User talk:AryKun/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Hypsugo lanzai moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Hypsugo lanzai, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 14:46, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to WikiProject Bats!
Thanks for your recent interest in editing bat articles! Happy to have another bat editor around :) Let me know if you need help with anything! Enwebb (talk) 23:36, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Just letting you know that editing someone else's talk page comments should generally be avoided (just part of Wiki-etiquette!) We have lots of policies and guidelines you'll learn as you keep editing, and no one expects you to know them all. The specific guideline here is WP:TPO. Happy editing! Enwebb (talk) 15:36, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Exceptional Newcomer Award | |
| Thanks a lot for turning stubs into better articles! Enwebb (talk) 03:06, 30 March 2020 (UTC) |
Speciesboxes
Hi, good to see the new articles you are creating! Could you please remember to add |taxon= to {{Speciesbox}} templates? (See e.g. Artibeus aequatorialis). The taxobox may appear correct without this parameter, but it then relies on the page title, so could break if moved or other changes were made. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Prasinoxena edits
Hello, I did a bunch of edits on the series of moth articles you created in the genus Prasinoxena. Thanks for creating those. If you have any questions about my edits or wonder why I did what I did, feel free to ask. I put some notes in the edit summaries, but that might not be clear enough. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 00:03, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the edits!TheLordOfWikis (talk) 08:59, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Gianna Maria-Onore Bryant for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gianna Maria-Onore Bryant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gianna Maria-Onore Bryant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rockchalk717 19:48, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, TheLordOfWikis
Thank you for creating Austrarchaea judyae.
User:Nerd1a4i, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
May I suggest, since you're batch creating these, that you also make sure to add in wikilinks, italic title template, italics & bold on the first use of the article name in the body, and taxobar (the last to be connected to wikidata)? I'd be happy to explain how to do any of these things. Thanks for putting all the work in :)
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nerd1a4i}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Nerd1a4i (talk) 06:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Gianna Maria-Onore Bryant
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Gianna Maria-Onore Bryant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gianna Bryant (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 18:46, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Recreating pages that have been deleted under a different name can be viewed as disruptive editing. I am assuming that you were unaware that the page for Gianna Bryant had been redirected and protected as a result of a deletion discussion, which is why the page for Gianna Maria-Onore Bryant was speedy deleted. Rlendog (talk) 14:26, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, TheLordOfWikis
Thank you for creating Eriauchenius ratsirarsoni.
User:Blythwood, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Looks solid, but it's a much better plan to link the article to the Wikidata entry on Wikidata, and then you don't need to put anything in the taxobar. This links the article immediately to Wikispecies entries, the commons category, etc, and means if the Wikidata entry needs to be modified the taxobar will change to the right Wikidata entry at the same time rather than being stuck with whatever value it has now. Hope that makes sense!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Blythwood (talk) 04:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Blythwood: Could you tell me how to do that?TheLordOfWikis (talk) 03:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
australian biota items
xxx is a spider in australia is extraordinarily unhelpful - and even more so when only one generic not specific reference is provided -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrarchaea_platnickorum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zephyrarchaea_vichickmani - yeah so where?
consider the size of australia, consider the size of the reference lists - please make an effort to do more than what you have done, thanks... JarrahTree 11:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- I make all the articles at once out of convenience. I improve them later when I can find the time.
