User talk:Aoba47/Archive 13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Failed nomination and future project[edit]

Hey Aoba, sorry for not coming by earlier. I just wanted to let you know that I'm sorry you became disheartened with Severine's article, I know first-hand how terrible it feels to work very hard on an article and be made to feel like people are either indifferent to your hard work or trying to break it down. I guess I just wanted to let you know that I'm well aware of how much work you put on this site and how much you've improved numerous articles. I also wanted to tell you that I appreciate the help you have provided with some of the articles I've worked on and that I'm always keeping an eye out for your latest masterpiece. <3

On a sitenote; I'm especially interested in seeing what you do with Satsu's article. I believe you had previously tried to work on it but decided against it? PanagiotisZois (talk) 03:54, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @PanagiotisZois: Thank you for your message! It means a lot to me so I greatly appreciate your kind words. I always enjoy reading through your projects too so I am looking forward to your next ones as well! The Satsu article is the next one in line for me; it will take a lot of time as I find it a more difficult article to write than others. I am just happy to have all of the references correctly formatted and ready to go for when I do decide to start. I had previously decided against working on the article as it would take up a lot of time and energy and I was uncertain if I could do the article justice (Satsu is actually my favorite character from the Buffy comics oddly enough). I apologize for the long message, and I hope that you have a wonderful rest of your day! And a <3 to you as well! Aoba47 (talk) 04:54, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm seeing Satsu's article and I'm fucking loving it! God, I can't wait to see the whole thing. Kinda weird that she hasn't made a reappearance since Season Eight though. PanagiotisZois (talk) 23:44, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am glad that you are liking it so far! It is a very difficult topic to write about so I am taking my time with it. I am assuming that they are keeping the focus on the main cast from the television show, but she actually makes a brief appearance in Season Ten in the issue In Pieces on the Ground, Part One. I would love for her to make more appearances, but I have feeling that the Buffy comics may be coming to an end in the near future. Aoba47 (talk) 23:54, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Aoba47. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FAC reviewing barnstar[edit]

The Reviewer Barnstar
FAC can't function without people like you contributing reviews. Thank you for the eight reviews you did during November. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you! Hope you are doing well. Aoba47 (talk) 23:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate your comments as always here, Aoba. Do let me know if you are interested in reviewing this by pinging me. Thank you.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 12:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Experiences survey[edit]

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of If I Don't Have You[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article If I Don't Have You you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 06:21, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hot Sugar (Tamar Braxton song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 06:21, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Third Eye Shoppe[edit]

Thank you for reviewing "The Art Teacher". Only if you're interested, I nominated a short article for Good status back in April, but so far no one has taken on the review. Not sure how much you enjoy reviewing or not (personally, I don't conduct GA reviews), but I was wondering if you might be willing. Third Eye Shoppe is quite short, and has already received a copy edit by GOCE. If you're not interested, or prefer to stick to music articles, no problem! Thanks again for the review, and for your contributions to Wikipedia! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:39, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your message. I will review it later today if that is okay. Aoba47 (talk) 17:32, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Anytime, I am glad that I could help out. Aoba47 (talk) 20:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, only if you're interested, I've co-nominated People's Bike Library of Portland for Good article status. The article's not very long, if you're looking for another article to review. If not, no worries, and either way, happy new year! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your message, and the article is interesting. Unfortunately, I am taking a break from GAN reviews for the time being. Hope you have a wonderful new year! Aoba47 (talk) 19:11, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why I'm so obsessed with and fascinated by this show; maybe it's due to my affinity for Pawn Stars, and I really think it would have done better had it been on History rather than GSN. Nevertheless, I've tried my hand at making the article as expansive as possible, and I wanted to ask if you could take a quick look at it and let me know if you think it has a shot at FAC. It's a bit on the shorter side, but then again, so is Chains of Love and your nomination seems to be going well. Cheers, --Bcschneider53 (talk) 22:57, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your message! I will look through it tomorrow if that is okay with you. Aoba47 (talk) 23:00, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Bcschneider53: Everything in the article looks good to me; I would recommend adding ALT text to the images. Aoba47 (talk) 06:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Aoba47: Thank you! I have nominated the article at FAC. Would appreciate a full review if you have the time, though this is the busiest time of the year, so no stress if that is not currently possible for you. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 20:41, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I will review it sometime in the upcoming weeks if that is okay with you. Aoba47 (talk) 22:13, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Madeleine[edit]

