User talk:Ankitbhatt/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Per your request[edit]

Hi. Per your request, I've undone your self-requested block. Sorry for the delay; as I said in email, I hardly ever check that email account. If you ask for a block again, please remember that any administrator will undo it if you ask at your talk page. For that matter, I'd have seen it here, as I was keeping you on my watchlist just in case. :) I didn't block your access to your talk page. :) Unless something has triggered an autoblock, you should be good to go. Please just leave a note here if you encounter any issues. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hope to see you back again. Good luck Ankit! -- Karthik Nadar 04:34, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bollywood films of 2011 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Delhi Belly
Chennai Express (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Eid
Ek Tha Tiger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Eid
Ra.One (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bodyguard (2011 film)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WTF[edit]

Did U see this? Jai (2012 film) --Meryam90 (talk) 22:31, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

To be honest, I realized how much I missed you in the gap, though I am, by no means, an SRK or Salman fan. :) Hope you forgot those people who tried screwing your work here and I wish we meet in other articles, hopefully in a much better situation. Thanks. X.One SOS 13:03, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, all's well that end's well. When's your JEE? X.One SOS 13:16, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not far, guess that's a totally new experience for you. I'll be writing that in another 2 years, wish you the best of luck! X.One SOS 13:34, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ChammakChalloCombined.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:ChammakChalloCombined.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 01:14, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi![edit]

Hey dude, did u noticed me in Wikipedia Fundraising appeal? -- Karthik Nadar 13:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How was it?? :D -- Karthik Nadar 13:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Jackpot! Lols, I never knew-ed it would be like that! -- Karthik Nadar 13:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ya I'm a part-timer, that from wheres I contribute maximum. My edits in my home will be the ones after 11pm. Wishing you belated New Year and Pongal. -- Karthik Nadar 13:59, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I work till 9 and reach home and all, with free after 11. I don't stay in Bandra, but I spend more than 12hrs in a day in Babdra :D. -- Karthik Nadar 14:12, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ya, that was really an attempt to make you jealous :D. Flat rates in Bandra are always at peak, so wont ever prefer leaving living there. -- Karthik Nadar 14:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lols! ROFL! You need to read that line thinking that I am a Guy, and not an actress, to promote herself! -- Karthik Nadar 14:50, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ankit, the gross for Don 2 is given as 205 crore, but the source clearly says it is just an expected figure. Please remove it or add a note saying "expected worldwide gross" in small font next to it. Thanks. X.One SOS 07:53, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I didn't mean to say you did it, but just requested you to remove it or modify it accordingly, as I have totally stopped editing certain SRK articles, due to the presence of certain bad elements which attack only certain users. Regards. X.One SOS 09:10, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of accolades received by Ra.One for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of accolades received by Ra.One is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of accolades received by Ra.One until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:32, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of accolades received by Ra.One[edit]

Hi Ankit. The article is good, and has a good chance of becoming an FL with a bit more effort, but based on my deeper look, the sources given for the Apsara awards seem totally unreliable, especially that indiawest.com, which says in its TOU that "indiawest.com will use reasonable efforts to include up-to-date and accurate information in this Internet site, but makes no representations, warranties, or assurances as to the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information provided." I have come across a few sites, which were judged unreliable because of such a disclaimer. I managed to replace the pinkvilla source for Stardust awards, but the Apsara awards are not mentioned in any RS's I could find, like this, this and this. They only mention the music awards, and I'm afraid the reviewer will not pass the article if such sources exist. Please replace the sources if you feel the same, or you can ask at WP:RSN. Regards. X.One SOS 08:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TALK to Ashermadan? You gotta be kidding me. ;) Obviously they are unreliable, so I removed and tagged it. X.One SOS 09:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind, the sources have been provided. Sometimes, shit happens. X.One SOS 11:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Om Shanti Om awards section[edit]

I have a serious problem with the awards section of Om Shanti Om because it only states the wins and not the nominations which is seriously wrong, even the tables in which those wins are stated piss me off...:/ I am gonna have to turn it into a simple list. --Meryam90 (talk) 15:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of accolades received by Ra.One (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Action
Lootera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Romance
Son Of Sardar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Romance

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Becoming Admin[edit]

Hey, I was wondering how one becomes an admin. The Don 2 page is out of date. I told X.One to edit it but he didn't. The awards list it outdated and it has some factual errors. (Asher Madan) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashermadan (talk • contribs) 15:25, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sharukh Khan[edit]

Hi, Please have a look here and provide your comments. --HereToSaveWiki (talk) 07:40, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A very bad idea.[edit]

I appreciate you may have been annoyed, but seriously, did you think this edit was a good idea? People usually come to AN/I to get admin assistance, not to draw admin attention to themselves.

In short: *no-one* can be ordered by anyone to anywhere in Wikipedia, not even by arbitrators to an Arbcom case. Do NOT do it again. Manning (talk) 11:18, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just saying that I concur with Manning's comments above. Your posting of an "official notice" was entirely inappropriate, and gave the impression that you were in some way empowered to act on behalf of Wikipedia - which you are not. Acting in this way is completely inappropriate and only weakens the case you have brought to WP:ANI. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 11:56, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Let me add my "third" to this: suggestion that someone has a uncoming "trial", etc is extremely uncivil, and completely contrary to the collegial nature of this project. If you have SPI beliefs, file it and shut up. Don't threaten, state that you're going to run them off the project, etc. I'm appalled at your actions towards the editor, whether or not they're a "sock" (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:38, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Did you see this?[edit]

Duuuude, why are you shocked? Scieberking, X-One, Bollywood Dreamz...and the list goes on and on, they're full fledged SRK haters...did U check my page ya? This: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Meryam90#Stuff_I_like_here ?!! There is even MORE stuff on some talk pages! Don't be shocked again :D --Meryam90 (talk) 18:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon me, Ankit but I thought it was quite obvious that I was sarcastic with Seeta Maaya, and not applauding her. I know how destructive she was to Wiki. I believe you people could over-rule her and bring things to control. That's it. Nothing more, and I meant to show absolutely no grudge on you, I am not an SRK-hater or any sort. I just do not like the attitude some SRK fans show to a few people, of whom I am a part. And, if it were the same case, even I could say stuff like "You are supporting Ashermadan, of all people" (one of the main trollers). You have seen what kind of a victim I am in these articles, with all sorts of metaphors and personal attacks directed at me. If you still do not feel convinced, then we must go our own ways, once and for all. Regards. X.One SOS 13:26, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have not stated that you have a grudge against me. I know that there is no reason for that. Over-rule SM, with the unmatched support of Scieberking? You have got to be joking. And now he has found a new troll to mentor. Clarify as to exactly which "SRK fans" have targeted you or attacked you. If you are referring to Ashermadan, let me bring it to your attention that I have never supported his way of speaking, especially the "fanboy" and "go cry to your idol" sort of stuff; if you wish to believe that I do, then I am in no position to help. Your, pardon me, stupendously hilarious comments on the Talk:Shahrukh Khan page, however, beg to differ from your statement that you are not a hater. I have already made it known as to exactly which statement(s) of yours are pretty conflicting with your declaration (especially on the unforgivable George Bush issue). You may have been targeted by people like Ashermadan, but clearly you have failed to see the sort of attacking going on against some SRK-related editors, not the least of which include "paid editors", dramebaaz, etc. I could go on and on, but that's not the point. This matter about neutrality will never subside, especially if some agenda-based trolls are continuously encouraged to add trash into articles. I meant no personal insult or any such thing, but you have to understand the sort of tension-filled atmosphere in Bollywood-related articles. The last time I asked an editor to explain his double-standards, he coolly gave a lecture and ignored all sorts of rather obvious evidence of his non-neutrality. I hope you do not take to that path, and can satisfactorily assuage me of any doubts. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then, shall I take it that the issue is resolved? Every person has their own point of view, and the reaction you get depends on how you take it or, how Wp takes it. X.One SOS 13:58, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you say so. Do you have any idea on what kind of attitude some of your "friends" have? No pinpointing, just the hint for you to decipher. I believe I came to Wp primarily to edit film articles, but I always love changing the genre. Your wish, to decide. X.One SOS 14:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind, what about geography? Chennai and Kolkata are in a really bad state and undergoing FA re-assesments right now. X.One SOS 14:25, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, then Science? Of course, you are a to-be IIT'an. And, I'll be continuing in FIITJEE for the next 2 years. :-) X.One SOS 14:32, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Rarely do people refer to me as "yaar", especially here in Chennai but, I am in fiitjee, joined a couple of years back, quite good and encouraging. X.One SOS 14:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I know that, most of em are North Indians. Which branch are you referring to? I'm in Adyar, and in 10th right now not 11th. X.One SOS 14:44, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Integrated? Now that's what I called a bore. I do not wish to reveal further details, forgive me, for I love my secrecy. Some of the faculty are annoying but most of them are good. Whenever you say Kilpauk, you are bound to get people teasing you about the .... Adyar is well, better if not the best. X.One SOS 14:51, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Sometimes silence is golden. What say you about the course? X.One SOS 15:05, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ankitbhatt, this round of accusations and personal attacks is now getting outright nasty. I don't feel like writing here, neither I'm here to explain anything. And I don't want to take it to the next level by reporting it to some noticeboard (that may lead to another "wiki-break" or, in any case, breed ill will). If we can't be friends, let's just not discuss each other and "live and let live". Thank you very much. Adios. Scieberking (talk) 16:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, such a waste of time, energy and space to dig out from under the session histories and mention, but it's not impossible to read the praises I've written about you on nearly half a dozen pages. I still apologize if I've hurted anyone. Regarding trolls, I only encouraged new users to become good and unbiased Wikipedians. That's my final comment. Thanks. By the way, who is SM? Scieberking (talk) 17:52, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote this on Seeta's page: "I wish AnkitBhatt was here, because he was a great editor and understood policies and guidelines very well. He really kept things going and didn't let anything slow down". Okay, it is quite clear from your tone that you don't want to straighten out. So good day. Scieberking (talk) 18:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If I remember correctly you ppl discuss US freely, (my page is proof of it). You can't complain if we do the same. Anyway, I've tried hard to even stay out of the SRK talk page dispute and some ppl couldn't get over themselves still. --Meryam90 (talk) 17:27, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think its time we close this topic; enough of eye-washing has been done. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 18:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don 2[edit]

