User talk:Ajeebtha

Adding reference to Wikipedia articles[edit]

Hello Ajeebtha! Please do not forget to add references from reliable sources for the content you add to Wikipedia. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Adding well-formatted references is easy.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite". Click on it.
Then click on "templates".
Choose the most appropriate template and then fill all relevant details. You can start with the field (e.g. URL) that has a magnifying glass icon and then click the magnifying glass to automatically populate the fields for you.

This will add a well-formatted reference, which will allow other people to see where you got your information from. You can read more about this at Help:Edit toolbar, or watch this video: File:RefTools.ogv. Thanks and regards. —DBig Xrayᗙ 07:51, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

to use this message place {{subst:User:DBigXray/ref}} on User_talk

DBig Xrayᗙ 07:51, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ajeebtha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Aradhana (1969 film). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kailash29792 (talk) 12:58, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb as a reference[edit]

Hi there, re: these changes, IMDb is not generally considered a reliable source by the Wikipedia community. WP:RS/IMDB, WP:RS, WP:TVFAQ. IMDb is user-contributed, meaning anyone can submit content to IMDb. IMDb doesn't vet all of the content that is submitted. This means the source is inherently unreliable. Other examples of user-generated sources that should not be used are discussion forums, unverified Twitter accounts, Wikia.com and even Wikipedia itself. Please see WP:RS for more information on what does qualify as a reliable source. Please note also that improperly sourced content suggesting that the film is inspired from other films can come across as a subtle accusation of plagiarism, which is why it's important that it be properly sourced. If you read further along in the article, a Times of India reviewer noted similarities between the film and other films, but that observation is attributed directly to them and is presented as an observation, not as a fact. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kaabil, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [1][2] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:43, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's clear apparent that Kaabil is inspired from the three movies. Any person who has seen all 4 movies knows. 3 movies spoken about were made in 1984 1985 1986 respectively. So it's not plagiarism. :It's inspiration. Public must be made aware of the fact. Why are you removing basic fact unnecessarily. It's openly available. All 3 movies are for people to see. Online articles too acknowledge that :Kaabilis inspired from these 3 movies.

Hope you are not some fan who is trying to hide that Kaabil is inspired one!Ajeebtha (talk) 16:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's interpretive, so it requires a reliable source. Otherwise, it's considered original research. If it's so apparent, presumably there would be sufficient references to bolster the claim. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Muqabla (1979 film)[edit]

Hello, Ajeebtha,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Muqabla (1979 film) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muqabla (1979 film) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

-- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 05:28, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic edit[edit]

Hi there, your edit here reintroduced problematic content into the article that had previously been fixed.

typographical errors like "it's" when we mean "its", and the director's name being misspelled Bhansalis when it should be Bhansali
a misquote of the word "grand" when the source says "grander"
ambiguous (and unsourced) language about Ranveer Singh's antagonist role
your edit removes a reference supporting content about a vandalism attack
your edit restored the fluffy POV statement describing a critic as "reputed"
your edit re-introduced an unsourced assertion that the film is a remake of another film.

Please don't revert changes or restore older versions of articles like this, as you create more problems than you intend to fix. Your edit has been reverted as it is overall not constructive. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Padmavati (film) - Please stop resubmitting contested content.[edit]

Hi there, please stop resubmitting this. Another editor has contested this, so your recourse is to seek consensus for inclusion by opening a discussion on the article's talk page. Resubmitting it as you've done here and here and here without consensus is considered disruptive, and if you submit it again without consensus, you will have your editing privileges interrupted. Note also that the fundamental problem with the assertion, is that the source you used doesn't say that the 2017 Padmavati film is an "unofficial remake" of the 1963 Tamil film. The reference, which was written in 2015, only says that another film on the subject exists. Your conclusion that it is a remake, is pure conjecture. There's also no clear reason to bring up another film in this article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ajeebtha. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rishi Kapoor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bobby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Soviet films of the year by ticket sales (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Aradhana

Sachin Bhowmick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Raja Rani

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rajesh Khanna, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.

Please familiarise yourself with what Wikipedia considers to be a reliable source. Thank you! bonadea contributions talk 18:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muktha Srinivasan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ninaivil Nindraval and Bommalattam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ajeebtha. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ajeebtha. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

kader khan[edit]

please add a source to this addition [3]--DBig Xrayᗙ 18:23, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roti_(1974_film) Roti was produced by Rajesh Khanna. https://nationnext.in/kader-khan-passes-away-at-81/ says only at Khanna s insistence Kader was paid 121000Ajeebtha (talk) 18:42, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ajeebtha nationnext.in does not appear to me as a reliable source (WP:RS) they probably have copied this content from wikipedia to puslish it there see WP:CIRCULAR--DBig Xrayᗙ 18:51, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But who was producer? Director can pay only if producer permits. Ajeebtha (talk) 18:53, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ajeebtha, I agree but you will need a reliable source such as trusted newspaper or a book which says that Rajesh Khanna said so and so. Unless we have such a solid source we cannot mention it in the article. Even if Khanna was the producer, it is quite possible he had left the entire decision of writer on his Director. the Rediff interview article where Kader Khan talks about this incident does not mention Khanna. So I don't believe Khanna was involved. If so, then Kader Khan would have known and mentioned this in that interview or somewhere.
Please find a good source for that information before adding to the article. You can use the Talk:Kader Khan for any further discussion. cheers. --DBig Xrayᗙ 18:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kumkum (actress), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Babita (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pehchaan

Manoj Kumar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pehchaan

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited J. Om Prakash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raja Rani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moushumi Chatterjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ghayal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Shreyas Iyer, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:47, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ramanand Sagar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arzoo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:24, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joshiy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rajkumar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shashikala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sargam.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm KyloRen3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dilip Kumar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. KyloRen3 (talk) 07:10, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Awam (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. KyloRen3 (talk) 07:14, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Farah (actress), you may be blocked from editing. KyloRen3 (talk) 07:15, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Your edit to Sowcar Janaki has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 16:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Suneye1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shalini, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - SUNEYE1 17:35, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ramesh Deo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ashanti and Prem Nagar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bappi Lahiri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adhikar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gulshan Nanda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daag.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abrar Alvi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suraj.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]