User talk:AntaresTheWaste

AntaresTheWaste, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi AntaresTheWaste! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mr. Bones' Wild Ride (October 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mr. Bones' Wild Ride and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mr. Bones' Wild Ride, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 13:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- ferret (talk) 22:55, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AntaresTheWaste (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

???????? Why have I been blocked? Why have my contributions been reverted?! There was NOTHING wrong with them! WHY did they need to go?! I haven't committed any abuse, I have just tried to add more info to the project. It's unfair! Look at all of my edits, all of my contributions, do you see anything wrong with them? I've done nothing wrong since I started editing. Do you see anything wrong with my edits? I will expect an answer and restitution or I will come back with more words and questions.

Decline reason:

You are community banned from editing under any account or IP address. As such, your contributions will not be allowed to stand even if valid, as allowing them would defeat the purpose of your blocks and bans. To have any hope of being unblocked, you need to return to your original account and request unblock using WP:UTRS- though I suspect you aren't interested in doing that. I am declining this and removing talk page access to prevent more time wasting for all parties(including you). 331dot (talk) 12:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

AntaresTheWaste (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27031 was submitted on Oct 07, 2019 12:25:42. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:25, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saying you will continue to disregard Wikipedia policies and evade your ban means there is nothing else to discuss with you. I have recommended that this account's UTRS access be withdrawn. You have no hope of being unbanned/unblocked until you indicate that you are willing to abide by Wikipedia policies(even if you disagree with them) and wait the minimum of six months with zero edits under any account or IP. 331dot (talk) 12:36, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, there is nothing else to discuss with you since you indicate that Wikipedia policies don't concern you and you will not respect the blocks and ban against you. It isn't even up to me or any admin to unblock you as you are community banned, meaning the community must decide that unblocking you benefits the project. Your accounts will eventually be detected and blocked and if you have time in your life to play that game, everyone here does too. If you truly want a clean start, you need to respect Wikipedia policies. If you don't wish to do that, as I said, there is nothing else to discuss. 331dot (talk) 02:10, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]