its nice to see u agian anik.....i want to say u about the topic of Don 2..there is no update in the box office report..if u can update this thanks..(Cute754 (talk) 00:38, 4 February 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Reference Formatting[edit]

Hey, I updated the Don 2 page after the crazy embargo but can you help me out with formatting the references? Like how to properly put them? Asher Madan 16:26, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Bodyguard Worldwide Gross[edit]

Scieberking is vandalizing the Bodyguard 2011 page. He is changing it to 253 crores when we still use BOI for HINDI ONLY films. Help me stop him. He has gone crazy with the mad-for-Salman disease. Asher Madan 00:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Multiple Incidents of Vandalism[edit]

I have warned him twice now and he still is not stopping. He has reverted edits twice. Once by some other person and once by me. I explained what you said to him but he is not stopping. Please advise. What should I do? Asher Madan 06:35, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Is there a restriction to use BOI only unless BOI does not provide the data? Asher Madan 06:36, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Ok, he is not stopping. Now even Kartik has joined in. What do we do? This is just ridiuclous. Asher Madan 07:24, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

The link Sperking is using is old from CNN. A new CNN article from December 19 2011 said that Ra.One was at 240 and Bodyguard at 229. Can we use this information against these ridiculous actions? Asher Madan 07:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Ankit, I'll look into the matter soon, and thanks for keeping a cool. X.One SOS 07:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Is XONE biased or neutral? He does not seem to think BOI can be used in my opinion... Zubeidaaslam786 (talk) 09:54, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
XONE is has made vulgar and rude statements about Shahrukh Khan and Ra.One on his private talk page. He and the other person are teaming up. I have read all of it. They have insulted you, Ashermadan and someone named Meryam90 too. Zubeidaaslam786 (talk) 10:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies Ankit, but what do you mean by this? X.One SOS 10:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

West Bengal[edit]

I just read your comment in Kolkata. Yes we have to start working on West Bengal article, too. It would be great to have as many interested editors as possible. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:44, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, the archiving. The talk page accumulated talks for the past four years almost, as I was very inactive in wikipedia, and hardly had the energy to archiving (for some unknown reason I did not install auto-archiving either!). Recently, there were almost 350-400 talk threads!! I just started the archiving, and finally it looks somewhat better. Will do further :)
Yes, will probably ask editors in India noticeboard to come and help in WB article. Regards,--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:11, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re[edit]

You are the one jumping to conclusions, not me. X.One SOS 14:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

10th IIFA Awards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to KK, Dostana and Race (film)
Gauri Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Punjab

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please ask for protection of the Don 2 page[edit]

Can we make it semi protected? Can you please do that? Ashermadan (talk) 17:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Box Office India[edit]

Just wondering... What is the status of the website Box Office India now? Is it considered as a reliable source? In the past, it was difficult to use, and was not sure what was its status. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 02:28, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On West Bengal[edit]

Thanks for the work-list in the talk page. We need to go slow, but steady! First, we need to upgrade and update references. I have started doing that gradually. Please have a look at Economy of West Bengal, that article has been improved and increased in size, with updated references. Plan is to bring a summary from that article to the Economy section here within a few days. We can go similarly for other sections.

I requested DanaBoomer for a few days leeway, as we are still busy saving Kolkata in FARC. We do not ned to go for an FARC of West Bengal right now if we can slowly yet steadily work on the article. The plan, as discussed above, would be to first update, upgrade, rectify references (if there is some glaring copyedit issue that comes to attention in the process, we can fix that too). After a stable and updated referencing, copyediting would be the issue, for which we will need the help of other editoes with nice English writing capacity. We shall request them later. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ra.One[edit]

ARG, U're about right however, I just can't let those kind of ppl barge in and act like they own it or something just because they happen to hate SRK! As for the admin, he's not part of the gang, he just happens to be an old editors of Indian related articles and guess they're kinda friends, he's a friend of mine as well...so he's cool! :D Plus, seriously, How the HELL are we gonna get Ra.One to FA if these is constant edit wars?!! I am worried :S--Meryam90 (talk) 18:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One Question[edit]

H r u?? its zee..i have a question to ask...i have taken picture of salman khan at the set of Ek tha tiger during shooting in cuba....and of Katrina also..can i upload this photo and put it in the article of Ek tha tiger..Thanks Cute754 (talk) 17:30, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ankitbhatt. You have new messages at Talk:Bodyguard (2011 Hindi film).
Message added 07:10, 14 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

X.One SOS 07:10, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Influencing[edit]

Do you have an email id Ankit? X.One SOS 07:43, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please send me a blank mail. You can find my address in the menu at the top of my talk page and user page. X.One SOS 07:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Check urs plz. X.One SOS 08:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dhoom 2[edit]

I will see what I can do. That was my first GA, and I hadn't done as much work on it as on the later ones. Much of that stuff was already there, and I just cleaned it up. You are of course free to modify it too, I don't own it. I will however try to address your points. BollyJeff || talk 17:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I fixed it up some; have a look now. I think it is kind of tedious to use INRConvert template for EVERY figure, as it takes up a lot of space, but I used it everywhere except on the smaller (<1 crore) figures. Maybe you can help me on those national box office figures and records; I can't find anything else useful on BOI. BollyJeff || talk 23:22, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with all of your changes.

  • You removed all that small market information, and did not replace it with anything else.
  • You put quotes around some text that was not a direct quote.
  • You put xth and yth highest grossing film info, that will be out-dated soon, since every new movie these days is breaking records.

I hope you see fit to correct some of this, but if not I will let it go. Thanks for the heads up on the problems. BollyJeff || talk 12:44, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't think we need all those first day, week, month, etc. figures, unless they were notable records.
  • You don't have to have quotes for every review. In fact, we got dinged for having too many doing it once; that's why I paraphrased on some of them.
  • You can say "top 10", "top 20" etc, and it wont get out-of-date so often. BollyJeff || talk 13:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Newer films have tons of reviews online, so people tend to put too many. But I was told by a reviewer on another article to only put a couple of quotes, not one for every review. For the older films (that I like to work on) it's tough finding ANY reviews. I don't know that you really need consensus to put "top 10 grossing", but if you want to try, please do. BollyJeff || talk 13:57, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't mean that D2 had too many reviews; I was talking about articles like Ra.One. I just had a look and was overwhelmed by it all. I don't even feel like reading them. BTW, quotes are often copyrighted. See Wikipedia:Quotations. Oh, and you should not say the article is incomplete without opening day totals. Wikipedia:MOSFILM#Box_office says that it may be included, not that it must be. Check out the meager BO section of FA article Lage Raho Munna Bhai. Haha, it does have a big critical section with lots of quotes though. BollyJeff || talk 14:57, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed some of the mess in LRMB. You know, all of our GAs and FAs require periodic inspection and maintenance! BollyJeff || talk 16:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

VFX[edit]

Well RCE VFX updated their website and they have uploaded a gallery of before/after pictures of some shots from the film. I thought that maybe we can use one of them in the VFX section in Ra.One. what do you think? --Meryam90 (talk) 19:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Join the Community![edit]

Hi Ankit,

Do consider joining the WikiProject India Mailing List (https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-en) which provides communication for the community.

You may also like to add WP:INB to your watchlist.

Be sure to update yourself at Geographical distribution of Indian Wikipedians.

