User talk:Alexius08/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
What make you thank you have the write to post false info about FrancisLightHose?
What make you thank you have the write to post false info about FrancisLightHose? Do I post any bad info about you and your username? No, the answer would be. So stop posting false info about FrancisLightHouse and you due not have the write to due that. I will be back to see what you have sed to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.249.235.100 (talk) 23:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Ta
Thanks for reverting that vandalism to my page :) - Kingpin13 (talk) 11:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC) Kingpin13 (talk) 11:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism alert
You have been paged because a user has reported a high level of vandalism and you are listed as a contact.
This is an automatically generated message. If problems occur, please contact User:nathanww. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The King's a-poopin' (talk • contribs) 12:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Cookie
Papercutbiology♫ (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! Unsure if this is considered a barn star...but what the heck. A cookie is a cookie. Enjoy. :]
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
future internet
hi alexius, i wanted to contact you because of the changes you did to the "future internet" and "management of the future internet" page. i am the editor of the first, and also in touch with the editor of the second of the two. we had a discussion and had agreed to keep the entries separated, the reason being that there are far more "ingredients" of "future internet", which would occupy too much space on this "future internet" start page soon, and linking is probably preferrable.
so, is it ok for you if we politely ask to undo your change (the redirect etc.)? of course we value your input and were actually quite happy to see that someone really thinks in the same way as we do and hopefully we can further improve the quality of the articles. for example, i want to create an alias to "future internet", and call it "future of the internet" - how would i do that?
i am still learning wikipedia stuff, so i'm not too familiar with some of the conventions and processes. i assume you are one of the famous "watchers" for quality etc.?
thanks and regards, frank —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andersen Frank (talk • contribs) 12:31, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for reminding me; I'll start a rewrite immediately. Alexius08 (talk) 13:08, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
More info - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 14:19, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 14:34, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Sterling Ruby External Links
Dear Alexius08. Sterling Ruby is officialy represented in Europe by Xavier Hufkens. I don't see why a link to this site is not appropriate when there are links to Metro Pictures, Foxy Productions and Spruth/Magers who represent this artist in the USA and the UK. If you don't agree, please let me know. Best, sidevold. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sidevold (talk • contribs) 09:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
FabioAbazaj
I am sorry for provoking your possible anger. I did this in order to keep the page clean of that templates. You know I checked my references in order to provide valid sources, and this time they were accurate. But the templates are showing again and again. So, I do delete them... —Preceding unsigned comment added by FabioAbazaj (talk • contribs) 10:11, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi! I have replied on my page--85.226.46.215 (talk) 14:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Original thread from User talk:85.226.46.215
- I do not understand? That was developing and clarifying the title of the section in accordance with the text? --85.226.46.215 (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- I think that using periods on the title would make the article inconsistent in formatting. Sorry if I reverted it instead of just altering. Alexius08 (talk) 14:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- I see. Perhaps you are right. The title just seemed to lack something to me; it seemed to be uncomplete I guess. Perhaps you have a better suggestion. --85.226.46.215 (talk) 14:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'd suggest renaming that section into "Career", describing the contents best. Alexius08 (talk) 14:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, but the whole article mainly treats that subject; this section concentrates on her career in Finland as a historical pioneer and theatre reformer. --85.226.46.215 (talk) 14:53, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'd suggest renaming that section into "Career", describing the contents best. Alexius08 (talk) 14:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- I see. Perhaps you are right. The title just seemed to lack something to me; it seemed to be uncomplete I guess. Perhaps you have a better suggestion. --85.226.46.215 (talk) 14:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- I think that using periods on the title would make the article inconsistent in formatting. Sorry if I reverted it instead of just altering. Alexius08 (talk) 14:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps; the articles three sections treats: background and earliest career; the most famous part of her career; and her later career. The earliest career is treated in the Background section. Her most famous period is treated in the next section, and it require its own section, as there is a lot of things to say about this period; and her later career is treated in the last section. It is a little hard. Perhaps: Early career, Theatre reformist and Later career? I am unsure, but I feel I can trust you, (or someone else interested), to solve this. --85.226.46.215 (talk) 15:16, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- I am about to rename the two leading sections into "Early career", and "Reforms", respectively. If you think those headers mismatch with their content, you can rename them. Alexius08 (talk) 22:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- That's fine, thank you!