Dear Aoba47! Can you make août character Dr. Madeleine Swann from Spectre 2015, which played Léa Seydoux and find separate poster? If you make this article, I will be grateful! Thank you! --178.71.216.46 (talk) 05:18, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your message. I am currently taking a break from writing articles on fictional characters as they take a lot of time and energy. However, I have not seen Spectre and I do not have an interest in seeing it in the immediate future. While I may work on articles for James Bond characters in the future, I would probably choose one of the three as I have more an attachment or interesting in them: May Day, Elektra King, or Xenia Onatopp. I am always more interested in the female villains in the franchise to be honest. Thank you for your request though! Hopefully, someone will create this article someday as there appears to be enough coverage for the character to do it. Aoba47 (talk) 06:32, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hot Sugar (Tamar Braxton song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hot Sugar (Tamar Braxton song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 23:02, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hot Sugar (Tamar Braxton song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hot Sugar (Tamar Braxton song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 06:41, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of If I Don't Have You[edit]

The article If I Don't Have You you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:If I Don't Have You for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 12:03, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of If I Don't Have You[edit]

The article If I Don't Have You you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:If I Don't Have You for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:41, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 December 2017[edit]

Possibility of providing your input on a Peer Review for Regine Velasquez's entry[edit]

Hi Aoba47,

I'm writing to ask whether you would consider having a look at the article. I'm aware that you've been involved with a few PRs before. I've given it a major rewrite and complete overhaul. I began working on the article late October when it looked like this and somehow ended up rewriting the whole thing and aiming for potentially FA. This isn't a process I've been through before, but I have been reading the reviews here in preparation, and am familiar with FAC demands. I would very much appreciate a fresh set of eyes and happily address any concerns you may have.

Thanks! Pseud 14 (talk) 10:38, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Pseud 14: Thank you for your comment. Unfortunately, I will have to say no to this. I do not have enough experience in this subject matter or confidence in my reviewing abilities to comfortably help with this. I also have not had that much experience with the peer review system. Good luck with it though. Have a wonderful rest of your day or night! Aoba47 (talk) 16:57, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Let Me Know (Tamar Braxton song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Let Me Know (Tamar Braxton song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TFA[edit]

Thank you for Chad Harris-Crane, "a fictional character on the American soap opera Passions, which aired on NBC from 1999 to 2007 and on DirecTV in 2007–08. The character made daytime television and soap opera history for participating in the first instance in a soap opera of two men simulating sex."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:18, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your comment! It means a lot to me. Have a wonderful rest of your day or night! Aoba47 (talk) 18:55, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats! FrB.TG (talk) 20:43, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AmilQuarrelsAudioSample.ogg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AmilQuarrelsAudioSample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:25, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas to all![edit]

We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2018!
Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless!  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aoba47, when the article was tagged with "lead too long", I think what may have been meant was that according to MOS:LEADLENGTH, an article of about 13K prose characters should have a lead of one or two paragraphs. Between 15K and 30K, the number goes to two or three paragraphs, and the lead is currently three paragraphs.

Just be aware that this may come up during any GA review; perhaps there is a way to apportion the lead so its contents are in two rather than three paragraphs, or perhaps you can make the argument that, since this is almost 15K, a third paragraph is warranted despite the MOS guideline (especially if they are not long paragraphs). Best of luck! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:56, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for the comment. I will look into it in the future. It seems like a rather silly part of the style guide in my opinion though. Aoba47 (talk) 18:00, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas![edit]

Wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2018!
A very Happy, Glorious, Prosperous Christmas and New Year! God bless!  — Adityavagarwal (talk) 17:04, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Satsu (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)[edit]

Hello: The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Satsu (Buffy the Vampire Slayer) has been completed.

