User talk:Albanman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia!!![edit]

Hello Albanman! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing!  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  21:38, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

Names of the Episcopal Church[edit]

Please don't invent new names for the Episcopal Church. The article itself carefully explains what the official names are in the relevant section, and the lead should confine itself to the most commonly used of the two. The change you made introduced two names which are not the official name, and took out the official one used in the lead. Tb (talk) 01:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite right that there are two official names, but Encyclopedia Britannica is quite wrong about what they are. They are, as the article explains, "The Episcopal Church" and "The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America." Tb (talk) 19:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits and minor countries[edit]

Two points: First, I see you're marking many edits as "minor". Perhaps you have "Mark all edits as minor" set in your preferences. Minor edits are those that don't change the content, such as spelling corrections or formatting changes. Adding or removing content isn't minor. See WP:MINOR. Second, I see you added Andorra to the list of neutral states in WWI, but you didn't provide a reference. After an editor questioned it I checked the History of Andorra, and the New York Times archive, both of which say that Andorra declared war. So I've removed Andorra from WWI. If you have s source for the information let's discuss it on Talk:World War I. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I thought you'd like to know that Iktae has been unblocked. I believe it was a misunderstanding and that Iktae is not a sock puppet. Thank you for the manner in which you have handled the situation, you have been polite and courteous, and I hope you accept my apology for any inconvenience caused by the block. Hopefully you'll both stick around wikipedia and contribute to the encyclopedia. Happy editing, Nev1 (talk) 16:23, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've nominated Ivan Ziatyk, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC) (nominated on behalf of User:Piotrus)[reply]

DYK for Ivan Ziatyk[edit]

Courcelles 12:03, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name of Ukraine[edit]

I noticed your reverting my edit of Nicholas Charnetsky. There may be some Ukrainians who, as you do, prefer to use the definite article when referring to their country but Wikipedia uses generally accepted grammar that is supported by a reliable source. Indeed, the definite article has been used with the name Ukraine in English for many years, but this has recently changed. See Name of Ukraine#Syntax which refers to the style guides of respected magazines using the name Ukraine without the article adjective. There are certainly Ukrainian expatriates and people of Ukrainian descent who support the change. If you have some reliable source to support reversing this change, please post it here. Otherwise we should consider a consensus supports the lack of the definite article in simple references to Ukraine. Thank you for your work on an interesting article. --Fartherred (talk) 05:03, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User IndieRect has removed the definite articles in question. If this meets with approval, there is no more need to comment. --Fartherred (talk) 02:40, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nice to hear from you, Albanman, regards to your friend, happy editing. --Fartherred (talk) 18:22, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on the article! I noticed that your references are not using the {{Cite web}} template - this is highly recommended, and I encourage you to use it in the future. I will be going over the article and editing for encyclopedic style, so if you get to the references first, that's great, but I will most likely fix them as I go. Thanks! –Paul M. Nguyen (chat|blame) 13:32, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your nice note. This debate is rather too hard for me, both in terms of Franciscan sensitivities and also in terms of good Wikipedia writing. So I'm happy to leave it to others.

But for what it's worth, I think the order of priority is the general reader first, and only then others more closely associated with the subject. The priority should surely be to make the opening as easy to read from the perspective of someone knowing nothing, and my clumsy attempt at humour was my way of trying to express what it read like to me.

Glad you are in touch with Fr Seed: I have been a fan of his since I saw him on television a long time ago in After_Dark_(TV_series). Incidentally I am not a monk at Heiligenkreuz: this is not a case of WP:COI ! Cistercian (talk) 09:16, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy Albannman. Concerning an edit you made (way back) on 30 September 2008. We prefer to use Pope in the intros of those articles, not Bishop of Rome. GoodDay (talk) 14:48, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In Our Lady of Kibeho, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Evangelist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Bournville, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prince Félix of Luxembourg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ambrose Griffiths may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • aged, 82, at Saint Mary's, during the afternoon of 14 June 2011. He is buried at Ampleforth Abbey]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Community of the Chemin Neuf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Howard James Hubbard may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Appointed by [[Pope John Paul II]] to the Vatican's Secretariat for Non-Christians (now the [[Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue]], he is a supporter of the [[ecumenism|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:28, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Margaret Sinclair (nun), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited European Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Rite. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Elizium23. Your recent edit to the page John Corapi appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 19:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:John Corapi#June 17th resignation[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:John Corapi#June 17th resignation. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 19:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Albanman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Horatio Spafford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern front. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Albanman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Albanman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Albanman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]