User talk:Andynct

Hello, Andynct, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Beagel (talk) 21:36, 26 November 2012 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of power stations in South Africa may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• za/Admin/Document/Editor/file/Consultations/Electricity/Presentations/Lesedi%20Power%20Company%20(Oakleaf%20Investments%20Holdings%2079%20(Pty)%20Ltd.pdf|accessdate=17 August 2013}}</ref>
• Document/Editor/file/Consultations/Electricity/Presentations/Khathu%20Solar%20Energy%20Facility%20(Renewable%20Energy%20Investments%20SA%20(Pty)%20Ltd.pdf|accessdate=17 August 2013}}</ref> <ref>{{

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:40, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Great work

Sorry if I seemed harsh, You're a brilliant editor, we need a thousand more like you writing about African infrastructure! Gareth E Kegg (talk) 11:18, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Ivanpah natural gas use

Great work in keeping the Production section updated! I'm a little concerned, however, about the "natural gas used" data in that section of the Ivanpah entry. As footnoted, the natural gas usage data comes from the EIA's Electricity Browser. The problem is, that data is woefully incomplete. For instance, for all three units, there is no entry for natural gas for Feb 2015 through July 2015. Obviously the plant did not suddenly begin to produce power without some natural gas; clearly this is missing data. I fear that presenting annual totals with gaping holes like this in the data gives an inaccurate impression of the plant's gas usage. Thoughts? Napapjd (talk) 22:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

• I have no idea how to fix that if the IEA figures are wrong or slow to update unless there is a better source. My intention is to at least to make it visible that Ivanpah does use gas. Have they as part of testing stopped using gas in the morning during summer? They were heavily criticized for using so much gas last year.Andynct (talk) 05:40, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Concerts @ Cape Town Stadium

Not sure why you're reverting deletions of unsourced info in the Cape Town Stadium page. You've done it multiple times, even after I've explained that adding back unsourced info is a clear violation of WP:VERIFY. In addition, the Passion Conference isn't even a concert, so even if you had a reliable source that verified its notability, it doesn't belong in the "Concerts" section. Pretty straightforward, I think. Rockypedia (talk) 16:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Two references prove the Passion event happened. The Facebook Event page corroborates it happened and that attendance was approximately 30000 from photos and organizers postings. If a better reference can be found, sure replace it. Andynct (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

I noticed you haven't addressed the problem that it wasn't a concert, and that "Passion" is not a band. Also, neither of those references is a WP:RS - not even close. If you can find significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that indicate the event's notability, feel free to create a new section for "Prayer Conferences" and add it there. Rockypedia (talk) 17:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

If you had bothered to look at the video on the events page I referenced you would see that Passion is definitely a concert. A Christian concert. Andynct (talk) 19:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

You still have the problem of not having any reliable secondary sources, and no indication of why the event is significant enough to include on the page in the first place. The first link is a primary source, and the second one is a Facebook page. Those need to be replaced by reliable secondaries or the section will be removed. Rockypedia (talk) 19:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

An event of 30000 is definitely a notable event at the stadium and both references support it. BTW Facebook can be used as a reference, although it is not recommended. I notice you are not fussed about other unreferenced material on the page. All your edits have been about removing the Passion concert. You seem obsessed. As an atheist I find you prejudice alarming and illuminating. I have under protest created a separate section for the Passion event but it does feel like I'm bringing Apartheid back. It will be moved back to the concerts section if there are complaints or if somebody else moves it. Andynct (talk) 20:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Now you're just making things up. My first edit on the concerts section (that you blanket reverted) removed all the concerts that had no sources. The other unreferenced material on the page will have to be referenced or go as well. It has nothing to do with anything religious, and whether or not you're an atheist is completely immaterial.

Also, it may be your opinion that an event that draws 30,000 is a notable event, but there's two huge problems with that - #1, there's still no reliable secondary source that states there were 30,000 people there, or that the event even happened, because both sources you provided are primary sources. While they can (probably) be accepted to establish that an event did happen, a primary source cannot be used to establish that it was a notable event, for obvious reasons. If I put on my own Facebook page that my band's concert was significant and that it drew 30,000 people, obviously that isn't acceptable on Wikipedia as a WP:RS. #2, your opinion (or mine) is not the basis for which we include or don't include material - reliable secondary sources establish that. If you can't find any, then that material has to go, eventually, along with everything else that isn't reliably sourced. If you prefer, I can remove all the other stuff first and then circle back to the Passion event, if that will assuage your fears of some anti-Christian bias. Please remember to assume good faith in the future. Rockypedia (talk) 14:28, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the Cape Town correction

It was not my intention to remove that council seat figure, I was careless during the editing process. Thanks for restoring it. -- 80.217.141.69 (talk) 20:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Lots of good detail. Wonder if it shouldn't have its own page rather, especially as the new elections will be soon.Andynct (talk) 22:10, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Andynct. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Andynct. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steenbras Hydro-Electric Lower Dam (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steenbras Hydro-Electric Lower Dam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Steenbras Hydro-Electric Lower Dam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 21:59, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Andynct! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 21:59, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andynct. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andynct. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Yoco

Hello, i created an article about Yoco, a Cape Town based company . I think it meets criteria of notabilty to be in Wikipedia. but it was unfortunately put as article for deletion. Can you please give your opinion as an experienced contributor ? Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoco Technologies Thank you in advance. MathieuPaul1977 (talk) 13:08, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Steenbras Hydro-Electric Lower Dam

Hello, Andynct. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Steenbras Hydro-Electric Lower Dam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 21:57, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)