--85.226.44.190 (talk) 10:35, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- I am about to rename the two leading sections into "Early career", and "Reforms", respectively. If you think those headers mismatch with their content, you can rename them. Alexius08 (talk) 22:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Is there a policy against including a link to a user's own company on a user's own user page? MaverickSolutions (talk) 05:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Personally, I regard it as advertising, considering your username. I may suggest you to request a username change to avoid future problems. Thank you. Alexius08 (talk) 05:16, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
CSD taggings
Just curious, where did you come across all these old spammy userpages? Someguy1221 (talk) 05:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- I searched Wikipedia for "solution" (a word often used by advertisers), which returns 8000 pages as of 07:20, 13 April 2009 (UTC). If I encounter a userpage that is promotional in tone, I just tag it with {{db-spam}}. Alexius08 (talk) 07:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Good job finding so many! -- Mentifisto 09:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Be more careful though. I have a lot of work declining all those you placed on sandboxes in userspace. Sandboxes and unfinished drafts can often contain such language but they were created to allow people to work on them, so deletion would be counter-productive. Regards SoWhy 07:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- In addition, if the first edit on such a page is an admin userfication of a previously deleted page, then it indicates that the page was userfied as the result of a good faith request to work on the page to make it less spammy. Tagging such a page just creates extra work and potentially creates an impression that wikipedia is an atmosphere of hostility for new users. It would be preferential to just leave the user a message on their talk page and ask them if they are still intending to improve the page. It may also cause confusion for a user, because the message you leave them to notify them that their page was nominated for deletion tells them that if it is deleted, that they can request an admin to userfy it.... can you see how that is circular logic? Thanks. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 17:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Good job finding so many! -- Mentifisto 09:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
re CSD User:Johanna sc/Sandbox
Just outta curiosity, can you nominate a user's sandbox if it's not an actual article? Granted, I have not really looked at the page in question in this case, I was just curious. I'm using my sandbox for some test edits that could wind up being worthy of a speedy delete, but they are merely test edits, not necessarily something I'd post live on the `pedia. Nicktfx (talk) 03:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- I see now the page is older than dirt and had issues in the past. The question still stands, though. Nicktfx (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC).
what kind of an idiot..
Dynamat is a subpage... nothing more needs to be said. Daniel Christensen (talk) 04:46, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
More info - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 13:26, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Alexis: you have issued a warning saying I was commiting vandalism at Kent Hovind's article page: Can you explain why is it so? I did submit what I think is a valid reason for deleting personal opinions out of the contents of the article. Please reply soon. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.180.187.113 (talk) 00:40, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
What the heck?
you tagged my USER PAGE for speedy deletion? it's my own darn page, lay off it. It was not full of "gibberish" yet because of hasty tagging, and because I do not log into wikipedia every day, I've since lost the information stored on it. -- DrDoog (talk) 16:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Not Spam Link
You warned me that a link I added was a "spam link" but it's not. I added a link that provides an interactive course map for the ING Georgia Marathon on the Georgia Marathon page, there is no way that link I added was spam... it's a course map for the race which any runner knows is very valuable to have. Please explain how it's a spam link, thanks. logthatrun (talk) 11:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I see so because my username is my company name that was an alarm that I might be trying to spam...? Sorry I'm new here and did not understand that I could not use my company name as my username, is that the case? If it's really a problem, we can just change my username. Let me know, thanks! Logthatrun (talk) 23:32, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Pittsburgh Marathon
The link I added back is a link for an interactive course map, why can't that link be added? Logthatrun (talk) 01:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
We have the same types of links for other races on Wiki, why would we not have one for Pittsburgh Marathon? Logthatrun (talk) 01:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
What's the point...