I want to draw your attention to this sentence:

"Jeanty described the Japanese street fashion magazine as "full of photographs of Asian kids dressed in all funky way."

Because the wording in the quote seems odd I checked both sources to see if it had been transcribed incorrectly. I may have missed it, but I could not find this quote in either of them. You might want to check this. If he did actually say this you should put (sic) immediately after the final quotation mark.

Good luck with the GAN.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:47, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • The quote was taken from Source 11, and I will add the (sic) mark. Aoba47 (talk) 17:05, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Holiday Greetings[edit]

Holiday greetings and Best

Wishes for a very Happy New Year.
Cheers!!
Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you! Have a wonderful new year! Aoba47 (talk) 21:19, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kia Steave-Dickerson copyedit[edit]

Testing[edit]

I recently made multiple pings for the new peer review. Just wanted to know if they worked or not? Still, don't feel the need to comment so quickly. Merry Christmas :D Tintor2 (talk) 21:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your message. Merry Christmas to you as well! I will get to the peer review in a few weeks if that is okay. I will be pretty busy. Good luck with your current and future projects! Aoba47 (talk) 01:52, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Wait, did the ping work? I think it didn't because a fellow user only replied when I sent him a message. Happy holidays. Tintor2 (talk) 03:12, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3 of Hearts (album)[edit]

No worries; good luck with your planned FA nomination, and Happy New Year. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:35, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you again and I hope that you have a great New Year too! Aoba47 (talk) 03:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and added the GOCE template to the article's talk page. I had planned to nominate this article for a review myself, not knowing one had already been completed until I saw this section. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:25, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use[edit]

Thanks for the comments in the peer review. I changed the fair uses of the character article but I don't know if it's enough. Could you give it a look if you have time? Happy Holidays.Tintor2 (talk) 02:13, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • There were several spots in the boxes during the time of my review that were empty, so I think it is fine now, but I would recommend asking someone more experienced in this matter for completely clarification either way. Aoba47 (talk) 03:28, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Veronica Clare[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Veronica Clare you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 14:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Veronica Clare[edit]

The article Veronica Clare you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Veronica Clare for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 18:04, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mindful (song)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mindful (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 09:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of All Money Is Legal[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article All Money Is Legal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 09:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mindful (song)[edit]

The article Mindful (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mindful (song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 11:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the article's promotion! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:51, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mindful (song)[edit]

The article Mindful (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mindful (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 17:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, edits made during the copy edit by GOCE are not set in stone. If there are edits you disagree with, feel free to revert. I just like to get a project member to come review the article and offer suggestions, kind of like a third opinion from someone with fresh eyes. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:59, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for the note. I always appreciate getting help from the GOCE (they are probably annoyed by how many times that I request their help lol), but it is always good to review edits. Aoba47 (talk) 23:00, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't feel bad, they are not annoyed. Volunteers choose to conduct reviews, and I've nominated probably close to 100 articles for review myself, usually as a step towards GA. ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:06, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very true; it is really great that there is such a resource. Really shows the positive sides of the Wikipedia community to have people come together to improve content. Aoba47 (talk) 00:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All Money Is Legal[edit]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article All Money Is Legal has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN review.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:09, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aoba. I have nominated my first solo FAC. Do let me know if you wish to leave comments at the FAC by pinging me. Thanks.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 12:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your message; I would be more than happy to provide comments for your FAC. If possible, I would greatly appreciate it if you could do a review for my current FAC if you have the time. Either way, I am looking forward to reading through your article and doinng the review. Good luck with it! Aoba47 (talk) 17:48, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've hopefully resolved your comments. Do let me know if there is anything pending. Thanks.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HNY[edit]

Hello Aoba. I know it's a couple of days late but I just wanted to wish you a happy new year. I hope it's full of success. PanagiotisZois (talk) 14:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your message! I hope that you are having a wonderful new year too! I have made a few resolutions so I am determined to be more productive with my work this year for a change lol. Aoba47 (talk) 17:50, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nature of a Sista[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nature of a Sista you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DAP388 -- DAP388 (talk) 16:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nature of a Sista[edit]