For example: Zephyrarchaea marki Zephyrarchaea marae Also, I am not well versed in spiders, so I don't type the description areas because I do not understand much of it. TheLordOfWikis (talk) 13:06, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- If you do not understand much of it, I strongly suggest you create articles that are beyond useless - some editors would indeed sanction you for such creations - please get a grip on something you know about or can actually give more than unhelpful one line additions with generic hard to grapple one source generic reference items... thanks JarrahTree 05:29, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Copying licensed material requires attribution
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Zephyrarchaea marki you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 00:28, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Enwebb (talk) 16:05, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Good move
I appreciate your name change. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 06:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Superb fairywren into Purple-crowned fairywren. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your draft article, Draft:Hypsugo lanzai
Hello, AryKun. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hypsugo lanzai".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Purple-crowned fairywren
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Purple-crowned fairywren you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaptainEek -- CaptainEek (talk) 01:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Purple-crowned fairywren
The article Purple-crowned fairywren you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Purple-crowned fairywren for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaptainEek -- CaptainEek (talk) 18:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
sfn calls
Hi AryKun: I'm working my way through the WP:BIRD cleanup list and finding a bunch of recently modified fairywren articles with bad {{sfn}} calls. And I tracked them here. ;) Just FYI, when you're using {{sfn}} for a ref with multiple authors, you have to list each author's names separately (i.e. with first/last rather than just author), or it doesn't work. Also, in the call itself, separate the names with a pipe rather than "and". Here's a link to show the fix so you can see what I mean. Thanks for the updates, and happy editing! MeegsC (talk) 09:32, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Black-and-red broadbill
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Black-and-red broadbill you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aircorn -- Aircorn (talk) 07:20, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. I have left a review. Unfortunately I am concerned about some close paraphrasing that will need to be resolved before this can pass (plus a few other minor issues). Aircorn (talk) 11:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Black-and-red broadbill
The article Black-and-red broadbill you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Black-and-red broadbill for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aircorn -- Aircorn (talk) 19:21, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Black-and-red broadbill
On 23 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Black-and-red broadbill, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the black-and-red broadbill lays eggs in three color morphs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Black-and-red broadbill. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Black-and-red broadbill), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—valereee (talk) 00:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Scarlet-and-white tanager at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 05:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black-and-red broadbill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Latham. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Oops!
Hi there! Not a dig, just to let you know in case it is helpful in future. In this edit, whilst sorting out bare URLs (thank you!), you accidentally substituted a link to a page regarding Cornwall for the right one in Northumberland. Don't worry – I have put it right for you. (To be honest, I am not sure how much I love that ref anyway, but that is another question!) Hope this helps, happy editing, cheers DBaK (talk) 09:56, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Scarlet-and-white tanager
On 17 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Scarlet-and-white tanager, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the scarlet-and-white tanager swallows small berries whole, but eats larger fruit piece by piece? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Scarlet-and-white tanager. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Scarlet-and-white tanager), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Invisible Barnstar | |
| For your valued work in the July 2021 GAN Backlog Drive, which, in a single month, helped to reduce the backlog by nearly 50%. --Usernameunique (talk) 04:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Mountain kingfisher
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mountain kingfisher you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:41, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Chivi vireo
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chivi vireo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:41, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mountain kingfisher
The article Mountain kingfisher you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mountain kingfisher for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Chivi vireo
The article Chivi vireo you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chivi vireo for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Scarlet-and-white tanager
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scarlet-and-white tanager you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Dark long-tongued bat
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dark long-tongued bat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mountain kingfisher
The article Mountain kingfisher you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mountain kingfisher for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:21, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Chivi vireo
The article Chivi vireo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chivi vireo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:21, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Scarlet-and-white tanager
The article Scarlet-and-white tanager you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Scarlet-and-white tanager for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Dark long-tongued bat
The article Dark long-tongued bat you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dark long-tongued bat for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Flame-faced tanager
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Flame-faced tanager you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Autopatrolled granted
Hi AryKun, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 07:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Flame-faced tanager
The article Flame-faced tanager you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Flame-faced tanager for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Mini scule
On 6 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mini scule, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one of the smallest known species of frog is Mini scule? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mini scule. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mini scule), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hog Farm Talk 04:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Scarlet-and-white tanager
The article Scarlet-and-white tanager you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Scarlet-and-white tanager for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Dark long-tongued bat
The article Dark long-tongued bat you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dark long-tongued bat for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Flame-faced tanager
The article Flame-faced tanager you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Flame-faced tanager for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Anoscopus albifrons
On 9 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Anoscopus albifrons, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Anoscopus albifrons males can only be differentiated from other species in its genus by examining their aedeagi? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anoscopus albifrons. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Anoscopus albifrons), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Fraternal fruit-eating bat
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fraternal fruit-eating bat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 09:40, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Fraternal fruit-eating bat
The article Fraternal fruit-eating bat you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fraternal fruit-eating bat for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 17:41, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Gelae donut