AshLin (talk) 16:38, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to create a user account for the site to edit the page as it is not a Wikimedia Foundation site & the global login does not work. AshLin (talk) 19:02, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Canadian Motion Picture Park[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Canadian Motion Picture Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nat Gertler (talk) 17:43, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Millennium Park Bus Depot[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ankitbhatt. You have new messages at Calvin999's talk page.
Message added 17:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Aaron • You Da One 13:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Millennium Park Bus Depot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Akshardham Temple, RTI, Public Works Department and Nizamuddin
Vicky Donor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Romance and John Abraham
Ra.One (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Stardust

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:26, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomiation of Vicky Donor[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Vicky Donor at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --SupernovaExplosion Talk 09:21, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requests/complaints[edit]

I think my deletion of the lines are quite justifiable and I assure you that there is no bad intention regarding this, but if you don't agree with me than there it is. RaOne-pageWhat I can assume is that you are sensible enough not to put every quote and series of operations printed/published in newspapers. It will simply not going to serve the purpose- no one is interested in line by line story, if they are than surely they need to refer more detailed versions-and it simply increasing the magnitude of the data only, nothing else. I agree that there might be issues you specified but I am reiterating that there is no such thing.Jpmeena (talk) 17:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you think so, then I wish you are right. Anyways you are senior user than me, your suggestions are welcomed. Jpmeena (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of highest-grossing Bollywood films (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Musical, Multiplex, Kismet and Golmaal
Chernobyl Diaries (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Horror

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Malaysia, South Korea (main), Taiwan (main), Morocco (:P), Germany (main)? X.One SOS 10:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As much as I’d like that to be true...Bollywood films don’t release in Morocco :p --Meryam90 (talk) 11:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Germany can be converted to blue. For the past 10 years or so, important films release there. X.One SOS 11:08, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And, could you comment on this Afd? X.One SOS 11:19, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And, Enthiran did earn 250c, according to BOI. Look at the article. The producers said it went beyond 400c, but as usual you know how corrupted DMK related people are. :P X.One SOS 13:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sun Pictures said that via TOI in an interview. And I had a similar feeling about 3 Idiots a couple of years back. But obviously, if Aamir can't, who can?! Same applies for Rajini. X.One SOS 14:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Enthiran suffered losses? :o Amazing. That's why Rajni shifted his focus to Eros, for his upcoming projects. X.One SOS 14:45, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps. But still I am not really sure with the 250c figure either. How on earth could BOI get figures for Tamil and Telugu versions if it cannot do so for dubbed versions? Nonsensical, ain't it? X.One SOS 15:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re[edit]

LOL believe it or not, I am not the most avid BW fan out there...I have a very very carefully selected list of films and actors I watch in BW :p and I have a private theater...so doesn't really matter if cinemas don't screen BW films here...I hardly go to cinemas anyway :P --Meryam90 (talk) 13:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ankitbhatt. You have new messages at Talk:Don 2/GA1.
Message added 10:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Have started the Review Process. You can comment in Problem sections and if you do find any other issues please state them on Talk:Don 2 and not in GA Review ASHUIND 10:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You just had to do it and insult the GA reviewer? you're unbelievable man! Truly. This obssession regarding accurate Box office gross should stop or you guys should make a Rfc or something to solve it once and for ALL. Because it is really getting UNHEALTHY! I mean how much could have the dubbed version contributed anyway? 10 cr? 15?! It's getting absurd the whole Hindi or not Hindi worldwide gross.--Meryam90 (talk) 20:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Chammak Challo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:SKYP.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:SKYP.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Ra.One[edit]

Isn't a table needed for overseas reviews, just like the Indian ones? Uniformity gets disrupted, otherwise. X.One SOS 15:22, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A few problems do exist in the article. One, images and quote boxes should not disrupt the format of the text. That is a rather annoying thing, pardon me. What I mean to say that images or quote boxes should cover exactly a certain number of paragraphs, and not in an incomplete manner. It should cover one or two paragraphs EXACTLY and not one and a half. Second, regarding the file used in the VFX section, it does not have a proper rationale. It is a non-free screenshot whose copyright is owned by the distributor. Non-free images cannot be remixed or modified in ANY way. However, it confesses that it is a part of the screenshot and not the whole, as it is. I think we need to get a better image and remove this. X.One SOS 15:40, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I think so. I'll have to nominate it for deletion. I'll see exactly what criteria it fails. X.One SOS 15:45, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know either. I thought it failed the NFCC rules but Wikipedia:NFCC#3 says that images can be used as a portion. Its getting confusing. Perhaps, I should ask at the Media copyright questions page. X.One SOS 15:54, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'll look through the archives, but unless it comes up at FAC, let's not put much attention to it. In the meanwhile, I think it would be better to keep an alternative aside. X.One SOS 16:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that would be nice. The two images, one showing the effect and another the original setup. Many Hollywood articles have that. And it looks better now that the multiple tables have been removed. However, some proper look is needed. :P X.One SOS 16:13, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have undid those two. Lets use it as a test edit in the sandbox. X.One SOS 16:26, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Rediff and DNA India look messy. What say that we use the average ratings for both, 2 and 3.25 respectively? X.One SOS 16:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And before I forget, if images are from Bollywood Hungama, their source urls must be updated as they are likely to be dead. X.One SOS 16:47, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOL... no bud I wasn't addressing you. I was just thanking Secret of success for his kind gesture. Anyways, how are things with you? The reason why I was MIA was due to my busy schedule and unfortunately this is going to continue for a while. -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 16:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck on your exams. I'm sure you're gonna ace them! :) -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 17:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is this really needed? User ratings need not necessarily be reliable. X.One SOS 11:01, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at WP:RS/IMDB. I believe there's no need for a discussion, actually. X.One SOS 13:07, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, a copy-edit is required in the lead section and the article can be renominated for GA. X.One SOS 13:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If possible, the second para needs a complete re-write. X.One SOS 13:31, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, they should be added because it was an important part of the article. But still the controversy need not be specifically mentioned. Something like "The film released after a controversial pre-release period" or similar. The cameo needs a mention. X.One SOS 13:34, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And, don't you think Ra.One needs a "themes" section? Or have they been mixed with the other sections? X.One SOS 13:36, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:FILM#Themes might help. Look at FA's like American Beauty, one of the best articles on film in Wikipedia. X.One SOS 13:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
But still, superheroes are new to Indian cinema right? And, all the geeky stuff about it. Plus the mixture of desi Bollywood and Hollywood, and all that. If it is present in other sections, no need for it. X.One SOS 14:00, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think all sections are necessary. American Beauty does not even have a BO section!! Btw, I was curious to know, which are your favourite films? X.One SOS 14:11, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pardon me, I hate Steven Spielberg, a guy who copied Indian films and later denied it. I am surprised, you watch Tamil films? That too Suriya's? :o Well, my favorites include Dabangg, Lagaan, 3 Idiots, the only two SRK films I like : KHNH and DDLJ. Down South, Unnaipol Oruvan and Roja. Hollywood, TRON: legacy and Inception and Kung Fu Panda 1 & 2. My favorite actor is Kamal Haasan and director Mani Ratnam. X.One SOS 14:56, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
But, still I am not that crazy about Hollywood films, though. X.One SOS 15:05, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind, that barely matters here. Regarding Ra.One, lets see if it is brought up at FAC, otherwise don't bother. I'd still recommend a basic copy-edit for Don 2 before its GA. X.One SOS 15:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I shall not edit the article as I am planning to review it. All my unofficial feedback can be found in the "comments" section. See if all those have been addressed (I think Meryam did it). X.One SOS 15:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, the article does not fail GA because of that. Its the age of machines, where all man needs to do is put up a simple effort in making it and then he lazes around and becomes fat. Ah, why don't people appreciate and implement hard work these days? I have formatted around 100 references in each of ZNMD and Dabangg before GA. That doesn't matter now. X.One SOS 15:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's no hurry at all. Like I said, lack of authors in references does not fail the article's GA by any means. It was just a step to try and make the article flawless. X.One SOS 16:08, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And, yes, even I am filled with board exams this week till 12th. Then 3 months hols. X.One SOS 16:09, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The royal system of CCE is the answer to everything. Seriously, we live like kings in school. Too bad, no more late-at-night slogging. Lesser chance of IIT qualification. That's why I enrolled in FIITJEE. Anyway, good night! I need to get some sleep. X.One SOS 16:29, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you look into the budget concern I raised for Ra.One? X.One SOS 08:00, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ya, its there in the peer review, under the "general" section. X.One SOS 08:32, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How can a soundtrack become a commercial success? X.One SOS 10:12, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'll get back to that soon. Busy removing Indic scripts from articles. X.One SOS 10:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ankitbhatt. You have new messages at Talk:Don 2.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

X.One SOS 10:53, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

John Carter (film)[edit]

Thanks for your message. I have to sign off now & go to work. If he does it again (delete without verification) you can report him for vandalism to WP:AIV - there an administrator will check the edits & make a decision about blocking, etc. Hope this is of some help. Regards. Denisarona (talk) 16:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC) (P.S. he should have been warned about the previous edits - admins really want to see 4 warnings for persistant vandalism). Denisarona (talk) 16:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know the outcome - glad I was of some help. Best Wishes. Denisarona (talk) 08:52, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

London Ishq[edit]

Ankit, this is to inform you that once a poster is released for the film, the first look should be deleted. Thanks. Secret of success (talk) 11:44, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving[edit]