...of this? Which policy says you can't write "LMAO" on your own user page? —Wknight94 (talk) 02:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 17:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 14:52, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
User:Katebev MidlandHR
Hi there,
You have recently deleted my MidlandHR page. I am very sad about this and would like to work with you to edit this so that it is worthy to be on Wikipedia. Please could you provide a copy of the deleted page so that i can work on this and perhaps give me some pointers to rectify this.
thanks so much,
Kate. Katebev (talk) 10:33, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion: Gersh124
On April 14th an article was marked for speedy deletion for G11: Blatant Advertising. That is not my intention with this article. My plan is to re-publish this article and link the Brother USA article from Brother Industries LTD article as a subsidiary of the company. Please let me know what aspects of the article were considered advertising and how it differed from an article like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hewlett_Packard. Obviously their article is in compliance and the Brother USA article is not much different from their format. Thanks in advance for your insight. Again, my intention is to provide factual, unbiased information about Brother USA as a company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gersh124 (talk • contribs) 17:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Nice work man! I do have a VERY hard time beating you to it. By the way, thanks for reverting that attack on me! Leujohn (talk) 12:47, 17 May 2009 (UTC) |
Nice Work
Is it just me, or do you always beat me to vadalism? Great job man! Keep it up. Robot13 (talk) 12:54, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
User:BrandNewDay1967
Alexius08 you do know that user BrandNewDay1967 is an account which is being used for spam links? Vrabu (talk) 13:59, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
I just added some sources to the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:58, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Alexius,
Regarding your deletion nomination here, I'm a little concerned that you may have nominated this article for reasons not related to its state at the time of the nomination. While trying to assume good faith, I cannot ignore the fact that this Wikipedian clearly has some sort of vendetta against banned user MyWikiBiz. "My fellow Wikipedians, we should go for a war against MyWikiBiz" and "Führer der Feinde von MyWikiBiz", which translates to "Leader of the enemies of MyWikiBiz" indicate there may be a potential conflict of interest, if that user were to nominate his "enemy's" articles for deletion. There are indications that this Yahoo user could be you, including the phrase "No outside influences! No mercy!" appearing on both your page and the Yahoo user's. If this is the case and you are this Yahoo account, I'd ask you to withdraw your nomination of the article, which has improved considerably since the nomination anyway. I worry that a legitimate Wikipedia process, in this case, AFD, could be used in such a "war" on a banned user who can't do much to prevent it. Wikipedia's policy on banned users is pretty clear that declaring "war" on banned users isn't appropriate. Wikipedia wants them to walk away not angry, able to let go of whatever the argument was, and move on.
There's also a problem with the way you're conducting Google searches for potential reliable sources. As pointed out by another editor on the nomination page, you've done a search using Latin Google, which will not normally return very many good results for an American company. It might be best to use English-language Google when conducting searches on American companies. Better still, since the company is a historic entity apparently founded in 1838, newspaper archives might be a better way to search for historic information. I have a subscription to NewspaperArchive, which pulls up tons of old news articles that Google will never see. My membership includes giving someone else a free month of membership, and I'd be happy to give you a one-month gift subscription. Let me know if you're interested.
Best, Firsfron of Ronchester 07:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
I share the concerns that Firsfron has set forth. Please refrain from any further interaction with or concerning MyWikiBiz or its owner, either on or off Wikipedia. Newyorkbrad (talk) 02:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello Alexius08
The reason I think that this band I enjoy immensely should be accepted on Wikipedia is that they have started a whole new GENRE of music, "Electro Nu Wave Disco." Eventually I plan to try a page about this as well, but I'm frankly surprised Wikipedia has become so narrow in its scope. If other bands have pages on Wikipedia for lesser deeds then I need a better answer as to why Scotchontherocks (talk) 08:28, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:GoogleEarth Image of ascot.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:GoogleEarth Image of ascot.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Alexius08 (talk) 03:47, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
i undid your revision on pandora hearts because here is no "later revealed" in character sections any information on a character that is important should not be said "later revealed" because the information doesn't contradict.
