Jump to content

User talk:Amycarson12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Amycarson12, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:30, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mildred Johnson Library (February 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 17:30, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Amycarson12! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:30, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mildred Johnson Library (February 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mildred Johnson Library (February 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Since the last "decline", this draft has been altered so that it shows an increase in the notability of the person that the library is named after. No change whatever has been made to evidence that the library is notable. This resubmission has just been a waste of reviewers' time. Please do not submit yet again without first adding description of or commentary on the library, summarized from reliable sources (which must be independent of the library).
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 03:02, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I have a high opinion of the notability (as defined by me) of university libraries. (Certainly I've spent many hours in one or other.) So I hope that your draft succeeds. But in order to do so, it must demonstrate that the place satisfies Wikipedia's notability criteria. Is there nothing substantial about it in books or periodicals of librarianship, architecture, etc., or in the ND press? -- Hoary (talk) 04:27, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. My intention (noted on the Talk page of the draft) was to add only the bare minimum of information allowable to get the draft approved. I hoped to use the "bare bones" stub article during a brief (1 hour) Wikipedia edit-a-thon during National Library Week (April 2023). Student participants would then add additional information (# of patrons the library serves, current photo, geographic coordinates, date of building dedication, name architecture firm, details of physical collection and archival collection etc.) to enhance the stub article. I do not plan to abandon the draft and will try to figure something out prior to submitting it for approval again. Amycarson12 (talk) 15:26, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mildred Johnson Library (February 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 18:57, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mildred Johnson Library has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mildred Johnson Library. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 22:27, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mildred Johnson Library has been accepted

[edit]
Mildred Johnson Library, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Amycarson12&oldid=1145050781"