Sorry, its just that four one-liners with a bold signature look a bit odd. I just removed all the customization of my signature. Secret of success (talk) 08:50, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ankit, do you think you could lend a hand here with the quote thingy? Or shall I do it myself and later if controversial, sort it out? I think that's a major problem with the article. Something certainly needs to be done. Secret of success (talk) 09:11, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you discuss it? That will prove to be better. Secret of success (talk) 10:23, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think this was really needed? Khan lost weight, fine. But he could not eat or drink? Secret of success (talk) 04:54, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I suggest removing the whole thing together. It does not really seem important, does it? Secret of success (talk) 05:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Ra.One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rockstar (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 Contest[edit]

Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

ssriram_mt (talk) & AshLin (talk) (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. 01:05, 12 March 2012 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 01:05, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Ra.One[edit]

Ankit, for one thing, I'm glad you are sincere enough in actually pointing out flaws. Some wouldn't really bother to do it, and leave it all to those who oppose its FA or its PR. Second, I removed the rating of LA times, because the review does not have it. Metacritic's observations sound like their own works, nothing more. Why is Gulf news in "India"? It is published from Dubai, right, and that is certainly out of India. Gulf News also follows the same story. I removed it. Secret of success (talk) 09:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many FA's do not have a BO table. I don't think its needed. Plus the trouble we've gone through, it isn't really worth it. Did anyone ask you to add it or something? Secret of success (talk) 10:07, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A summary is really not needed. The worldwide gross is mentioned in the infobox, others in BO section. What more is needed? If at all the reader is interested, (s)he will have to take the trouble of going through the BO section and find out. The table and the messing up is well, a barrier for the article's layout. Btw, today's my first WikiBirthday. :D Secret of success (talk) 10:29, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, thanks, and congrats for crossing 500 edits in Ra.One. The largest contributor, yes! And regarding the table, you were the one who misunderstood me, I'm afraid. I never hinted anything about copyright violations, I just said that the layout of the section looks $%@*!# when that table is inserted, :P sorry. But that's how it is. Either we need to properly organize it and choose the right colors, without affecting layout one bit, or remove it. Secret of success (talk) 17:03, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry Ankit, but I'm not happy with the images inserted into the article. The one in the cast section and the London shooting thing are utterly not needed. The article already has six images, adding two, makes 8! Was that much needed? The article having so many images is by no means boosting its chances of FA. Not only that, some are small, some are big, totally uneven. Bad layout. Please understand, and no offence meant. Regards, Secret of success (talk) 17:09, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ankit, you didn't get my point. Those images are not needed at all. Why did you insert it in the first place if you knew it would disrupt format and look silly? Like I said, we are over-doing it. Those images will not boost the article's FA. Secret of success (talk) 09:39, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then I'll be clear. The photo is small, the other photo was also made small for uniformity. If this is removed, then the other photo can be brought back to normal size, and it will be fine. Secret of success (talk) 10:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm ok with the paragraph thing for the release photo and the president one, but not for the new one. No, there is no such rule, but no rule which specifies the number of images. It is IMO, (optional). Frankly, let me ask. Did you feel that the original six images were not enough for the article? Secret of success (talk) 10:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I know that. I even undid an edit by an user who moved the page. Just that I was lazy to type the whole thing. Oh, and my hols have begun too, spanning over a period of 3 months!!!! Feeling jealous? :P Feel like having all the time in the world in my hands. :-) Secret of success (talk) 05:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, hope Teri Meri cheers you up lol. Even I listen to it when I am sad. Secret of success (talk) 07:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sheila Ki Jawani, good, but Chammak Challo?? Uh....I never really fancied that song much. Neither SRK'ish nor the Akon-kind. :P Maybe even others like Chikni Chameli will do, right? Secret of success (talk) 07:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lol..there have been times when I thought that Chammak Challo was an item number. :P Secret of success (talk) 08:29, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not really. Ra.One's numbers come from IANS (check the source), not from the producers. It means IANS took data from the producers but reported it without attribution, meaning they endorse it. LOL, and why are you continuously accusing Scieberking? You'd be blocked sooner or later for doing so. Secret of success (talk) 15:39, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If he talks behind your back, it does not mean you should do the same. Please go through WP:DFFWF. It makes your status no different from that of his. And I must say that generic comments are useless, please provide links or diffs where he has accused you, if you feel he has done so. Otherwise, I'm afraid your efforts will become futile. Regarding the source, I'm afraid you failed to understand the "endorsing" part, the points made by me, Lynch and Scieberking. Please go through that. Regards, Secret of success (talk) 06:03, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In case you didn't know, that is taken as a bad faith accusation, and I hold an authority equal to that of any other normal editor in Wikipedia. If you don't provide diffs, you weaken your argument. This behaviour will be valid in other noticeboards as well, for your information.
And let me remind you that voting is not appropriate. If you cannot provide a reason, your opinion cannot be taken into account. Regards, Secret of success (talk) 08:10, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ankit, as agreed on Secret of success' talk page and on the article talk page, I fail to see the Ra.One gross removed from Infobox. I am sorry to say that I believed you will keep up your words. For now I've added the Bodyguard's gross back and will keep adding it since the consensus was to remove the figure in all the three articles and not just one. Hope you understand. --HereToSaveWiki (talk) 09:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ankitbhatt. You have new messages at Secret of success's talk page.
Message added 11:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Secret of success (talk) 11:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Ra.One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you![edit]

Hi, nice to see you begin assessing. This should sustain you!

AshLin (talk) 14:41, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are most welcome :). AshLin (talk) 14:44, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tag and Assess 2012[edit]

Hi Ankit, Thanks a lot for being part of Tag & Assess 2012. Please mark importance on the subprojects as well(ex. Talk:Nagore Durgha - tn importance is missing). Ssriram mt (talk) 22:42, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Untitled Tom Cruise Project[edit]

Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:29, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ankitbhatt. You have new messages at Meryam90's talk page.
Message added 16:03, 28 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Secret of success (talk) 16:03, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to the edit-warring section. Secret of success (talk) 16:28, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chak De India...[edit]

I hear from Meryam90 that you are a genius. :-) I'm trying to round up people to push Chak De India to FAC. I pushed it to GA in 2009 -- it needed some amount of clean up which a few of us have done but we need a lot more. See my talk page for the discussion. Cheers -Classicfilms (talk) 22:28, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ankitbhatt. You have new messages at Classicfilms's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Again

Hello, Ankitbhatt. You have new messages at Classicfilms's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2012 BRICS summit[edit]

theres a discussion on the language addition on the talk page.Lihaas (talk) 09:52, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Ankitbhatt, the story was already posted on ITN by the time I saw your message. Good job ! Chocolate Horlicks (talk) 02:43, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hopefully the issue is reslved now/soon. I added your text with the "fourth" part and fact tagged per you said the hindi media i s using it. With that ref we should close this discussion i guess?Lihaas (talk) 08:45, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Could you add amrica's reaction to the respective section? per this source that mentions in the title the amrican reaction was positiveLihaas (talk) 09:21, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I have replied to your request at the lab. NikNaks talk - gallery 10:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ra.One[edit]

Hey Ankit, I remember once we had reached a consensus for italicizing only the newspapers like Hindustan Times, The Times of India, and not websites like Sify and CNN-IBN. So why they are italicized now? -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 10:29, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 BRICS summit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dharamshala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Highest-grossing Bollywood films[edit]

Yes, I know all about the troubles. The problem with this particular list is that without at least one reference, "creative extension" looks like "original research". If you could at least add a line or two about how the list was developed it would help. Same goes for the 'throughout history' list. I thought there actually was a page like this at BOI, but I have trouble finding anything there. One more thing, I was surprised not to find Krrish on this list, as some sources say it was a record breaker. Do you know anything about that? BollyJeff || talk 13:17, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For example, how do you know that Race is the biggest grosser in any March ever? How do you know that Dhoom 2 was the next film to break the record after Gadar: Ek Prem Katha? Weren't there several other blockbuster films in 2006 that could have broken the record before Dhoom 2 did? BollyJeff || talk 13:59, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, please add the description. So it is possible that Krrish was higher than Gadar, but then was replaced by Dhoom 2 in the same year, right? If so, you could say Krrish held the record for 5 months or whatever, but if that is against convention its okay. It was in the Krrish article, but I removed it for lack of a source. BollyJeff || talk 14:28, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Explain one more thing to me then. When is it appropriate to use 'gross' vs. 'nett gross'? I see one of the other used a various times in different articles. I would like us to be consistent, if possible. BollyJeff || talk 14:31, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please have a look at Krrish#Box_Office for me. Some sources must be referring to gross, not nett for the numbers to be so high; or they are just wrong. BollyJeff || talk 14:33, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That list is outdated compared to the one I referenced above. However, it does say that Krrish had a record opening for the time, which should be mentioned. Thanks. BollyJeff || talk 14:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Are you saying that the infobox should have gross and most other figures should have net? According to that list of top first weeks, the Krrish record is for the gross of 41, not the net of 29. See two films below it have net of 30. In that case I think the gross figure should be used. Yes, I am very confused. :P I tried to fix up the article with the source you provided. BollyJeff || talk 15:16, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And another confusing thing; BOI ranks them in different order on different lists. If you rank them as on the list, and then put the net, some will appear to be out of order. On this list they are not ranked by gross or net, but by distributor share. Arghhhh! I was trying to fix Bollywood films of 2006, but the order will change depending on which figure is used. Right now there are some pretty random number in there. BollyJeff || talk