if there is a bit of information that contradicts the new information. you put in "later revealed"71.32.58.39 (talk) 02:35, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for reverting that spot of vandalism to my user page whilst I was offline, really appreciated, all the best SpitfireTally-ho! 08:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey,
You might look at the page history. I've already tried to speedy that page once, and it was declined. (Try prod next.) Matt (talk) 04:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- I tagged that with {{db-a7}} for lack of web pages discussing about it (below 10). I don't know how it suggests importance for its broken grammar. Maybe AfD if prod fails? Alexius08 (talk) 05:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
In appreciation
|
"Speedy" Award | |
| In grateful acknowledgment of your consistently excellent work with speedy deletions. - Dank (push to talk) 03:49, 7 June 2009 (UTC) |
Deleted GameTrailers as an External Link
Hello, I am with Spike Digital Entertainment and we covered E3 2009 Video Game Exclusives for GT TV on Spike. We recently added our video exclusives as updates to the unreleased "Alpha Protocol" video game and many other unreleased video games. Is there a reason to why you deleted this? We are NOT advertisers nor spammers. We have exclusive information on certain video games that should be communicated on Wikipedia. Please get back to me ASAP. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtfan6204 (talk • contribs) 21:13, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Edit ot Shri Page
Hi, the links that i had added were giving the vedic meaning of the word shri and were not personally contributing anything to me. Please understand that wrong interpretation is worst than no interpretation at all. wikipedia is known worldwide and hence its reach is very far. Vedic meaning of Shri has to be added on the page. but unfortunately historians do not edit or contribute to wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Citysky (talk • contribs) 06:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Chezvous
Hi kuya Alexius08,
Wish you in good health !
First timer lang ako kaya "kuya" ang title na ginamit ko sa'yo. Impressive ang ranking mo sa "wiki" ha. Iba ang Pinoy. Ako ang nag-edit ng Chezvous. Trial lang kaya palpak at first try. I need your professional help sa article file uploading. Bago lang sa Wikipedia article uploading. Inilagay ko ang article not as a promotion ng company but as a company that is known to our kababayan here in Japan that helps the rich and famous by mostly our kababayan. Pero okay lang pag di pumasa at na speed deletion.
More power and proud ako sa'yo. Fred June 11 2009 —Preceding undated comment added 15:00, 11 June 2009 (UTC).
Mackenzie Basin entry.
I'm curious. Numerous contributors have reverted the irrelevant and non-NPOV skifield stuff that user Ingolfson repeatedly inserts, yet you have auto-reverted the entry back to Ingolfson's last edit. Why? The tourist brochure "information" he insists on including in the entry isn't appropriate. I and others have suggested repeatedly that if he's so insistent upon seeing his external articles featured in Wikipedia, he should create a new entry or entries for them. Why not try that, instead of reverting the existing entry for the Mackenzie Basin back to his favoured version every time, when his favoured version weakens the existing entry?
This seems to be more about Ingolfson "not losing" an edit war than it is about maintaining an accurate and coherent entry. He has already been proven wrong on the subject repeatedly, such as his claims that there are "many" skifields in the Mackenzie Basin (there are three) and that they are all club fields (ie, non-commercial) when they are most definitely commercial. When links to the three skifield's websites were posted that proved him wrong he removed them, with the excuse that they were "spam", yet replaced them with links of his own which were actual spam!
