User talk:Alancano2006nj

Please do not add or change content, as you did at International Academy of Trenton, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 23:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi and thanks for your message on my talk page. Unfortunately your own personal knowledge of a topic does not count as a reliable source on wikipedia, that is original research. Wikipedia relies on content that has been reported in secondary sources. Please do not keep adding information unless you can provide such a source (e.g. a newspaper or journal article, a book, etc). Thank you, Melcous (talk) 08:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Well, I also have info from them, the International Academy of Trenton, so you better put that info you deleted today back on there!

April 2017

Hello, I'm Kostas20142. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User:Melcous— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kostas20142 (talk) 16:50, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User:Melcous. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kostas20142 (talk) 16:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to International Academy of Trenton. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Melcous (talk) 05:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at International Academy of Trenton. Melcous (talk) 22:19, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

It doesn't matter if the information is from the school itself or your personal knowledge, it needs to be sourced. Particularly a direct quote cannot be included without a source. Either find a reliable source or stop adding the information. If you don't do either, next time I will report you for disruptive editing. Melcous (talk) 02:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanamonde (talk) 13:15, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chambers Lofts

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chambers Lofts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alansohn (talk) 22:19, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stream Finity

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stream Finity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 17:03, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]