FOOTY, please leave your opinion there if you want, it would be appreciated. --Be Quiet AL (talk) 20:14, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You declined to participate in the discussion (maybe you were not aware of it even though I mentioned in the line above I was starting one, not accusing you of anything, just pointing it out, mistakes happen), as pretty much everyone. No worries fellow user, article stays how you want. I will keep my opinion on how the player should be addressed to myself.

Happy editing --Be Quiet AL (talk) 19:17, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't find the discussion.

It has already been moved to the archives (please read here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_104#Naming_customs_with_a_Portuguese_approach). --Be Quiet AL (talk) 01:45, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Aikclaes. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aikclaes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. Aikclaes (talk) 10:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm afraid we can't do anything about a block on an IP address unless you tell us what IP address it is. Please post a new unblock request giving us that information, which will be given in the message you see when you try to edit. Alternatively, if for any reason you prefer not to make your IP address publicly visible, you can request an unblock through the Unblock Ticket Request System. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Aikclaes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17687 was submitted on Mar 05, 2017 17:01:01. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Your recent editing history at Tottenham Hotspur F.C. shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Giant Snowman 07:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello,

I see you've made multiple adjustments on the maps of 2017–18 Bundesliga and 2017–18 Serie A. May I encourage you to use the preview function to visualize your changes before saving them? This way you can make several changes in one edit, which is more efficient and helps us other users have a clear understanding of what changes were made, instead of having to go through 11 successive edits. Thank you. Bob von Schlumpfenberg (talk) 18:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bob von Schlumpfenberg: There is a reason for this. Because I want the maps to look good in both mobile and desktop view, I edit and save in desktop view and then review the saved edit in mobile view. Aikclaes (talk) 06:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Having said that, I will try to reduce the number of edits, to help other views review my edits. Getting better all the time. :) Aikclaes (talk) 08:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, thank you for clarifying this! Bob von Schlumpfenberg (talk) 14:38, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IPA for Brighton and Hove

Hello. Personally, I think the IPA should cover Hove as well. Presumably the IPA is there primarily to help the reader unfamiliar with BritEng pronunciation, and Hove could just as likely rhyme with Love or Prove as with Stove. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 10:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Struway2 Thanks for your comment. I totally agree, especially since "Hove" can be tricky to pronounce, as you mentioned. My issue was just that it would be more elegant to have IPA for the full club name. Now the IPA just covers part of the name. Or break out "Brighton & Hove" and have IPA for just that, but since the club rarely is referred to that way, as you pointed out, that's wouldn't be good either. So better leave it till someone smarter than me comes up with a solution. :) Aikclaes (talk) 10:35, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Aikclaes. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joel Kinnaman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tarik Elyounoussi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marocco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, I'm Matthew hk. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Henok Goitom, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Matthew_hk t c 13:45, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look

..at the article about Kenneth Gärdestad if you wish. I will nominate it for DYK in a few days time and any improvements are welcome. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 23:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Magnus Pehrsson, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 13:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heradi Rashidi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Viktor Gyökeres. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 13:01, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is that really true, Giant, that adding unsourced content can get me blocked? Have you sourced every single thing you have added throughout the years? I see loads of unsourced sentences in any random article. Aikclaes (talk) 15:48, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes. See WP:WHYBLOCK - "persistent posts of unreferenced, poorly or incorrectly referenced, or potentially defamatory information about living persons". It applies to non-living people as well. If you see unsourced material then tag it with {{cn}} or remove it. Giant Snowman 15:55, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Viktor Gyökeres. Giant Snowman 11:42, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And a very nice day to you too, Giant Snowman. Aikclaes (talk) 12:37, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aikclaes. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aikclaes. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at William Eskelinen. Giant Snowman 11:12, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Your recent editing history at Star Wars shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. General Ization ^Talk 05:26, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bolon (eyewear brand)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bolon (eyewear brand), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hitro talk 12:08, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. You said I created a page about a brand of sunglasses, Bolon, because it's a large brand and it has no Wikipedia page. That is not a criterion for having a Wikipedia page, a company must meet our sourcing and notability requirements.