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for the barnstar! I appreciate. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 12:13, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ankitbhatt. You have new messages at Redtigerxyz's talk page.
Message added 15:33, 7 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Redtigerxyz Talk 15:33, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ra.One Ghanta and Kela Awards[edit]

Since when have we started adding some random awards shows for negative awards in a page for a film? What the heck are the ghanta and kela awards? what you're doing will not make this article into a featured article at all. Ashermadan (talk) 06:29, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar :)[edit]

Glad you found the tool useful :) YuviPanda (talk) 22:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tag and Assess 2012[edit]

Hi, with contributors like you, Tag and Assess 2012 has reached mid stage. To speed up the activities, certain special awards have been announced. User:Yuvipanda has created an excellent tool to help editors who are assessing manually. The tool is under Beta release and I request you to please install, use it and give him feedback. Please see the details in https://docs.google.com/document/d/176bySLlr-fRcMYw-h4k-btL5x08qegY7Ipj2DQLHdQE/edit?pli=1. Thanks again for your contribution and wish you continued support to take the drive to completion. Ssriram mt (talk) 22:36, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ankitbhatt. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 21:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 21:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ra.One reference style issues[edit]

India Today ( a magazine) should be in italics (in |work parameter in case "cite web" is used).--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:40, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

" Mid-Day (January 10, 2011). "Kareena's 3 diets for her look in Ra.One". NDTV. Retrieved March 15, 2012." Why both mid day and NDTV?--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:42, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Vyavahare, Renuka (February 10, 2010). "Jackie Chan's acting pricey with SRK!". Indiatimes. Retrieved August 22, 2010.". Why Indiatimes in stead of Times of India.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:43, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Filmfare (magazine) should be in italics.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:47, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"I approached Karan, Adi for Ra.One: Shahrukh Khan". NDTV. October 11, 2011. p. u. Archived from the original on March 8, 2012. Retrieved October 11, 2011." What is "p.u."?
"^ a b c d e f g h i Maila, Ruma (November 2, 2011). "Khan, Super Khan". The Week. Retrieved March 19, 2012." Th Week is probably a magazine. Check. If yes, should be in italics. Why "s" in "super" in capital?--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:50, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Answers to your questions[edit]

  • Magazine names are supposed to be italicized? Does that include Stardust and Filmfare?
Yes, magazine, periodicals, newspaper, TV program names should be in italics, but not TV channel names.
  • Mid-Day was the actual source; NDTV was the publisher.
Then why Mid_day is in author field? Mid-day is not the author. According to you, Mid day is the actual source. So, you give that in the source (that is "work" parameter. It will be best if you can find the news in the website of mid day itself rather than through NDTV.
  • The publishing website is Indiatimes.com. hence the name. Indiatimes is a source for TOI and a few other related newspapers, hence solely TOI should not be used.
All Times of India articles are through "indiatimes". You have to maintain consistency. Either mention Indiatimes in all web references of ToI, or none. I see most of the other Times of India sources do not mention Indiatimes. I do not think you need to mention Indiatimes at all. All those sources should mention Times of India as |work or |newspaper.
  • I was hoping you could clarify what "p.u." means; nothing seems to be coming up in the actual reference.
Just delete those that.--Dwaipayan (talk) 22:33, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of highest-grossing Bollywood films (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Imtiaz Ali
Ra.One (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Telegraph

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blogger's reply on Image usage[edit]

Hey. Have you ever got any reply from any of the bloggers giving permission to use the images from the blog? I got one recently but then I do not know what to do next? Thanks. - VivvtTalk 18:51, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your detailed reply. I came across this blog and asked blog owner whether I can use Girish Kulkarni's image with his due permission or not. He replied saying the pictures for that were supplied by the pr so they are free to be used. Now will this be enough for OTRS team? or do I need to have more specifics about the copyright? Thanks. - VivvtTalk 12:15, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I ll do as said and ll keep you updated on it. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 19:09, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was actually too quick to upload the image without proper licensing. But then I contacted one of the administrators from Wikicommons and per him, blog owner mail wont suffice. I need to contact the PR to get the copyright status, which I believe would take lot of time. OTRS team would need an email from PR and not blog owner. So for the time being, I will change the image to non-free image to avoid deletion. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 13:40, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re NFA[edit]

These two films have been awarded with Best film on Social issues in non-feature film category. Most of the sources are referring them the way you stated, which is incorrect. Official release from PIB is referred while expanding the article. Rather when I created the article, it was stated wrong as Best Film on National Integration, which I later on updated per official source. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 12:31, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation[edit]

Hello, {{subst:PAGENAME}}! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Indian Premier League, an collaborative group which aims to support development of Indian Premier League related articles in Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Joining us helps to improve the quality of Indian Premier League-related articles which are not in a good condition. I hope that you won't dismiss this request. We trust you, Ankitbhatt/Archive 4, and we know that you have a lot of interest in this area. So why wait? Join fast! Thanks, and happy editing!

MessageDeliveryBot (talk) 19:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of IPL at 19:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC).[reply]

CC[edit]

I didn't copy everything tho, but yeah, It did sound off to me to paste the whole thing, but I can't do any large edits/copy editing right now considering the conditions I am in. I mostly edit these days for the sake of few sentences at a time and mostly because I am bored where I happen to be. (Kinda of a very long story I'd rather not speak of here on such a public platform). --Meryam90 (talk) 12:13, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2012 BRICS summit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lotus
2013 South Asian Games (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Equestrian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References cont[edit]

164.Nahta, Komal (October 26, 2011). "Ra.One Movie Review". Koimoi. Archived from the original on April 17, 2012. Retrieved October 26, 2011

Movie-->movie. Same for Ref 163.

155. "Ra.One mixed verdict: Are the audiences divided?". CNN-IBN. October 27, 2011. Archived from the original on April 22, 2012. Retrieved October 27, 2011.

Are-->are

152. "Shahrukh to pay 1 crore to lift a ban: Writer who sued Ra.One". e-News Gulf. October 22, 2011. Retrieved October 23, 2011.

The title in the source does not include "writer who sued...".

133. Pahwa, Nikhil (October 7, 2011). "Shahrukh Khan: Could never release Ra.One in 3,500 prints if not for digital; 50–60% digital prints". MediaNama. Retrieved October 17, 2011.

Could -->could

129. "Top worldwide openings (All Time): Ra.One and Don 2 lead". Box Office India. January 25, 2012. Retrieved January 25, 2012.

"all time"

121. Ra.One: Exclusive and authentic movie merchandise". Seventymm. Retrieved October 20, 2011.

"exclusive".

98.S, Anusha (September 27, 2011). "SRK's superhero power: Turning Ra.One to marketing gold". Business Today. Retrieved October 3, 2011.

"turning"

66. Dasgupta, Sagorika (November 12, 2011). "The Ra.One Effect". BoxOfficeIndia.co.in. Retrieved April 14, 2012.

"effect"

24. Dasgupta, Sagorika; Shah, Jigah (September 25, 2011). "Ra.One: Decoded". BoxOfficeIndia.co.in. Archived from the original on March 9, 2012. Retrieved September 28, 2011.

"decoded".

Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Ra.One, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CGI and Reflection (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ra.One referencing continued[edit]

Is "Mumbai Boss" the publisher of The First Post. Looking at the website, it seems Mumbai Boss itself is a sort of magazine (I am not sure, you should verify). At the end of the interview, there is a line "This story by Rubina A Khan was originally published on Firstpost.com.". So, best would be to cite the original interview in First post, with the actual name of the author.

  • "When SRK calls, even Rajni overrules family advice". Mid-Day. In.com.

Why both Mid_day and In.com again?

  • "'We can't compete with foreign filmmakers': SRK". Indo-Asian News Service (The Express Tribune).

Why The Express Tribune within brackets, and not italicized? It is a newspaper.

  • "Ra.One rides YouTube wave". The Hindu Business Line.

Incomplete wikilink and italicization of newspaper.

  • "'Glad everyone liking Arjun's look': SRK". Indo-Asian News Service (The Times of India)

The newspaper is within brackets!!

  • "PlayStation launches game on SRK flick Ra.One". Press Trust of India (The Economic Times).

Again in brackets.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You told, "there is nothing incorrect in the Mid-Day and In.com part. Mid-Day is the work, In.com is publisher".
In the reference, I see the website in In.com. And midday is mentioned in the place where usually the name of a human author is given.
In this case, you are considering mid day as work and in.com as publisher. So, you are essentially providing the name of the publisher for a newspaper, is that correct? So, you are not maintaining the internal consistency of the article. No other newspaper references mention their publisher, so why this time?
If the article is really written by Mid Day, why can not we find it in Mid Day website? Does that mean Mid Day in this case is working just as a news agency? I do not know. Please try to find out.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:38, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


  • ^ "Top worldwide openings (All Time): Ra.One and Don 2 lead". Box Office India

Why caps in All Time?

