User talk:Alexander Gellos

Welcome!

Hello, Alexander Gellos! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Dougweller (talk) 10:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

First Battle of Tapae

Because the text you added was so short (what we call a stub), I've reinstated the redirect and added your text to the main article where it will be more useful. Dougweller (talk) 10:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Legio IX Hispana

I can't imagine what you thought you were trying to do by blanking this page, but please don't do it again. While I'm thinking about it, could you explain your edits as you make them using WP:Edit summaries? Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 10:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Battle of Halys

Please don't remove the {{unreferenced}} template from the article. As all articles should contain references, the template needs to stay so that helpful (and knowledgeable) editors can be guided to the article. Favonian (talk) 16:10, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of Raphia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• had designs on the boader region of [[Coele-Syria]], recently taken by Egypt. Pharaoh [Ptolemy IV]] was not a loved or respected ruler. Ptolemy was so unpopular, that his generals and governors
• ref>The Ptolemaic currency had already been debased under [[Ptolemy V Epiphanes|Ptolemy V]] ([[F. W. Walbank]], ''The Hellenistic World'' 1981:119.</ref> by the cost of the war itself. The [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:55, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Battle of Zela

You need sources for the casualty figures (including 'probably the entire army'). As for you question about infoboxes, ask at the WP:Help desk. I'm not a big fan of infoboxes as too often we try to express a complicated or disputed issue in a tiny number of words when we use them. Dougweller (talk) 08:59, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Battle of Arcole

Hi. Thanks for seeking to move "The Battle of Arcole" to the more logical name Battle of Arcole. A passing tip - when you want to move a page it is better to use the "Move" function instead of cutting and pasting the text to the new title. If you cut and paste the text we lose the page history, which is an essential requirement as all Wikipedia edits must be attributable to the editors who made them. I've fixed it in this instance.

Sometimes the move function won't work (for example, if there is already an article at the proposed new name), in which case feel free to post possible page moves at Wikipedia:Requested moves.

Hope this is helpful, and if I misunderstood what you were seeking with the page move, please let me know. Euryalus (talk) 12:58, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Talavera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IV Corps. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Your recent editing history at Battle of Marengo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Aoidh (talk) 21:03, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Jena–Auerstedt

added links pointing to Lannes, Bernadotte and Murat

Battle of Hohenfriedberg

added a link pointing to Frederick II

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Edit history messages

Alexander Gellos (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

From the list of your contributions I see that you are not leaving any comment in the edit history. You need to start doing this particularly when you make large edits like this this one (see WP:UNRESPONSIVE).

If you make an edit and it is reverted then you should discuss the changes you want to make on the talk page and seek a consensus for them before reinserting them (see WP:CAUTIOUS and WP:BRD)

-- PBS (talk) 08:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Unexplained edits -- PBS (talk) 09:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Prussian Infantry Regiment No. 3 attacking during the battle.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Prussian Infantry Regiment No. 3 attacking during the battle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Prussian infantry advance at Leuthen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Prussian infantry advance at Leuthen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia

With regards to this edit. You must not copy text from one Wikipedia page to another one without adequate attrition see Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Copying within Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Wikiepdia takes breaches of copyright very seriously and repeat offenders are blocked. -- PBS (talk) 22:37, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet

I have reason to believe from the edit history of your account and this IP address are edit being made by the same editor. As you are making edits to the same pages with the two accounts you either need to stop using IP address or declare the ip addresses and this user account to be one and the same account by placing the information on the user page of both accounts (See "Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts" (WP:ILLEGIT and WP:SOCK#NOTIFY).

If you continue to use IP addresses or deny that you are doing so I will ask for a WP:CHECKUSER to settle the issue. If on the other hand you acknowledge that you made those edits and you would like those IP addresses (but not the edit) removed from the edit history I can do that.-- PBS (talk) 12:30, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Battle on the ice

Would you please stop moving this page randomly around to wrong names. The names is pretty much unambiguous, if you do not like it pls discuss. It is no fun to fix double redirects to delete junk which you have created. Continuation will likely result in a block.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:14, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Battle on the Ice (Lake Peipus). This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. PatGallacher (talk) 00:36, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

And this is your last warning. Next time you will be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:36, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Cretopolis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Battle of Cretopolis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ccancients.net/Maps/Wars-of-the-Successors-323-281-BC/jd31-cretopolis-319-bc.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KTo288 (talk) 20:11, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Recent moves

Please do not move pages (a) without explanation and (b) to titles that do not conform with WP:MOS. For the proper procedure to follow, see WP:RM. —Srnec (talk) 01:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

I can only concur with this: your repeatedly moving pages is becoming borderline to vandalism. Please discuss such things first to acquire consensus before making such contested moves. -- fdewaele, 7 March 2015, 14:20 CET

Are you sure you know what you are doing? Getting awfully close to a block for disruptive editing. Favonian (talk) 21:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

I think the block is long overdue. I do not see any constructive contributions.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page maliciously, as you did at Battle of Strasbourg. Favonian (talk) 22:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive edit warring using both this account and your IP, as you did at Battle of Strasbourg. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Favonian (talk) 22:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Nicopolis ad Istrum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philippopolis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear Alexander Gellos, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Battle of Agrigentum (456). Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 21:44, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Alexander Gellos. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)