Please read the following regarding writing an article

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the comapany, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls which are subject to link rot. Most of your references were not independent third-party sources, but were posted by the company, quoted company spokespeople or were reviewing their products.
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. Without proper sources, however big this company is, your article can't show notability.

you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. You said are positioned in the mid-range, or "affordable luxury", segment, sourced to a company that's going to sell them and clearly promotional. You then went on to even more blatantly give us the suggested price, unusual to say the least in supposedly neutral encyclopaedia articles
there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
positioned in the mid-range, or "affordable luxury", segment (with a retail price of around US$ 120) is taken verbatim from here You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
Looking at your recent editing pattern, I need to say that if you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Aikclaes. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Aikclaes|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:54, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jimfbleak, thanks for your reply. I have nothing to do with the company (or AIK). I thought I could write a decent start for the article, and then other users could improve it to meet all the standards. I didn't know everything had to be perfect straight away. Aikclaes (talk) 11:37, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that clarification. It's not a matter of "perfect", it's a matter of meeting our requirements. If you post an article in article space, you are indicating that you think it is ready for publication, and it will be assessed on that basis. If you don't want that to happen, then write it as a draft initially. Drafts have a degree of protection because they can't be deleted on notability or referencing issues alone, but they can still be deleted for other problems such as copyright violations and advertising. For obvious reasons, article about companies or products are particularly likely to attract scrutiny Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:12, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for your help Jimfbleak.

January 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Dimitar Berbatov. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:14, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FC Seoul article

Thanks for polishing article. Where are you from? In current English trend, Hyphen is not used a lot. Mobile phone more used than Mobile-phone.Footwiks (talk) 14:20, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Footwiks. True, "mobile phone" is correct and "mobile-phone" is incorrect. But in this case we're talking about a compound modifier, so it should be written "mobile-phone company". You can read about this on the wiki page for compound modifier. (I grew up in England and have a degree in English linguistics.) Aikclaes (talk) 02:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I saw now you have changed back my corrections. After you have read up on compound modifiers, maybe you can correct the article? I was planning on continuing to polish the article, but if I have discuss basic stuff like this I can't be bothered. Aikclaes (talk) 02:14, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Henok Goitom

Hello there,

I tried to bring the article in accordance with WP policy regarding football articles, several times (the guideline is, for athletes with double nationality, to leave the last nationality (in Mr. Goitom's case Eritrean) or none at all, explaining the situation in the last line of intro). Unfortunately, even though I explain it in the summary, you are not accepting the change.

I have tried a new approach, maybe you will allow this one (but please, we are not supposed to write "X-born Y footballer" in the lede, please ask at WP:FOOTY to see that I am not lying)? Thank you. --193.137.135.2 (talk) 12:00, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the info. I will do like you say from now on. Aikclaes (talk) 12:07, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you as well for the reply. Continue the good work --193.137.135.2 (talk) 09:20, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Darijan Bojanić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bosnian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Junes Barny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of AIK Fotboll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orlando City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sam-Cooke

Greetings. This is a partial-apology. When I saw you initial reasons for your re-revert (a hyphen is really useful here!), my initial impression was of a barracks room lawyer (does that need to be hyphenated?) enforcing the minutiae of arcane Wikipedian rules. When I finally looked at your User page, I discovered that you are an expert on the subject, and the article, which I skimmed, showed that what you and your fellow grammarians are doing may, in fact, be useful. My main point about my strong-side-of-middling-erudition is not how special I am, but that I've been looking at "Civil Rights" for a long time without ever seeing a hyphen before your edit. It looked like change for its own sake, without substance, and I reverted it. That was a mistake.

When I read, "You should be happy"—or much worse, "You should be grateful"—I assume that I'm dealing with someone who thinks that his/her tucchus is candy. I did myself no good by mocking you, but it was fun.