  • "Ra.One (2011) (Hindi Movie / Bollywood Film / Indian Cinema DVD)".

Caps again.

  • "R.One includes a tribute to Rajinikanth". Press Trust of India (Hindustan Times)

R.one --> Ra.One; Newspaper in brackets.

  • Adarsh, Taran (October 24, 2011). "Ra.One: Movie review". Bollywood Hungama

Movie should be movie.

  • Mohamed, Khalid (October 25, 2011). "Ra.One: Quite a thrill ride"

Quite -->quite

  • Kazmi, Nikhat (October 26, 2011). "Ra.One – Times of India". The Times of India

Wrong title.

  • ^ "Ra.One raises the bar for Hindi films". Indo-Asian News Service.

Does not mention source (newspaper, website etc)

  • ^ "Ra.One move review". India Today. October 26, 2011

Spelling

  • "Ra.One review: Aiyyo! This superhero falls short". Sify. Retrieved October 28, 2011

Does not mention author.

  • "Review: Ra.One- not your usual SRK film". Zee News. October 26, 2011.

Probably needs an ndash. --Dwaipayan (talk) 15:38, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More on refernces[edit]

117. S, Anish K (October 14, 2011). "Ra.One game no.1 on iPhone appstore". Technics Today. Retrieved October 14, 2011.

This is a blog, and may not be considered as a reliable source for the information it supports.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:10, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

262. Khan, Shahrukh; Jackman, Hugh. Hugh Jackman likes SRK's Ra.One. Mid-Day.

Does not mention retrieval date. And Lehren seems to be the actual publisher.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:26, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

242.Nahta,Komal (September 19, 2011). "How Shahrukh Khan's Ra.One Will Recover 150 Crore". Koimoi. Retrieved September 23, 2011.

Is koimoi.com considered a reliable source? I am not sure. If you retain this, there should be a space between Nahta and Komal.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:35, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

238.^ "Top openings overseas (All time updated) 21/02/12". Box Office India. February 21, 2012. Retrieved April 07, 2012.

"All time" should be "all time". Same for reference number 236, 229, 227, 222, 215.

230. ^ "Family powers Ra.One on Day I". The Telegraph. October 27, 2011. Retrieved October 27, 2011.

Day one should be day one.

225. Ra.One (Hindi) has good extended first week". November 4, 2011. Box Office India. Retrieved November 4, 2011.

The publication date following the title is in italics. Should be non-italics.

211.Ra.One advance: Excellent". Box Office India. October 25, 2011. Archived from the original on April 11, 2012. Retrieved April 11, 2012.

"Excellent" -->"excellent".

204. Roy, Priyanka (October 26, 2011). "Ra.One raises price bar at plexes; Fans sing rah-rah Ra.One - City shows willingness to pay more for SRK’s big Diwali release today". The Telegraph. Retrieved April 10, 2012.

Fans-->fans; City-->city.

185. Sen, Raja (October 26, 2011). "Raja Sen: Ra.One: What a letdown!". Rediff. Archived from the original on April 22, 2012. Retrieved December 17, 2011

"What"-->"what"

Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:50, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That video (from mid day) shows the name Lehren on the top right corner. So, I thought Lehren is the producer, while Mid-Day just hosted the video. Not sure.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:54, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Post-production[edit]

Ankit, I read the post-production part. Nicely written. The process, and multiple delays causing anxiety is almost tangible! great work. Only thing that I would mention I had some difficulty in a few technical or technique-oriented terms. For example, ...making use of a global digital pipeline. What is a global digital pipeline? Any wikilinks available for this?

Also, Filmmaker Vikram Bhatt later criticized films which featured converted 3D as opposed to filmed 3D (including Ra.One), saying that conversion was a "great disservice"... I think mention "including Ra.One after "converted 3D" rather than after "filmed 3D". Also, The process of inter-mediation (DI) of the film was completed in Prime Focus' mainframe facility... You are using the abbreviation DI for the mentioned term "intermediation", which really do not tally. Use the full term Digital intermediation once, then give DI, then you can use only DI subsequently.

Other than these minor ones, this section is a very nice and entertaining read. Well done!--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:33, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HighBeam[edit]

Hello, Ankitbhatt. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ocaasi t | c 11:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Week source for Ra.One[edit]

Here is a copy of the article that I skimmed off a Google cache:

I've collapsed it in a convenient table to save you some space on the talkpage. Hope this helps. -Thibbs (talk) 12:21, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I just saw your note. The original place I skimmed the article from is located here, but I don't know how long the url will retain the information so I wouldn't link to it in the Wikipedia article. -Thibbs (talk) 12:45, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ra.One[edit]

I may review your article (so far, I'd only suggest more "the film", "it", "the production" to reduce the repetition of Ra.One, as you shortened an issue I had noticed before, high number of fair use pics) and even try to do something to Tron (though it'll hardly get to GA level by tomorrow or Monday). igordebraga ≠ 17:33, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ankitbhatt. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled.
Message added 12:29, 1 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:29, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ra.One Train Indoor Filming.JPG[edit]

I could not verify that the author releases it as PD. Can you please show where in the link is this info given? --Redtigerxyz Talk 13:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the Commons:Commons:OTRS, use "Templates to use on image pages" and ask some OTRS volunteer to check if you have already sent a mail. --Redtigerxyz Talk 14:02, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ChammakSample.ogg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ChammakSample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:56, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kareena Costume CC.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kareena Costume CC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Economics of Ra.One[edit]

Hi Ankitbhatt! I just saw the new page you created, Economics of Ra.One. It looks like you split it from Ra.One, but you didn't say where it came from in your edit summary. This is actually a violation of Wikipedia's content licence, as the text you copied needs to be attributed to its authors. Have a look at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia for the details. Thanks! — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 15:50, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thanks a lot for the barnstar. And great job on Ra.One, wish you all the best. :-) Smarojit (talk) 04:15, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SRK as G.One.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SRK as G.One.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:16, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Making of Ra.One poster.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Making of Ra.One poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ra.One[edit]

Hi Ankit. Ra.One is at a very high level, not at FA level currently, stability being a major issue. I suggest after the reconstruction is complete, get it peer reviewed and then you come back to FAC. I know you have worked hard and improved the article immensely and come a far way since your Afro-Asian Games days. Let me know if you need constructive criticism after the reconstruction. --Redtigerxyz Talk 09:33, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About time, I do not decide that, FA delegates will. If I see my initial concerns are being addressed, I will strike my Oppose. The concerns I have raised currently are not comprehensive. I have not read the whole article. Also, the examples ( 'Ra.One utilized a record extent of marketing for a Bollywood film, with the level of promotions being described as "the most comprehensive and all-pervasive among people's lives"' ...) given may be few and the same principle (WP:NPOV) needs to be applied to the whole article. --Redtigerxyz Talk 09:51, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Checking. --Redtigerxyz Talk 10:03, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[See main] doesn't work. Wikipedia:SUMMARYSTYLE#References--Redtigerxyz Talk 10:11, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Ra.One#Post-production_summary_comments. Please do not strike reviewers' comments. It becomes difficult to check if issue is addressed. Write "Done" instead. --Redtigerxyz Talk 11:07, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ra.One[edit]

If you intend to keep working on Ra.One, I will gladly continue my prose review on the article's talk page. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 03:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: topic[edit]

Yea, that's certainly a feasible topic, although I'm a bit surprised at the number of sub-articles. Are you sure none of them can be merged back into the main one? Books are incredibly easy to do. Check out this book. You just have to list all of the articles. As far as I know, this would be the first topic for a singular movie, fwiw. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, well good luck then! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:27, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SRK as G.One.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SRK as G.One.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:16, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Krrish review[edit]

I made the initial change requests and have been waiting for more comments, however I may have limited access to WP this weekend, so no rush. Cheers, BollyJeff | talk 20:12, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Shahrukh Khan#The_ageing_controveresy[edit]

Hello. A discussion about a controversial piece of material with regard to WP:BLP is taking place here. Please spare a few moments to comment. Thank you. Secret of success (talk) 16:22, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of World Heritage Sites in India[edit]

Sorry that I didn't get to this earlier; I just plain forgot about the message on my talk page. My apologies. As for the list, I think it's in reasonable shape, although I see a few things that FLC reviewers may take issue with. If I was to offer recommendations, I'd say to limit photos to one per site – there's a lot of ugly whitespace in the entries without multiple photos now – and consider asking for a copy-edit for the descriptions, which look a bit long at first glance. Also, make sure the descriptions in the tentative list are cited, and that all tables have the necessary accessibility updates for things like row and column scopes. The lead could probably be added to a bit as well. Despite these issues, I think FL status is doable. Giants2008 (Talk) 16:33, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ankitbhatt. You have new messages at DRAGON BOOSTER's talk page.
Message added 20:31, 28 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 20:31, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ra.One :)[edit]

