User talk:Anyaverkhovskaya

Anya Verkhovskaya

June 2009

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to A.B. Data, Ltd., without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 03:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to A.B. Data, Ltd., without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wperdue (talk) 03:25, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anya Verkhovskaya

The article Anya Verkhovskaya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a CV service

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Astronaut (talk) 07:21, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anya Verkhovskaya

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Anya Verkhovskaya, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Anya Verkhovskaya and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:06, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiography and promotion

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Anya Verkhovskaya. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:10, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit Wikipedia too, under the name Marek69. Wikipedia is an all-volunteer operation, and I'm one of the many volunteers here who help review edits. Everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, but I noticed that one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Anya Verkhovskaya with this edit, seemed to be unconstructive. I have reverted it for now, and ask that in the future you please use the sandbox for test edits, not encyclopedia articles. It also helps to provide an informative edit summary so that other editors like me have a brief description of your change to Wikipedia. If you have questions, you might want to take a look at this tutorial. Also, feel free to ask me questions on my talk page. Marek.69 ^talk 02:11, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anya Verkhovskaya with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Marek.69 ^talk 02:17, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Anya Verkhovskaya. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Marek.69 ^talk 02:32, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Anya Verkhovskaya. Marek.69 ^talk 02:40, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Repeated Vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:12, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]