User talk:Anadine

Welcome from Redwolf24[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.

Remember to place any articles you create into a category so we don't get orphans.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.

Redwolf24 The current date and time is 5 June 2024 T 20:16 UTC.

P.S. I like messages :-P

---

Welcome to the Wikipedia

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be bold!

User:Sam Spade

Thomas Chalmers[edit]

I put an explanation in my edit summary, but probably should have expanded on it on talk. The problem was a merging of two articles from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica. The Thomas Chalmers article, had the end of an article about George Chalmers instead of the correct ending - I suspect that the original scan missed a page. It was the sudden mention of the death of George Chalmers that showed there was a problem. I checked with a couple of versions and it's the 1911encyclopedia.org version that's wrong [1], the encyclopedia.jrank.org version is OK ([2] and [3]). So I took out the faulty ending and put the right ending in. Of course, being a 1911 article, it has all the usual language and NPOV problems. Anyway, sorry for the confusion, hopefully it's clear now -- sannse (talk) 21:25, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ako srednje dobro govoriš slovenački, pretpostavljam da mozeš da razumeš i ovo. Ako je tako, mozeš da dodaš još jedan (srpski) jezik medju impresivnu listu jezika koje govoriš :) Quot linguas calles, tot homines valles. -- Obradović Goran (ta^lk 03:18, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish Wikipedians' notice board[edit]

Since joining Wikipedia recently I have learnt an awful lot, and one of those things is the value of teamwork. It has become increasingly apparent to me that there are absolutely tons of people out there devoted to editing the Scottish articles, but we communicate only haphazardly. To begin to attempt to remedy this, I have initiated a notice board for all Scoto-fans!

You can find it using this shortcut: WP:SCOWNB (yes, I know that it ain't very "short", but our nordic neighbours had first call on WP:SWNB).

Please sign up and post notices, or at least Watch the page.--Mais oui! 15:34, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Translation[edit]

Hello! A while ago you signed up to help translate articles from other Wikipedias at Wikipedia:Translators available.

This page has since become obsolete and has been replaced by two userbox templates.

If you are still interested in translating, you may sign up again by using one of the following userboxes on your userpage (while changing, of course, the codes according to the languages you speak):

   {{Translator|es|Spanish}} 
   {{Proofreader|fr|French}}

We hope to see you soon on Wikipedia:Translation!

Help![edit]

I am Anadine and have lost my password and I really really want my old identity back. Any suggestions?

AfD nomination of Lists of people by nationality[edit]

An editor has nominated Lists of people by nationality, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of people by nationality and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Lists of Americans[edit]

I have nominated Lists of Americans, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of Americans. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —fetch ·comms 22:07, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Algerians for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Algerians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Algerians until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Selket ^Talk 23:33, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]