You and Ra.One are inseparable and I can probably guess that you are also a huge SRK fan. Came across this and found it funny. Thought of sharing it with you. No offense intended!! Thanks. - VivvtTalk 13:26, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I have seen Rajni-carrying-SRK. Even there is one more of Amitabh in the getup of Paa. And I found none funny. :) Thanks. - VivvtTalk 15:06, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I will try to review it next week. A little busy.. but in a quick glance, I noticed issues raised by me in the FAC not addressed. Please them till then. --Redtigerxyz Talk 04:39, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re Shahrukh Khan filmography[edit]

It is extremely bad form to move an article to another title immediately after an RM decision, especially without consulting the admin who made the close decision. Had you wanted the title you suggested, you should have participated in the RM. However, the title you suggested would probably not comply with WP:Title's consistency criteria since almost all other filmographies are named [subject filmography]]. I have move protected the article for 60 days.--Mike Cline (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kahaani nominated for GA[edit]

Hi Ankit, I've finally nominated Kahaani for GA after months of expansion. Will you be interested in reviewing the article and help it to reach the desired status? I've asked SOS too for the same. Thanks in advance --Msrag (talk) 06:07, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are needed...[edit]

....over here. Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Centenary_year. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:36, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Krrish[edit]

Are you still reviewing Krrish? BollyJeff | talk 11:46, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be able to spend some time on the review, instead of working so much on MEA? I am eager to see what else you have to say. Its been almost a month, and I would like to wrap it up soon if possible. I don't like splitting my efforts among too many jobs at once. BollyJeff | talk 16:44, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What in your opinion are the best sources for awards received? BollyJeff | talk 14:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have mostly completed the references except that some better sources for awards would help, which is why I asked the above question. I also put some comments on the review page. References for awards are also a problem on the awards articles themselves. Even on something like Academy Award for Best Actor, there are zero third party sources, except aggdata. The primary source must be accepted. BollyJeff | talk 17:35, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, you think I haven't tried Google search?!? Millions of hits come up, all potentially unreliable. If you cannot tell me what is reliable, then how can you tell me what is not. I do not believe that IIFA web site is an unusable first-party source for IIFA awards received by Krrish. If it was the Krrish official web site saying that they got the awards, then yes. I removed sources from Krrish official website, and I removed VFX awards referenced on Prasad VFX website, as you asked. Those were certainly first-party. Another solution is to remove all awards, which would seem extreme. I see that's how it is often handled, though. They create a new article with just the awards, that will not be part of the GA. That's hardly a good choice for Krrish with so few awards. I would like to take up this issue of official awards with a third party administrator or the like for clarification, because it extends to more than just this article. Do you know how to do that? BollyJeff | talk 18:28, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Do you also reject the press release from Indian government on National awards as first party? I see that used on other GAs. BollyJeff | talk 18:37, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am getting tensed up because I feel you are being to tough about this, and I want an answer as to what can and cannot be used. Almost all Bollywood film articles use sources such as this for Filmfare, and this for IIFA, including many GAs. If they are not good, then more than just you and I need to discuss it. One of us should start an RfC. BollyJeff | talk 18:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
These are only the films; I did not check the actors. Thanks for the sources, I have added them, and more as well. I still believe that first-party is okay for awards, otherwise as AnimeshKulkarni said in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Bollywood_Awards, only big stars who are regularly covered in news will have good sources. I revived that thread, and there are some comments coming in favor for allowing award sites. BollyJeff | talk 17:20, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Highbeam Research[edit]

Hi. Not sure if you have applied for this or not but in a recent article on a 2004 independent Filipino movie I found this to be an incredible resource and found lots of Filipino newspaper articles not picked up by google. I strongly recommend this for anyone who edits articles on films and cinema personalities to get this asap as it wil be an invaluable research tool and will often turn up detailed articles which will not appear in google. You can gain access to the full articles by applying for it at Wikipedia:HighBeam/Applications. For sure it'll have tons on Indian actors and films which so far you've been unable to access on google. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:48, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you might, just ensuring that all (good) active Indian cinema contributors know about it!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:04, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, you can quickly access it and google books in your top panel by the coding shown on User talk:Smarojit if this helps you.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:05, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mughal-e-Azam[edit]

Sir, I really appreciate ur work with Mughal-e-Azam article. But have you noticed that the article shows too much bias about the film's budget and classiness, also there are only 14 references in the whole article? So pls improve it, and all the best. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:41, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Let me go through it thoroughly and I'll get back to you. Thanks for writing in :) --Msrag (talk) 07:04, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Found this, looks awesome... might help you... :) Thanks. - VivvtTalk 12:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem. I, myself got so much tempted to put these pictures, thought you would use them appropriately, than me hovering over the article every now and then. :P Thanks. - VivvtTalk 13:39, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was interested in it, but was finding it hard to get solid sources, as you may have seen by now. I don't know what the requirements are for comprehensiveness to reach FA, but it would certainly be unfair if only new movies (and other subjects) could reach GA/FA, just because there are more sources, when there exist other, much more significant movies (and other subjects), that have less sources available because they are old. Certainly there must be a way around this. We should look around for "short" articles with GA/FA status. BollyJeff | talk 18:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, if you could organize those sources somewhere in your userspace, then I could help. I am getting a bit busy now though (as are you). BollyJeff | talk 18:32, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Apart from just online sources, we should even try for books or publish evidence we receive from the film makers themselves (if they still live) to elevate articles. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:05, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah (1980 film)[edit]

Hi :) . Thanks for taking the time to extend the greeting and glance at the article. I have moved it to mainspace. Would be listening in for any suggestions you and others may have later. AnshumanF (talk) 22:08, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Congratulations[edit]

Hey Ankit !! Thank you so much for the that. Phew.. So finally after 3 months, Kahaani is a GA now. Co-incidentally I started editing on the article on 11-March-2012 and today on 11-June-2012, it passed. And yea I am looking forward to make it a FA, but will be taking a short break from the article (not WP) since I even started dreaming about it in my sleep. :P I got a whole load of stuffs which I actually wanted to add it for GA but couldn't do so because of time constraints and meanwhile, I'll start looking into other articles. And yea I shouldn't delay in acknowledging that the review was indeed quite comprehensive pointing out so many minute details which will be really helpful for my next GA. Thanks for your patience for pointing out all that stuffs. Reg review of another article, I guess I'll be only able to take it up from next week as I am held up finishing my work related tasks this week. If any article is still listed by then, I'll start or else its fine. Thanks once again dude. --Msrag (talk) 08:59, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it ws a very nice and detailed review. Both Ankit and Tito are doing great GA reviews. Bye the way, Ankit, can you generally point out what is the "big formatting inconsistency in the references" that you found in the article but allowed in GA review? Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:28, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker)Consistency in references is a criteria for FA, not GA. So it wasn't a problem during the GA review. :) -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 16:17, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but what was the inconsistency? There may be small inconsistencies, but Ankit said there was "a big" formatting inconsistency. So, that should be corrected.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, now it is clarified. Ankit is referring to general inconsistency of the formatting of refs. I have not looked at the references of Kahaani in a while. Msrag has been taking good care of those. I think those inconsistencies will be addressed soon. It is often better if one single editor works in formatting the references. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:34, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I never thought that there could be problems with references even after Karthik, Dwaipayanc and Me have worked extensively to resolve those. Anyways single editor working on it is a nice idea and I shall take up the matter to make it consistent through out the article.--Msrag (talk) 07:13, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

section split[edit]

I'd like u to take part in this discussion: Talk:Mughal-e-Azam#section split. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:03, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

image[edit]

I just wanted to let u know that Bollywood Hungama still has some images of the premiere of Ra.One in London and toronto.--Meryam90 (talk) 19:48, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Help Survey[edit]

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 18:06, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

59th NFA[edit]

Hey..With the official catalogue released last week, I finished the article editing with the help of Animesh. Can you quickly check and let me know if you find something before we push it for PR? Thanks. - VivvtTalk 19:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk back[edit]

Hello, Ankitbhatt. You have new messages at Northamerica1000's talk page.
Message added 00:42, 15 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Opinion[edit]

Would you mind weighing in your opinion here. —Vensatry (Ping me) 04:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost and the Indian Cinema Task Force[edit]

Sounds like there are some exciting things going on at the Indian Cinema Task Force. I can definitely get the project an entry in next week's news sidebar and throughout July if you'd like. We're currently working on a special series of interviews with sports projects which will take up all of July and most of August, so the earliest I can get the Indian Cinema Task Force scheduled for a full-blown interview will be late August to early September. -Mabeenot (talk) 02:09, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

X-Men: First Class[edit]

Hi, Ankitbhatt. Absolutely. We're getting to each point, and will keep you apprised when done. And I just want to say that I and I 'm sure our compatriot editors appreciate very much your taking the time and making such a thorough effort! With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 13:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: jstor[edit]