As I said above, what you and others interested in clear communications are doing looks useful, so I apologize for mocking it. I apologize to myself for mocking you. Regards Tapered (talk) 00:20, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tapered for the explanation and partial apology. Well, you did write my edit was stupid before I said you should be happy for it. Anyway, all the best. Aikclaes (talk) 14:37, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did. I thought it pointless, and that replication would be stupid. That was a mistake, also. Regards Tapered (talk) 09:44, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Wake Me Up Before You Go-Go, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 23:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SummerPhDv2.0. I found it weird that on the band's wiki page Wham are categorized as "pop" while the songs I edited are categorized using the much narrower genre "dance-pop", a genre that, in my opinion, came into prominence in the late 80s and is more electronic sounding. That's why I changed the songs to the wider definition "pop". I think categorizing these songs as "dance-pop" would need sources, but hardly needed for "pop". What are your thoughts on this? Aikclaes (talk) 03:09, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion between you and me on your talk page isn't a good way to establish a consensus. Please raise the issue on the articles' talk pages. That way, if anyone is interested in the issue now or wants to see where any changes came from, it's connected to the article. - SummerPhD^v2.0 03:20, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Orup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supergroup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Space opera

Please do not change references to space opera to be space-opera. This term is not hyphenated, and you are changing direct links to redirect links that only go back to space opera anyway. I notice you've been doing this for some time now. Canterbury Tail talk 18:20, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Canterbury Tail, may I humbly advise you to educate yourself on a subject before miscorrecting? You seem to be unaware of the grammatical phenomenon called compound modifiers. There is a Wikipedia article about it. There they use the example phrases "heavy metal detector" and "heavy-metal detector" to make the difference obvious. A "space opera franchise", without the hyphen, is an opera franchise set in space. Aikclaes (talk) 15:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are changing direct links to be indirect links that just redirect back. The actual space opera article disagrees with you as to the naming and grammatical construction of the genre. The genre is named without a hyphen, no matter the compound construction normal in everyday English. If you have an issue with the hyphenation you should take it up at the space opera article, but for now please stop changing direct links to be indirect links that disagree with the article. Additionally per WP:BRD, you have boldly made changes, it's been disagreed with, it's up to you to get consensus for the change and to not re-revert. Canterbury Tail talk 15:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't understand the point, Canterbury Tail. I have no issue with spelling the genre "space opera", without an hyphen. But in this case, it's a compund modifier, and should be hyphenated. Did you even read the Wiki article on the subject to educate yourself before miscorrecting again? I had this exact same debate with one or two others a few years back, and they read the article on compound modifiers and realized they were wrong. Consensus was reached, 100%. Aikclaes (talk) 16:15, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've self reverted while I read up on it. Wikipedia isn't a source, so I'm reading around the other sources. Seems I may well have been far too hasty and harsh and do indeed actually owe you an apology for this. The thing that trips me up is that "space opera" on itself is a solid term and it seems odd to amend something that's ostensibly a noun, but being converted to an adjective. I think that's the bit my brain is rebelling against. And it seems that's a usual exception, if they're both or are collectively a noun, it's normally not hyphenated. Even the Wikipedia page you pointed me to states that as an exception which would render the compound modifier correct as "space opera" and not "space-opera" according to the article and the sources. Canterbury Tail talk 16:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Antony (footballer, born 2000), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at West End Girls, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 15:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that escalated super quickly in a passive aggressive way. Bringing out the block threat straight away. Classy. The existing genre labels also

don't have

sources. And you mean to tell me there was a vibrant disco scene in the mid 80s? Trese wasn't. Disco had been dead for half a decade. The song has all the trade marks of post-disco. A bit sad you aren't capable of acknowledging that. Aikclaes (talk) 16:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the existing genres aren't sourced they should be removed.

Regarding your change to to post-disco: We have a guideline at WP:EXPLICITGENRE that does not allow for the kind of contemplation of context that you engaged in. If a source says "disco" but you know that it occurred after the main disco scene, you would still enter the genre of "disco". Binksternet (talk) 16:14, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Everton F.C. supporters

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Everton F.C. supporters, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:43, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]