The article Nature of a Sista you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Nature of a Sista for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DAP388 -- DAP388 (talk) 18:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of All Money Is Legal[edit]

The article All Money Is Legal you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:All Money Is Legal for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of All Money Is Legal[edit]

The article All Money Is Legal you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:All Money Is Legal for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 08:21, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup[edit]

I'm routing for you. Good luck! ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you! I will try my best! Thank you for the help with the MTV: TRL Christmas article by the way. Aoba47 (talk) 01:27, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have also nominated this PR. Do let me know if you wish to leave comments there by pinging me. Thanks.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:43, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your message! Good luck with your peer review. I will try to get to it sometime, but I can unfortunately not guarantee too much as I am trying to limit my time on Wikipedia. I am primarily doing my own GAN and FAC projects, and will probably take a break from reviews for the time being. I need to learn how to be better as a reviewer anyway lol. Aoba47 (talk) 18:15, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FAC reviewing barnstar[edit]

The Reviewer Barnstar
FAC can't function without people like you contributing reviews. Thank you for the seven FAC reviews you did during December. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:28, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas with Friends (India.Arie and Joe Sample album)[edit]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Christmas with Friends (India.Arie and Joe Sample album) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:58, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Aoba47, congratulations on your recent FACs, it's getting hard to keep track at your pace tbh. xD I was wondering if you were willing to review the article at GAR. It's strictly optional as I see that you're working on so much already. Let me know, thanks. Oh, and add this to your long list of movies to watch, It's an absolute delight! VedantTalk 06:43, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for the kind words! I will definitely add this film to my last (the title alone is amazing lol). Unfortunately, I am taking a break from doing GAN reviews so I will have to pass on this one. Good luck with it though! Aoba47 (talk) 15:33, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kia Steave-Dickerson[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kia Steave-Dickerson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 14:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kia Steave-Dickerson[edit]

The article Kia Steave-Dickerson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kia Steave-Dickerson for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 18:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate your comments as always, Aoba. Its my first attempt at a Bollywood awards list. Do let me know if you wish to leave comments at the FLC by pinging me. Thanks.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Ssven2: Thank you for your message, and good luck with your nominations. I am actually taking a small hiatus from reviewing to focus on some off-Wikipedia projects. I will primarily be using my time to focus on some of my own content creation and GAN/FAC projects. I apologize for not being able to help, but I hope that you are doing well! Aoba47 (talk) 16:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review[edit]

It's been over a month since Boruto: Naruto the Movie was nominated to GA. If you have free time, could you give it a look? Good luck with your work. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 14:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Tintor2: Thank you for your message. I am currently taking a break from reviews so I am unfortunately unable to review the article. Unfortunately, the GAN process can take a rather long time, as there are several nominations that have been open for months. Good luck with it though. Aoba47 (talk) 19:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nature of a Sista'[edit]

No worries. I've a question - in the list of recording studios used in the second paragraph of "Background and recording", I found "Quadraphinc Studios, Quadraphonic Studios". Are these the same studio, or two different ones with very similar names? Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 08:13, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for the question and the c/e so far! According to the source, they are two different studios with very similar names. Aoba47 (talk) 16:05, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply Aoba47; I was going to remove "Quadraphinic" as a spelling error, but thought I should check. When I restart the c/e I'll add a hidden note for other editors to that effect. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:32, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you! That would make the most sense to me. I need to learn more about hidden notes. Hope you are having a wonderful day so far. Aoba47 (talk) 20:04, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Pongal, Makar Sankranti, Lohri and Bihu to you![edit]

May all your endeavours have a fruitful beginning and prosperous ending!  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 09:53, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Something About The Night[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Something About The Night you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:42, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Something About The Night[edit]

The article Something About The Night you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Something About The Night for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw your recent work[edit]

Apologies again, that was a blunder on my part. Good to see you back. - Dank (push to talk) 02:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I reacted poorly, and apologies for that. Hope you are doing well and having a good week so far! Aoba47 (talk) 09:22, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]