Jump to content

User talk:K.Vasilis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Alumil S.A)
Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

ALUMIL Aluminium Industry S.A.[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ALUMIL Aluminium Industry S.A., and it appears to include material copied directly from https://www.linkedin.com/company/alumil.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ALUMIL Aluminium Industry S.A.[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ALUMIL Aluminium Industry S.A. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://www.linkedin.com/company/alumil. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 09:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because this account has been used only for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is against Wikipedia's policy: an account is for an individual, not a group. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free advertising service.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:00, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

K.Vasilis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologise for what i placed in the Wikipedia page, i understand that i went against the section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion for copyright which i did not realise at the time. This was due to me foolishly not paying enough attention to the first article page which i will most definitely read carefully next time. Also i can assure you that the page will be used exclusively for encyclopedic knowledge and not for advertising and promotional purposes. I have read the policies and guidelines and henceforth i will be very careful before uploading an article. Thank you. Alumil S.A (talk) 10:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not knowing our copyright rules is an understandable mistake, passing off an obviously promotional corporate profile as an encyclopedia article is not. You will not be unblocked in order to write about your employer, so how else will you improve Wikipedia? MER-C 12:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

K.Vasilis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You judge me for an article which was copied and contained clear description and none additional elements to my employer as you mentioned, and i admitted it to you because i had not read the policies and guidelines. Also even if i agree with your answer, according to Wikipedia and article ‘’What Wikipedia is not’’, which states that information about companies and products must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery. So i think that you should be give me a chance to make it up for my mistakes and if in the future find that this page used for advertising purposes then impose me speedy deletion. Thank you.

Decline reason:

You haven't answered the question posed by MER-C. Yamla (talk) 12:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Alumil S.A (talk) 07:09, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

K.Vasilis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Recently i contacted with an administrator who helped me and explained to me my mistakes. First of all, my first mistake was that i named my user page with the name of the page that i wanted to upload (now i have changed my name and i have fixed this problem). My second mistake was that i didn't read the policies and guidelines in order to fully understand how Wikipedia operate (now i have read the rules and i am trying everyday to fix my mistakes). Regarding the question you asked me, I think it's a very general question and there is no specific answer. Nevertheless i answer you that i want to provide encyclopedic knowledge through my account like all others users and that is the main reason i'm asking you to unblock me. I recognized and i understand my mistakes, i apologies and i ask you for third time to give me a chance to make amends. Thank you

Decline reason:

You have been blocked because you kept creating promotional copyright-violating articles about your employer. These are the only edits you have ever made. You have now asked to be unblocked three times now, stating that you wish to make useful contributions to Wikipedia. Twice now, Wikipedia administrators have asked you to describe what these useful edits will be. You have flat-out refused to answer, which leads me to believe that you just want to write more about your employer. Until you demonstrate that you have some area of editing interest that is totally unrelated to the offense you have been blocked for, I think you need to stay blocked. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:K.Vasilis&oldid=1046310822"