User talk:Alon9393

Welcome!

Hi Alon9393! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 06:40, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths in 2024

Hello, when you add people to the Deaths in 2024 page, please note that they should be in alphabetical order under each day. Thank you. Marbe166 (talk) 08:55, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

...and only simple citations should be used. Thank you. --Marbe166 (talk) 06:12, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder. --Marbe166 (talk) 06:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Marbe166 ok. Alon9393 (talk) 15:56, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please pay more attention when you add people. --Marbe166 (talk) 06:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Akiva (Singer)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Akiva (Singer), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid unedited machine translations

Hi, @Alon9393! Thanks for creating the article Akiva (singer), and improving my Draft:Akiva Turgeman. However, it looks like it was mostly unedited machine translation from its version on Hebrew Wikipedia.

This should generally not be done, per Help:Translation#Avoid unedited machine translations, as machine translation is usually inaccurate, especially in articles dealing with a lot of names, such as the one you edited. Especially if you do not know the language it is being translated to (I'm assuming you're not a native Igbo speaker), when you could end up with a lot of mistakes.

Regards Yeshivish613 (talk) 12:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Hannan (singer) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Abdul Hannan (singer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello Alon9393. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Abdul Hannan (singer), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Alon9393. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Alon9393|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 21:34, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that they are still doing it, such as here. Ref ^(chew)(do) 21:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:Abdul Hannan (Pakistani singer), give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Alon9393, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Alon9393|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The result of @Liz, User:Davey2010, User:Saqib was to Keep, I think you yourself want that article not to exist, the article has independent sources such as The Times of India , The Rolling Stones, Red Bull among others, the musical artist was the most listened to on Spotify in 2023 and will surely be the most listened to in 2024 in India and Pakistan You must specify what else you want in that item. Alon9393 (talk) 07:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please submit it for review? I don’t believe the article meets the WP:NSINGER yet. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be rude but which part of "Not sure why you've canvassed me here but I have no interest in this article or the person so as such have no opinion on this nomination, Thanks" did you not understand ?,

I have no interest in Abdul Hannan or any of your AFDs or the subjects you're nominating so please stop pinging me, Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 11:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Helge Rasche for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Helge Rasche is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helge Rasche until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 06:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AFDs

Hello, Alon9393,

You're still a new editor on this project. I'd like you to slow down the rapid pace of your participation in AFD deletion discussions. Sometimes, you are commening in one AFD per minute which is not enough time to thoughtfully assess an article, using Wikipedia's notability standards, and evaluate sources.

I'd like you to participate in fewer discussions but, please, go deeper. Don't just review the nomination statement and glance at the article, do a deep dive and make a careful contribution to the deletion discussion. Also comments like "not encyclopedic" are not policy-based and really tell us nothing about the notability of the subject. Right now, I'm disregarding some of your comments because it appears that no time or effort were put into your assessments. Being a thoughtful participation in deletion discussions takes a thorough knowledge of policy and an understanding of a variety of different standards for notability on Wikipedia as well as a good understanding of how to correctly assess sources. Please only participate if you can spend appropriate level of effort to carefully assess an articl and whether it is suitable for a standalone article on this project.

If you have questions about this, please bring them to the Teahouse where experienced editors can provide you with advice and a second opinion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Hello, thanks for the guidance, I will try to slow down and follow the instructions. I wanted to ask you the following question, this article Abdul Hannan (singer) can be maintained, and if an agreement is not reached as it happens, which would be done at the entrance, I see it well and with notoriety as desired. Alon9393 (talk) 05:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you're not WP:BE. Just a heads-up. Instead of moving drafts straight into the main namespace, it’s better to submit them for review first. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz sorry for the question, you just close the deletion query that I proposed and as a result of lack of consensus, which the result was to maintain because this user I don't wait for a reasonable amount of time to pass and I delete the article again, I just sent it to the draft, it's as if I didn't want the article with multiple sources and encyclopedic development, I didn't want it to exist Who makes the final decision in this case? Alon9393 (talk) 07:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Saqib were not satisfied with the deletion query, well neither was I, but in this case where @Liz analyzed and gave its resolution, it should be respected, her decision was to keep, I do not understand why you are sending it again to the draft, why don't you open a deletion query would be the most logical thing to do, but don't keep saying that the article is promotional and that it doesn't meet the standards of a musical artist, because I don't see anyone else in that position, respect the decision made. Alon9393 (talk) 07:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As long as you keep making new articles on the same topic, I'll keep sending them to drafts NS and imv, putting an article in draft is better than an AFD because it gives you a chance to fix it and get it approved. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Hannan (singer) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Abdul Hannan (singer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]