The Mackenzie Basin entry is for the Mackenzie Basin, not the three skifields within the Mackenzie Basin; Ingolfson appears to be the only one who can't see it. 203.173.161.63 (talk) 10:57, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
1994 World Series entry
Hey, you reverted my change of Matingly retiring in 2005 to 1995. I am pretty sure I'm right, soooo... don't change it back again. 24.79.137.132 (talk) 11:00, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user subpage - it is much appreciated! :-) --bonadea contributions talk 11:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Revert
Thanks! --EEMIV (talk) 12:16, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Alexius, 86.135.10.188 did not do anything wrong, but corrected a mistake that has escaped everyone for years:
- born 1 NOV 1661 & died 11 APR 1711, the Grand Dauphin was NOT 50 when he died but 49 years old.
I corrected the text. Cordialement, Frania W. (talk) 13:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
76.117.247.55 (talk) 21:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Dank (push to talk) 15:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion Converted to PROD: Pwnboxer
Hello Alexius08, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I have changed a page you tagged (Pwnboxer) from being tagged for speedy deletion to being tagged for proposed deletion. The speedy deletion criteria are very narrow, and do not fit the page in question. Consider reviewing the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any queries, please let me know. Thanks again! decltype (talk) 12:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk Page
Thanks for correcting my talk page! I mean, I would have gotten it, but damn you were so fast I saw the talk message notice, went there and I said to myself "there's nothing here..." -- took me some time to realize what happened. --Mpdelbuono (talk) 02:35, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
The above page was created by a user who apparently created it by mistake (note the unusual title), and realized their mistake by blanking it. However, you restored the text twice. When you see a page has been blanked, please check whether it might have been intentionally blanked by the author, which sometimes happens, as opposed to being blanked by vandalism. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:25, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
The Silver Bears
Hey Alexius08,
You had put a vandalism notice on my talk page [1] regarding an edit to The Silver Bears, and as I said on my talk page [2], I don't understand why. I was merely replacing the speedy deletion tag that you had placed, but that the author removed. I'm guessing it was just a mistake, and if that is the case I would appreciate it if you could remove the vandalism notice from my page. I'm not trying to pick a fight, just keep my record clean :-). Thanks. [mad pierrot][t c] 06:44, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry for that. I also tagged that page for speedy deletion, but the user suddenly removed it. Maybe I'm doing it too fast? Alexius08 (talk) 08:31, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- No worries, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't violating some esoteric Wikipolicy. [mad pierrot][t c] 08:35, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry for that. I also tagged that page for speedy deletion, but the user suddenly removed it. Maybe I'm doing it too fast? Alexius08 (talk) 08:31, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
External link
Dear Alexius08:
Thank you for your revision and deleting the external link from the article Double Top & Double Bottom by using Huggle. It looks much better when we keep articles within the circle of WP and try to improve them. How to trade in Double Top & Double Bottom formation needs another article or another section perhaps. let me think..!Altafqadir (talk) 23:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
CSD
In the future, please do not ever edit anything within my userspace. Especially never on my subpages for future articles. Leave User:Blargh29/Center out of your Twinkle rush to tag CSDs. It is a page specifically authorised under WP:UP#SUB "A work in progress, until it is ready to be released." Geez. --Blargh29 (talk) 14:03, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Bottom line: there's been some discussion about changing the instructions at UAA to discourage people from reporting usernames on accounts that haven't edited in roughly one month, but please see my offer here. (Watching) - Dank (push to talk) 03:56, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Merges
Hi, Alexius. If you're going to propose a merge, you should create a place to discuss the proposal, preferably at the talk page of the target article. Powers T 18:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Wikibreak?
Your page says you're on a wikibreak, but you've made no less than 250 edits to Wikipedia in the past two weeks. I'd suggest that you take down your personal notice, but that's just my opinion. -- Thekohser 16:27, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Reverting
I noticed you reverted a vandal. May I suggest that you do not include the URL they are trying to promote in your edit summary. Per WP:DENY I think the best summary is just "rvv" if undo or rollback are not available. Johnuniq (talk) 10:56, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Would you care to offer feedback?
