User talk:Antonyapm

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Antonyapm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Secret ^account 03:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 19:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have to read the guidelines in WP:RFA, with only two edits you don't qualify for an RFA, you must have at least six months of editing experience with thousands of contructive edits, article writing experience, Wikipedia namespace experience, etc. Thanks Secret ^account 03:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Use of adminhelp template[edit]

Hello, I have noticed you using {{adminhelp}} on more than one page, with the heading "Edit request from Antonyapm". This template is meant to draw administrator attention to something that needs to be done. If you need help, please add a query underneath the template so that the administrators know what they can do. Please don't leave blank {{adminhelp}} or {{helpme}} requests. Cheers, sonia♫ 10:20, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Helpme[edit]

Hello Antonyapm. You used the {{helpme}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{helpme}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the new contributors help desk, the help desk, or join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access.

Antonyapm (talk) 16:55, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yshakh[edit]

The article Yshakh has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WuhWuzDat 18:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yshakh[edit]

A tag has been placed on Yshakh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WuhWuzDat 18:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Yshakh. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WuhWuzDat 18:41, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from articles without addressing the issue, as you did with Yshakh. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. WuhWuzDat 18:41, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with Yshakh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. WuhWuzDat 18:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Antonyapm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir please unblock my account Antonyapm (talk) 01:49, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That is a polite request but it is completely empty. Why is this block not, in fact, necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikpedia? Is it no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, agree not do it again, and will make productive contributions instead? At a minimum, you need to address the reasons for your block, acknowledge what was wrong, convince us that you will refrain in the future from similar problematic edits, and tell us what productive things you will do instead.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:44, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.