User talk:AlexWogan

Ways to improve Marco Pasqua

Hello, AlexWogan,

Thank you for creating Marco Pasqua.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hello! After reviewing this article, I am concerned that Marco Pasqua might not meet our standards for notability. Wikipedia's standards are higher than you might expect, and simply being an accomplished person does not necessarily qualify someone for an article. Our basic notability requirement, WP:GNG, requires that a person has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to be deemed notable. The article's references right now are inundated with sources that are WP:PRIMARY. Hopefully you're able to find secondary coverage!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ThadeusOfNazereth}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 01:53, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 15:47, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Anne Barrington per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anne Barrington. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 10:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]