User talk:Anadimukta

November 2019[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ST47 (talk) 18:48, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anadimukta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello ST47, I'm new to Wikipedia so please bare with me. I am not a sock puppet as this is my only account on Wikipedia. I volunteer in my free time for the same organization as HDHBapji and the other users that were banned in this investigation. Recently, the leader of our organization (HDH Bapji) had passed away and while browsing through Wikipedia, I came to learn that User:Sahitya.assist was working on an article about HDH Bapji. My intention was to help them as their mother tongue is not English (we live in different countries and I don't know most of them) and this was the purpose of my account's creation. I was unable to make any edits to the articles before everything got deleted (this is why I didn't get a chance to declare my COI). I did however make a comment on one of the talk pages of User_talk:Sahitya.assist to inquire about whether they required my assistance or not. My IP address (from the comment) appears as a proxy because I actually wrote that at my workplace where we use an internal network. I understand why you have banned me but, it's my request that you provide me with another chance and I would appreciate it if you could provide suggestions for avoiding such issues in the future. Thanks! --Anadimukta (talk) 00:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have essentially declared that you have indeed violated WP:MEAT. Additionally, your claim that you didn't get a chance to declare your COI is laughable. You had three months from the time you registered your account until the time you were blocked. Please tell people in your workplace to stop setting up accounts. Unless and until HDHBapji is unblocked, we don't want you working together to evade that block. Yamla (talk) 11:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anadimukta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Yamla, I respect your decision and do admit to my mistakes. Although my account was registered for 3 months, I didn't actually get around to making any edits due to a lack of time (which is also why I didn't really know about declaring COIs as I didn't research into Wikipedia policies). However, I do agree with you that it is laughable and entirely my fault. One thing I would like to clarify is that my workplace is different than the organization I volunteer at. I just want to request that you remove the IP ban (which is on my workplace's IP) as it's entirely separate from this issue and no one else from my workplace is involved in this matter. I will surely inform the other members of the organization that I volunteer at to stop creating new accounts. Either way, I will respect whatever decision you make as I have indeed violated Wikipedia policies. Thanks! --Anadimukta (talk) 16:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not really an unblock request and unblocking the IP would open the door to further problems.-- Deep fried okra 21:42, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

reply to email[edit]

In response to the following,

You recently declined my unblock request. I understand that my unblock request wasn't really an unblock request and apologise for that. However, you did mention that unblocking the IP address would cause more problems. I would appreciate it if you could elaborate a bit more on that matter.

Well, it should be obvious that it might open the door to more socking or other problematic edits. My impression was that this is related to a WP:UPE farm. I see by the block summary that this impression may have merit. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HDHBapji would have more information.-- Deep fried okra 22:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 29453[edit]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Anadimukta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #29453 was submitted on 2020-03-14 02:17:34. This review is now closed.

--Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 02:57, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]