My access is through my university. I am not sure if individuals as such can access it.--Dwaipayan (talk) 21:28, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at TheSpecialUser's talk page. →TSU tp* 15:51, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

mughal-e-azam[edit]

everyone is impressed with your work on the article Mughal-e-Azam, congrats. but it appears to have been assessed as "C" or "stub" class in the talk page. can u pls get that corrected? Kailash29792 (talk) 09:20, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GAN[edit]

Even though I'm not in a hurry (specially as I could use the 60 points in July), still waiting for more comments in Talk:X-Men: First Class/GA1. igordebraga ≠ 04:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Worked some more and did what you requested, can you go further on the review? (maybe we could get it done by Thursday!) igordebraga ≠ 19:13, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You said it was on your watchlist, yet I reply "done" and you don't continue. Oh, well. igordebraga ≠ 03:06, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know you have some reviews. But I'll just be patient and wait for when the review can go further. Sorry about bothering you. igordebraga ≠ 12:51, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Final Destination 2[edit]

Hello, Ankitbhatt. You have new messages at FDJoshua22's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at TheSpecialUser's talk page. →TSU tp* 14:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dhoom 3 logo.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Dhoom 3 logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


A barnstar for you![edit]

Pls share ur thoughts here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mughal-e-Azam#GA_nomination ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 12:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies[edit]

But I won't be able to finish the review of your article. Don't be discouraged, it's not uncommon for articles to go a couple weeks without comments and eventually be promoted. Good luck, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Mughal-e-Azam, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CGI and Docket (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indian film songs articles[edit]

If you get a chance, please express your opinion here. - VivvtTalk 17:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awards sources[edit]

After my comment here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Bollywood_Awards, four other editors agreed that first party sources are okay for simple awards listing. No other editors were opposed. As one of them mentioned, the official Academy Awards site is used everywhere for Hollywood films. If other reliable sources can be found, they maybe should be added, but first party is okay if not. BollyJeff | talk 18:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FA Expansion of Kahaani[edit]

Hi Ankit, can you please have a look here and voice your opinions about the same. ...Msrag talk2me 12:52, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

Hey ! I just dropped by to see if you have any suggestions for the discussion taking place here. And thanks for your good work. Keep Doing it ! Bineet Ojha |BINEET| 16:06, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mughal e Azam movie Color BW comparison.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Mughal e Azam movie Color BW comparison.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 07:37, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mughal-e-Azam Pyar Kiya Toh Darna Kya.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Mughal-e-Azam Pyar Kiya Toh Darna Kya.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 07:40, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Red Chillies VFX Ra.One Award.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Red Chillies VFX Ra.One Award.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:09, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FAC nomination[edit]

I tend to make comments on FA or FL candidates spontaneously; I'll certainly have a look at the article sometime in the next few days and get back to you -- I am currently preoccupied with work and am focusing on getting the GA nominations down. Lemonade51 (talk) 18:17, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have been quite busy and have had little internet access - I will try to read the article (which is pretty lengthy) carefully and make some comments in the next few days. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 13:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I made a few comments on the Ra.One talk page - sorry I missed the FAC. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gangs of Wasseypur[edit]

Thought you'd like to know that I have listed Gangs of Wasseypur to be moved to Gangs of Wasseypur Part 1.Ayanosh (talk) 12:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cast of Ra.One[edit]

Just Added talk page on Your daughter article .This article is presented using prose.It would be better if you also add lead part etc. Thank You 25 CENTS VICTORIOUSϟ 15:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for your help. Andreas has been harrassing me and threatening edit-wars, and making multiple personal attacks. I feel they are trying to tarnish my image at wikipedia. So thanks. I am so sick of getting bullied around by him, and it was nice to have someone stand-up for those being abused (me). You rock! ~ GabeMc (talk|contribs) 23:57, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Posters[edit]

Please make sure that posters do not exceed a resolution of 500*500 before you upload them. As per WP:NFCC, "Low- rather than high-resolution/fidelity/bit rate is used" for non-free media. I have uploaded a new version of a file you recently uploaded, and changed the fair-use template to Non-free use rationale poster, which explains the rationale in greater detail. Secret of success (talk) 12:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification[edit]

If I may clarify my point, there is nothing wrong with asking MRG for advice. As is evident, she gives great advice. However, a call for admins to take some action should not be on her site. I was reacting to that request.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Anarkali as Madhubala.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Anarkali as Madhubala.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your behaviour Andreasegde/GabeMc[edit]

I have observed your response to the request from User:GabeMc regarding User:Andreasegde and I think your response was quite inequitable or lopsided. You used scolding and belittling tone to Andreasegde here and praising and forgiving tone with GabeMc here for the same type of misbehaviour, arguments, and insults flung back and forth. Both editors have been involved in this mud slinging down a long and winding road. It would appear you have taken the side of the whiney one, that approached you first, without sufficient research into both sides. GabeMc is good at image politics and thus I have reported his behaviour at [WP:ANI] for others to have a look at. This behaviour pattern has ben disruptive for too long as he attempts to push the same issue for years. 99.251.125.65 (talk) 12:15, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

I mentioned your name in a comment I left at ANI. It's no big deal, certainly nothing bad, but I think I'm supposed to notify you. This is what I get for being foolish enough to throw my hat into that drama-fest. Regards. Joefromrandb (talk) 19:34, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Final Destination 2[edit]

Article revised and updated. Tuned in for your next reviews. --FDJoshua22 (talk) 08:48, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mughal-e-Azam[edit]

Are you coming back to this anytime soon? Is there something else that I should work on here? I feel that it could almost go to GA review now. BollyJeff | talk 01:51, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uttar Pradesh[edit]

Hi, I've listed this article for peer review.Please give your important suggestions.Thank You -25 CENTS VICTORIOUS☣ 06:46, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hai Ye Maya for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hai Ye Maya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hai Ye Maya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Bill william comptonTalk 06:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Arjun Rampal Ra.One.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Arjun Rampal Ra.One.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Boseritwik (talk) 09:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mughal-e-Azam BW Colour comparison.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Mughal-e-Azam BW Colour comparison.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Boseritwik (talk) 09:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Oblivion Promo.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Oblivion Promo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Boseritwik (talk) 09:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Phijigee Mani poster.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Phijigee Mani poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Boseritwik (talk) 09:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Ra.One Cubical Formations.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Ra.One Cubical Formations.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Boseritwik (talk) 09:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Shanghai Poster.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Shanghai Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Boseritwik (talk) 09:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arjun Rampal Ra.One.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Arjun Rampal Ra.One.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:30, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Final Destination 2/GA1[edit]

Could you continue / complete your review here? It's been three weeks since it was last edited. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:20, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Cinema Task Force in the Signpost[edit]

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on the Indian Cinema Task Force for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 16:48, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

revewing[edit]

Hi Ankitbhatt. Did you run the usual checks for possible copyvios and close paraphrasing when you reviewed this article?. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:13, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOHGBF listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect LOHGBF. Since you had some involvement with the LOHGBF redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ironholds (talk) 11:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ankitbhatt. You have new messages at Mabeenot's talk page.
Message added 16:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Mabeenot (talk) 16:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ye Kahan Aa Gaye Hum listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ye Kahan Aa Gaye Hum. Since you had some involvement with the Ye Kahan Aa Gaye Hum redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). BollyJeff | talk 19:40, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Beatles RfC[edit]

Hello Ankitbhatt; this message is to inform you that there is currently a public poll to determine whether to capitalize the definite article ("the") when mentioning the band "THE BEATLES" mid-sentence. As you've previously participated either here, here, or here, your input would be appreciated. Thank you for your time. For the mediators. ~ GabeMc (talk|contribs) 22:48, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SKYP.JPG[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SKYP.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SuperMarioMan 17:58, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

what is this of you[edit]

did u know? in Ra.One (a good article), a lot of content has been deleted by IP users and you never took notice of it? pls go through the article, and also check revision histories to help restore deleted content. the article should have a permanent protection from IP users bcoz they can remove anything without telling and its difficult to be notified of their misdeeds. I say this to User:Bollyjeff also. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:20, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

JSTOR[edit]

Hi there. Good news: you're up next for a free JSTOR account, since you signed up Wikipedia:Requests for JSTOR access.

JSTOR will provide you access via an email invitation, so to get your account, please email me (swalling@wikimedia.org) with...

  • the subject line "JSTOR"
  • your English Wikipedia username
  • your preferred email address for a JSTOR account

The above information will be given to JSTOR to provide you with your account, but will otherwise remain private. Please do so ASAP or drop me a message to say you don't want/need an account any longer. We're waiting to deliver access to everyone until we have the 100 recipients collected, so the sooner you reply the quicker everyone can start using JSTOR.

Thank you! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 22:32, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another gentle *poke*. Just a last few people and everyone can start getting access. :) Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 23:52, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I did in fact pass you up as unresponsive, but it turns out I have one last slot open. If you can give me your email address as noted above by Monday, then I can still include you. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 21:27, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer[edit]

I have requested for reviewer rights but I don't know how to review an article. Can you please help me?----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 10:29, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ankitbhatt/Archive_4&oldid=1147978087"