Hello! Your submission of Gelae donut at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pamzeis (talk) 08:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Gelae donut
On 26 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gelae donut, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Gelae donut has large, protruding eyes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gelae donut. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gelae donut), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Promotion of Black-and-red broadbill
Triple Crown
Your GA nomination of Saffron-crowned tanager
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Saffron-crowned tanager you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wretchskull -- Wretchskull (talk) 16:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Suggestion for flags on destubbed biota articles
Hi AryKun. I note you have been destubbing some articles on birds as part of the Wikipedia:The 50,000 Destubbing Challenge. I am doing this for fishes at the moment. When I allocate a flag to the article I try to use the type locality of that species or of the type species for the ranks above species. Fortunately for me that information is readily available from the Catalog of Fishes. If the type locality is not known or is international, like Red Sea or Antarctic Ocean, I would nominate a nation named in the article for which the species has commercial or cultural significance or the nationality of the zoologist who described it.Quetzal1964 (talk) 16:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Alright, I'll do that from now on. AryKun (talk) 16:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, it is just a suggestion what you're doing just now isn't wrong. I just think the suggested way is tidier. Quetzal1964 (talk) 16:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Saffron-crowned tanager
The article Saffron-crowned tanager you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Saffron-crowned tanager for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wretchskull -- Wretchskull (talk) 11:01, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Emerald tanager
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Emerald tanager you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wretchskull -- Wretchskull (talk) 19:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Emerald tanager
The article Emerald tanager you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Emerald tanager for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wretchskull -- Wretchskull (talk) 18:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pale mountain pigeon
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pale mountain pigeon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Leomk0403 -- Leomk0403 (talk) 10:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black cuckoo-dove, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cuckoo-dove.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Awesome
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| Nice work right there by improving and nominating plenty of bird-related articles to GA. 118.106.201.158 (talk) 00:15, 20 November 2021 (UTC) |
DYK for Tibetan blackbird
On 20 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tibetan blackbird, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the biggest Turdus is 23–28 centimetres (9–10 inches) in length? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tibetan blackbird. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tibetan blackbird), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached Tibetian blackbird views (5,162 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of 430.2—nice work! |
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 02:52, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mini scule
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mini scule you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Silver-throated tanager
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Silver-throated tanager you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 17:00, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sword-billed hummingbird
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sword-billed hummingbird you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your GA nomination of Sword-billed hummingbird
The article Sword-billed hummingbird you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sword-billed hummingbird for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 09:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sword-billed hummingbird
The article Sword-billed hummingbird you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sword-billed hummingbird for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 14:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Sword-billed hummingbird at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:26, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mini scule
The article Mini scule you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mini scule for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 13:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations
|
The Featured Article Medal | |
| By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 10:42, 30 November 2021 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Silver-throated tanager
The article Silver-throated tanager you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Silver-throated tanager for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 13:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa described by Alfred Jefferis Turner indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 22:11, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Sword-billed hummingbird
On 11 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sword-billed hummingbird, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the sword-billed hummingbird (example pictured) is the only bird with a bill longer than its body? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sword-billed hummingbird. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sword-billed hummingbird), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 01:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Blue-and-black tanager
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Blue-and-black tanager you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 23:40, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Blue-and-black tanager
The article Blue-and-black tanager you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Blue-and-black tanager for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 14:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Tuvalu at the 2020 Summer Olympics
The article Tuvalu at the 2020 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Tuvalu at the 2020 Summer Olympics for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Kpddg (talk) 15:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Tuvalu at the 2020 Summer Olympics
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tuvalu at the 2020 Summer Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kpddg -- Kpddg (talk) 02:01, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Tuvalu at the 2020 Summer Olympics
The article Tuvalu at the 2020 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tuvalu at the 2020 Summer Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kpddg -- Kpddg (talk) 10:41, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pale mountain pigeon
The article Pale mountain pigeon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pale mountain pigeon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Leomk0403 -- Leomk0403 (talk) 20:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
|
Merry Christmas |
| Merry Christmas to the person who is expert about birds :D. 2001:4455:1A9:E100:BC60:CFFF:8315:1FAC (talk) 12:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC) |
- Wow, thanks! (although I wouldn't call myself an expert by any definition) AryKun (talk) 07:37, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Black-and-red broadbill scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Black-and-red broadbill article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January l, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 1, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.
For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.
We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:13, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank you today for the article about "a stunning species of broadbill that lives in Southeast Asia"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:18, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Precious
billed birds
Thank you for quality articles about bird and other members of the kingdom of life, such as Black-and-red broadbill, Mini scule, Silver-throated tanager, Sword-billed hummingbird and Fraternal fruit-eating bat, for exceptional reviewing, - Ary, you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2690 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:04, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Black cuckoo-dove
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Black cuckoo-dove you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wretchskull -- Wretchskull (talk) 16:40, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Buru mountain pigeon
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Buru mountain pigeon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:00, 1 January 2022 (UTC)