User talk:Ancy025

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at User admission. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Just Chilling (talk) 19:42, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Ancy025, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 12:57, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Ancy025, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ancy025! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ancy025

Hello Ancy025,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ancy025 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:45, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ancy025

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ancy025 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:06, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anurag Ved Choudhary

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anurag Ved Choudhary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — IVORK _Discuss 13:46, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User talk:Writ Keeper, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 18:33, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=I apology for my mistake,please unblock me ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 18:35, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ancy025 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18889 was submitted on Aug 01, 2017 20:02:17. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me

Ancy025 (talk) 19:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to edit article

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ancy025 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In future,I never remove any article

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ancy025 (talk) 19:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC) my talk page[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ancy025 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm professional and have to ability to share my knowledge over the article world.The editing world is passion for me and want to continue as editor for lifetime.I'm noting without article

Decline reason:

This does not show you understand the reason for the block. It does not indicate the problems wouldn't recur. Huon (talk) 19:26, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ancy025 (talk) 19:23, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Favonian

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ancy025 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood why I blocked and now understand of the policy which I were against. Because I removed some page from Wikipedia. I admit that I did something wrong and that it won't happen again. Ancy025 (talk) 19:40, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You created sock puppet Conny Wimmer for block evasion. Just Chilling (talk) 20:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I did not understand what i do because I'm block?

Ancy025 (talk) 06:20, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ancy025 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood why I blocked and now understand of the policy which I were against. Because I removed some page from Wikipedia. I admit that I did something wrong and that it won't happen again.I accept this I created multiple account but my intention was fair with it Conny Wimmer Tang Tiffany

Decline reason:

You'll need to do a better job of convincing us that you will not repeat the behavior that got you blocked before you have any chance of being unblocked. —DoRD (talk) 13:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear,Sir...

Lugnuts Can you create an article for me? Ancy025 (talk) 11:09, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've no way

Favonian Sir,You did block me.I'm unable to edit any article.Sir,please unblock me.I'm sorry Ancy025 (talk) 11:12, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

why I should be unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ancy025 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be unblocked because I've ability to write an article and also can put more details about notable person.Please consider on my ability. Ancy025 (talk) 16:47, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have failed to address the reasons for your block. There have now been enough hopeless pleas and unblock requests so I am revoking your talk page access. If you choose to appeal through UTRS you need to be aware that you are likely to be allowed few appeals so you need to make them constructive and address all points. In particular you should explain why: 1. You created a self-promotional article on a non-notable person - i.e. yourself. 2. You vandalised other users talk pages. 3. You created at least two sock puppets for block evasion. 4. What steps you are taking to improve your competence in written English. Just Chilling (talk) 18:44, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.