I've been working on the Tekserve page with some expressed trepidation, and I was wondering whether the sources provided seem to meet the criteria. The discussion has been strangely quiet. For this reason, I ask your opinion of the newer, as yet incomplete, version. As per companies project guidelines, the page should contain a "business model" section, so I was going to use the existing sources to build that, then expand the culture section with a paragraph on how the business has been one of the leaders in getting NYC to mandate/facilitate computer recycling. I'm not the page creator; I'm not a marketing or IT person, but am a long time editor with a conflict who has found himself in this somewhat uncomfortable position of defending interest. I hope this request is not seen as attempting to influence your nom; I just feel your google news criteria was pretty restrictive. A Google News search for "Elderly Instruments" only gets two passing mentions, and that's a featured article. If this process goes against my effort, it wouldn't be the first process to do so. BusterD (talk) 15:16, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Notice
Hi. I'm posting to let you know that your name has been mentioned on a list of Highly active users on the talk page for RfA's here. If you are interested in running for administratorship, or if you would like to make any comments, feel free to join the discussion. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 17:37, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thank you
thank you for showing me the way —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.68.2.169 (talk) 02:41, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello
Hello Alexius08, I saw you reverted a vandal edit on Kosovo Liberation Army. But the interesting thing is that you caught it within the same minute, so I have a question for you if I may ask: How are you tracking changes (member of WP:WikiProject Kosovo?) and with what do you do it (rss feeds?)? Because, man, that was fast. Thank you. kedadial 03:08, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined for S. Hari Singh
I declined your speedy deletion request for S. Hari Singh because the article does not meet WP:A7: "given immense contribution to the field of painting" is significant. Moreover, the article already had a template that said "Please help improve the article." Please, before simply templating articles, try to put yourself in the position of an editor who actually wants to follow the request and improve an article, only to find out that the article she just improved got speedily deleted. That doesn't make sense. — Sebastian 05:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Your on Notice
I find your User Page Appalling to say the least. What is up with the guy with the spear image? Awards for deleting peoples work without helping them? You helped destroy my page I have spent hours on!
I did participate in the discussion with only help from one guy! (Footnote: I noticed you like to shoot from the hip on Wiki via my research, So I will "KEEP MY COOL" on my end and hopefully you will change your ways on your end). Kevin was the only Admin guy to help on my page, I got taken out from 4 to 5 admin people going "delete" crazy like a bunch of Commandos including yourself. One Admin guy even has a Stat Graph on his User page bragging about how many pages he has deleted with no stats on pages he has built or help edit. You have "Awards" for doing so! Why is this appear to be a game for some Admin people? Quick to shoot you down to put another notch on the belt, but not quick to help build or edit a page! I am looking for help here, not to waste my time or your time. I am relentlessly looking for help! I am not on the right or on the left, I am in the center moving forward!
...."Words without Actions are the Assassins of Idealism"" POINT BLANK QUESTION! Are you going to help me with my page? Modelmanager (talk) 21:04, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- I can help you on writing it, if you could write it in a less promotional manner. Take a look at what you've written on 21 Magazine earlier:
| “ | 21 features high end casinos, resorts, spas, models, upscale industry parties, fashions, exclusive interviews of entertainers, five star culinary experiences, and the "best life has to offer." | ” |
- It sounds more promotional than informative. Had it been done with less puffery, it could have survived speedy deletion, but without expanding it, it cannot get through a deletion nomination. What about trying to research about its history, circulation, and notable contributors? It could enhance the article a bit. Just be sure to back everything you write with reputable sources that are relevant to the subject.
- Please see this article about TIME Magazine for you to have an idea what you should write and try to pattern 21 Magazine after it. Alexius08 (talk) 13:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Budania
I updated the nomination with an explanation. (Sorry it wasn't there immediately.) Perhaps, you will reconsider your Neutral position on deleting the Budania article: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Budania#Budania —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwesley78 (talk • contribs) 12:40, 23 October 2009 (UTC)