User talk:Ashish Narjinary
Contested deletion[edit]
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (its a page where people want to know about me and they keep on searching on internet , where i n wikipedia they could know more about me clearly. so i request this page should not be deleted.) --Ashish Narjinary (talk) 03:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, but your user page does not conform to Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself or your Wikimedia-related activities. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not a personal website, blog, or social networking site, nor should it be used to promote yourself, or host a fake article, CV/resumé or lengthy autobiography. Thanks. --Drm310 (talk) 03:52, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| good work Ashish narzy 03:54, 28 March 2015 (UTC) |
March 2015[edit]
Hello, Ashish Narjinary, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Ashish narzy (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 04:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ashish Narjinary[edit]
A tag has been placed on User:Ashish Narjinary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 (talk) 19:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Weaverbrown (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 09:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |
Ashish Narjinary (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I want somebody to help me to get unblock am a new user, I don't know how it works
Decline reason:
To be unblocked, please follow the instructions above, including reviewing the unblock appeals guide. 331dot (talk) 07:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- This user falsely claimed to have lost access to this account, over at User talk:The Fucture Wikipedian. Additionally, they removed their declined unblock request, even though this is not permitted. --Yamla (talk) 10:40, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Yamla I had lost access but hopefully by trying to login I could get back access to this account. Ashish Narjinary (talk) 13:37, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Yamla I removed this declined unblock request because first there was no reply for long and secondly I thought in user talk page am allowed to remove that. Ashish Narjinary (talk) 13:54, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Yamla I accept the mistake I did but this time it was in unknown to be honest. I deserve to be block but as learner I would be happy if you could do me a favour and not block me for permanently. Ashish Narjinary (talk) 13:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
FTR, this user was actually blocked as a sock of Ashish narzy – the reason the sockmaster issue is confused is, I think, that another of the socks was messing around with User:Ashish Narjinary and removed the existing CU tag from 2015 (here). I have asked at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ashish narzy to have Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ashish Narjinary merged with that SPI, as Ashish narzy is the oldest account. In any case, not exactly an innocent newbie. --bonadea contributions talk 14:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
bonadea As you can see I didn't edit much more than 50 even on this account. As I was learning and i got blocked and in my new sockpuppets accounts I was doing well and editing more untill I got block again. I did mistake and I absolutely accept that and I was learning too. Am not trying to create anymore accounts from now instead am trying to appeal and accept my mistake and would wish to get a second chance. Please help me instead of putting the blame. I accept the blame already I did. Ashish Narjinary (talk) 14:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)